Abstract
PROF. ASA GRAY, in his very interesting lecture on the disribution of the forest trees of the northern temperate region (NATURE, vol. xix. p. 327), after pointing out the remarkable differences that exist between the forests of the eastern and western sides both of North America and the Old World, suggests that the great poverty of the European as compared with the Japan-Manchurian region in this respect was caused by the Mediterranean cutting off the retreat of the flora which then occupied Europe, as it retired, at the approach of the glacial epoch, before the ice from the north. This explanation derives considerable support from some other facts in geographical distribution. The most characteristic Alpine and Arctic butterflies of the Palæarctic region belong to the three genera, Parnassius, chionobas, and Erebia. Of Parnassius, Dr. Staudinger, in his latest catalogue (1871) enumerates fourteen Palæarctic species, of which three occur in North and Central Europe, ranging as far south as the Balkans, but always in or near high lands, about a dozen occur in temperate Asia, ranging as far east as the Amur, and probably as many in North America, where they also are truly Alpine butterflies. Of Chionobas one species (C. aëllo, confined to the Alps) occurs in Central Europe, whilst six or seven others range from Lapland over Russia and Siberia, Mongolia, &c., to the Amur, and there are numerous species in Arctic and Alpine North America. Of Erebia there are fortyfive Palæarctic species enumerated by Staudinger, and of these no less than twenty-five occur in the central Alpine chains of Europe. The genus likewise ranges all over temperate Asia, going as far south as the Himalayas and Moupin, and in North America is represented by a dozen or more species. Now, though an Erebia (E. Tyndarus, var.) occurs as far south in Europe as the Sierra Nevada, not a single species of any of these three genera occurs in North Africa, although the Atlas Mountains would seem eminently well suited for such Alpine insects. In this case, then, it seems clear that the same cause—the barrier of the Mediterranean—which in the case of the miocene flora of Europe prevented any further retreat south, has operated to prevent any similar southerly spread amongst the victorious invaders from the north which pressed on the retiring host.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
FORBES, W. The Glacial Period and Geographical Distribution. Nature 19, 363–364 (1879). https://doi.org/10.1038/019363c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/019363c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.