Abstract
IN the list of fossils appended to the paper upon the Alum Bay flora, brought before the Royal Society by Baron von Ettingshauseu and reported in NATURE, vol. xxi. p. 555, the new species have Ett. and Gard. attached to them, implying that Ettingshausen and myself are their authors. It is only fair to Ettingshausan to state that I had no share in making the determinations, and to myself, that I accept them simply as provisional. Associated as he is with me in the work upon the British eocene floras, he felt that he could hardly publish preliminary work connected with it in any other way. I completely disagree with him, however, as to the utility of publishing new specific names unaccompanied by drawings or descriptions of any kind, and think that a simple list of genera, with the number of new species in each, would have been unattended with any inconvenience. He appears to me to attach altogether undue weight to mere priority in nomenclature, and the existence of such provisional lists, far from aiding research, must prove a serious difficulty to our fellow workers. In the highly probable event of an author being unable to come from some distant country to examine the specimens themselves, is he, for instance, to forbear naming every undescribed species of such common Tertiary genera as Ficus, of which eight new and unpublished species are in the list, of Celastrus, of which there are five, or of any other of the some fifty genera containing new specific names? He could not safely name even any indeterminable leaf or fruit, for fear it might be one of the long list of Phyllites or Carpolithes for which Ettingshausen has devised specific names.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Bulletin of the Museum of Comp. Zoology, 1869, vol. i., No. 13.
Coast Survey Reports, 1850 to present day; also Bibliography of Biological Results (Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., vol. v., No. 9, 1878).
"Thalassa", 1877, p. 15.
"Deep-Sea Soundings in the North Pacific obtained by the United States ship Tuscarora" (Washington: Hydrographic Office, 1874, No. 54, p. 30):—1874. Fathoms June 11 1874 4,643 Fathoms Wire broke; bottom not reached. June 17 1874 4,340 Fathoms Yellow and clay brown mud. June 17 1874 4,356 Fathoms Yellowish mud and sand and specks of lava. June 18 1874 4,041 Fathoms Yellow and clay-coloured mud and gravel. June 18 1874 4,234 Fathoms Rocky; point of cylinder came up battered. June 18 1874 4,120 Fathoms Yellow and clay-coloured mud mixed. June 18 1874 4,411 Fathoms No specimen; wire broke (while reeling in). June 19 1874 4,655 Fathoms No specimen; wire broke (while reeling in).
United Service Magazine, July, 1879.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
GARDNER, J. On the Alum Bay Flora. Nature 21, 588 (1880). https://doi.org/10.1038/021588a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/021588a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.