Abstract
HAVING for some time past watched with painful interest the prosecutions under the new Adulteration Act, and seeing very clearly that whatever may be its success or failure in reference to its intended object, this Act of Parliament is becoming eminently successful in bringing chemical science into contempt, I am glad to see that you have taken up the subject in the columns of NATURE. I hope that it will be freely discussed. It may be safely affirmed that in the majority of cases where the vendor has made an effort to defend himself he has been able to flatly and positively contradict the certificate of the public analyst by counter-certificates of other analysts of equal or superior eminence. The butter case you have quoted is no exception, but may be taken as about a typical or average sample of such prosecutions. If this deplorable state of things is to continue, the general public will be perfectly logical in concluding that either the public analysts are generally incompetent, or that chemical analysis is self-contradictory, and therefore worthless. The subject is one that seriously affects the dignity and general interests of science.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
WILLIAMS, W. The Difficulties of the Public Analysts. Nature 13, 266–267 (1876). https://doi.org/10.1038/013266c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/013266c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.