Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Miscellany
  • Published:

Notes

Abstract

WE trust that it is not in the least likely that the proposal “From a Correspondent” in Saturday's Times to remove the Science Museum to make way for a permanent Colonial Museum will receive serious attention in any influential quarter. For this proposal really involves the monstrous step of shunting collections which have been brought together with so much trouble and at so much expense. Their value was recognised by the Duke of Devonshire's Commission. As to the Colonial Museum we shall be in a better position to express an opinion upon it when its nature and objects are further developed. We wish in no way to disparage it; but there is room for it elsewhere. Why should its founders try to build it on the ruins of an existing and valuable collection?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Notes . Nature 34, 299–301 (1886). https://doi.org/10.1038/034299a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/034299a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing