Abstract
WE trust that it is not in the least likely that the proposal “From a Correspondent” in Saturday's Times to remove the Science Museum to make way for a permanent Colonial Museum will receive serious attention in any influential quarter. For this proposal really involves the monstrous step of shunting collections which have been brought together with so much trouble and at so much expense. Their value was recognised by the Duke of Devonshire's Commission. As to the Colonial Museum we shall be in a better position to express an opinion upon it when its nature and objects are further developed. We wish in no way to disparage it; but there is room for it elsewhere. Why should its founders try to build it on the ruins of an existing and valuable collection?
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Notes . Nature 34, 299–301 (1886). https://doi.org/10.1038/034299a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/034299a0