Abstract
IN my studies with regard to the sign-languages I have, like others, turned some attention to cases of deafness. In such cases the use of signs, not the finger alphabet, but natural or conventional signs, such as are used by Indians or by deaf-mutes of themselves, have appeared to me to give particular satisfaction to the sufferer. The nervousness attendant upon attempting to make out what is said being avoided, the relief is very great, and more attention is given to what is spoken. Of course such aid to those untrained is but partial, and English people accustomed solely to the use of speech are rather unapt, but nevertheless signs are valuable auxiliaries, and will be found worth trying. Individuals vary in their capability, but inasmuch as many children pass through a period of sign-language, there will be many cases of adaptability. Whoever has watched deaf-mutes conversing, without the finger alphabet or without lip-reading, will recognise the satisfaction they receive from their intercourse by signs. My only object is to call attention to what has been found by experience to be an acceptable help, and which may be extended in its application.
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
CLARKE, H. Deafness and Signs. Nature 34, 265 (1886). https://doi.org/10.1038/034265b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/034265b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.