Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Geological Climates

Abstract

SINCE contributing the chapter in the history of the Coniferæ upon which Prof. Haughton remarks, I have seen Araucaria Cunninghami growing in gardens round Funchal, and my belief in the specific identity of the Bournemouth Eocene plant is further strengthened; yet still, as only foliage is known in the fossil, I should hardly be prepared to contest upon that alone a question of climate, however minute the resemblance. But even with the most undisputed identity there are so many possibilities of error in arguing from a single species, that little importance should be attached to conclusions drawn from it.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GARDNER, J. Geological Climates. Nature 23, 53–54 (1880). https://doi.org/10.1038/023053d0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/023053d0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing