Abstract
Large-scale wind and solar photovoltaic infrastructures are rapidly expanding in Brazil. These low-carbon technologies can exacerbate land struggles rooted in historical inequities in landownership, lack of regulation and weak governance. Here we trace how green grabbing—that is, the large-scale appropriation and control of (undesignated) public lands, both formally legal and illicit, for the development of wind and solar photovoltaic power—has developed in Brazil from 2000 to 2021. We find that global investors and owners, mainly from Europe, are involved in 78% of wind and 96% of solar photovoltaic parks, occupying 2,148 km2 and 102 km2 of land, respectively. We also show that land privatization is the prevalent land tenure regime for securing land, indicating substantial transformations of prior (undesignated) public and common lands. We conclude that green grabbing is a persistent, critical phenomenon in Brazil, requiring transparency and vigilant monitoring of land claims and tenure modifications.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The ownership and finance data that support the findings of this study are available from BNEF, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under licence for the current study and so are not publicly available. All other datasets are publicly available from government institutions, but under non-sharing licences. We therefore cannot provide a repository with the original data; however, we have uploaded the processed data to Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.10360706 (ref. 71). In addition, we provide the download sources in Supplementary Table 1.
Code availability
The R code used to analyse the data can be found at https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.10360706.
References
Anuário Estatístico de Energia Elétrica 2022 Ano Base 2021 (2022 Statistical Yearbook of Electricity—2021 Baseline Year) (MME & EPE, 2023).
Schmidt, J., Cancella, R. & Pereira, A. O. An optimal mix of solar PV, wind and hydro power for a low-carbon electricity supply in Brazil. Renew. Energy 85, 137–147 (2016).
Franco, J. C. & Borras, S. M. The global climate of land politics. Globalizations 18, 1277–1297 (2021).
Yenneti, K., Day, R. & Golubchikov, O. Spatial justice and the land politics of renewables: dispossessing vulnerable communities through solar energy mega-projects. Geoforum 76, 90–99 (2016).
Brannstrom, C. et al. Is Brazilian wind power development sustainable? Insights from a review of conflicts in Ceará state. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 67, 62–71 (2017).
Avila, S. Contesting energy transitions: wind power and conflicts in the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. J. Polit. Ecol. 24, 992–1012 (2017).
IPCC Special Report on Climate Change and Land (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.) (IPCC, 2019).
White, B., Borras, S. M. Jr, Hall, R., Scoones, I. & Wolford, W. The new enclosures: critical perspectives on corporate land deals. J. Peasant Stud. 39, 619–647 (2012).
Edelman, M., Oya, C. & Borras, S. M. Global land grabs: historical processes, theoretical and methodological implications and current trajectories. Third World Q. 34, 1517–1531 (2013).
Cotula, L. The international political economy of the global land rush: a critical appraisal of trends, scale, geography and drivers. J. Peasant Stud. 39, 649–680 (2012).
Zoomers, A. Globalisation and the foreignisation of space: seven processes driving the current global land grab. J. Peasant Stud. 37, 429–447 (2010).
De Schutter, O. How not to think of land-grabbing: three critiques of large-scale investments in farmland. J. Peasant Stud. 38, 249–279 (2011).
Beyerlee, D. & Deininger, K. Growing resource scarcity and global farmland investment. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 5, 13–34 (2013).
Carrero, G. C., Walker, R. T., Simmons, C. S. & Fearnside, P. M. Land grabbing in the Brazilian Amazon: stealing public land with government approval. Land Use Policy 120, 106133 (2022).
Klingler, M. & Mack, P. Post-frontier governance up in smoke? Free-for-all frontier imaginations encourage illegal deforestation and appropriation of public lands in the Brazilian Amazon. J. Land Use Sci. 15, 424–438 (2020).
Brito, B., Barreto, P., Brandão, A., Baima, S. & Gomes, P. H. Stimulus for land grabbing and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 064018 (2019).
Fairhead, J., Leach, M. & Scoones, I. Green grabbing: a new appropriation of nature? J. Peasant Stud. 39, 237–261 (2012).
Leach, M., Fairhead, J. & Fraser, J. Green grabs and biochar: revaluing African soils and farming in the new carbon economy. J. Peasant Stud. 39, 285–307 (2012).
Corson, C. & MacDonald, K. I. Enclosing the global commons: the convention on biological diversity and green grabbing. J. Peasant Stud. 39, 263–283 (2012).
Siamanta, Z. C. Wind parks in post-crisis Greece: neoliberalisation vis-à-vis green grabbing. Environ. Plan. E 2, 274–303 (2019).
Stock, R. Power for the Plantationocene: solar parks as the colonial form of an energy plantation. J. Peasant Stud. 50, 162–184 (2023).
Franco, J. C. & Borras, S. M. Grey areas in green grabbing: subtle and indirect interconnections between climate change politics and land grabs and their implications for research. Land Use Policy 84, 192–199 (2019).
Borras, S. M., Franco, J. C., Gómez, S., Kay, C. & Spoor, M. Land grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean. J. Peasant Stud. 39, 845–872 (2012).
Torres Contreras, G. A. Who owns the land owns the wind? Land and citizenship in the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, Mexico. J. Agrar. Change 23, 365–384 (2023).
Torres‐Mazuera, G. Dispossession through land titling: legal loopholes and shadow procedures to urbanized forestlands in the Yucatán Peninsula. J. Agrar. Change 23, 346–364 (2023).
Peluso, N. L. & Lund, C. New frontiers of land control: introduction. J. Peasant Stud. 38, 667–681 (2011).
Dunlap, A. & Arce, M. C. ‘Murderous energy’ in Oaxaca, Mexico: wind factories, territorial struggle and social warfare. J. Peasant Stud. 49, 455–480 (2022).
Torres Contreras, G. A. Twenty-five years under the wind turbines in La Venta, Mexico: social difference, land control and agrarian change. J. Peasant Stud. 49, 865–883 (2022).
Franquesa, J. Power Struggles: Dignity, Value, and the Renewable Energy Frontier in Spain (Indiana Univ. Press, 2018).
Backhouse, M. & Lehmann, R. New ‘renewable’ frontiers: contested palm oil plantations and wind energy projects in Brazil and Mexico. J. Land Use Sci. 15, 373–388 (2020).
Hershaw, E. & Sauer, S. Land and investment dynamics along Brazil’s ‘final’ frontier: the financialization of the Matopiba at a political crossroads. Land Use Policy 131, 106675 (2023).
Anseeuw, W., Lay, J., Messerli, P., Giger, M. & Taylor, M. Creating a public tool to assess and promote transparency in global land deals: the experience of the Land Matrix. J. Peasant Stud. 40, 521–530 (2013).
Reydon, B. P., Fernandes, V. B. & Telles, T. S. Land tenure in Brazil: the question of regulation and governance. Land Use Policy 42, 509–516 (2015).
Sparovek, G. et al. Who owns Brazilian lands? Land Use Policy 87, 104062 (2019).
Traldi, M. Accumulation by dispossession and green grabbing: wind farms, lease agreements, land appropriation in the Brazilian semiarid. Ambiente Soc. 24, e00522 (2021).
Imbirussú, É., de Oliveira, G. G. & Germani, G. I. in Towards Just and Sustainable Economies (eds North, P. & Cato, M. S.) 155–176 (Bristol Univ. Press, 2018).
Barbosa, J., Dias, L. P., Simoes, S. G. & Seixas, J. When is the sun going to shine for the Brazilian energy sector? A story of how modelling affects solar electricity. Renew. Energy 162, 1684–1702 (2020).
Deng, Y. et al. Harmonized and open energy dataset for modeling a highly renewable Brazilian power system. Sci. Data 10, 103 (2023).
Fthenakis, V. & Kim, H. C. Land use and electricity generation: a life-cycle analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13, 1465–1474 (2009).
Matthäus, D. & Mehling, M. De-risking renewable energy investments in developing countries: a multilateral guarantee mechanism. Joule 4, 2627–2645 (2020).
Tolmasquim, M. T., de Barros Correia, T., Addas Porto, N. & Kruger, W. Electricity market design and renewable energy auctions: the case of Brazil. Energy Policy 158, 112558 (2021).
Isah, A. et al. Financing renewable energy: policy insights from Brazil and Nigeria. Energy Sustain. Soc. 13 (2023).
Bazilian, M., Cuming, V. & Kenyon, T. Local-content rules for renewables projects don’t always work. Energy Strategy Rev. 32, 100569 (2020).
Werner, D. & Lazaro, L. L. B. The policy dimension of energy transition: the Brazilian case in promoting renewable energies (2000–2022). Energy Policy 175, 113480 (2023).
Turkovska, O. et al. Land-use requirements of solar and wind power. Preprint at EarthArXiv https://doi.org/10.31223/X5XM4H (2023).
Araújo, J. C. H., Souza, W. F. D., Meireles, A. J. D. A. & Brannstrom, C. Sustainability challenges of wind power deployment in Coastal Ceará State, Brazil. Sustainability 12, 5562 (2020).
Dunlap, A. Counterinsurgency for wind energy: the Bíi Hioxo wind park in Juchitán, Mexico. J. Peasant Stud. 45, 630–652 (2018).
Stock, R. & Birkenholtz, T. The sun and the scythe: energy dispossessions and the agrarian question of labor in solar parks. J. Peasant Stud. 48, 984–1007 (2021).
Borras, S. M. et al. The value of so-called ‘failed’ large-scale land acquisitions. Land Use Policy 119, 106199 (2022).
Gorayeb, A., Brannstrom, C., de Andrade Meireles, A. J. & de Sousa Mendes, J. Wind power gone bad: critiquing wind power planning processes in northeastern Brazil. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 40, 82–88 (2018).
Frate, C. A., Brannstrom, C., De Morais, M. V. G. & Caldeira-Pires, A. D. A. Procedural and distributive justice inform subjectivity regarding wind power: a case from Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. Energy Policy 132, 185–195 (2019).
SDE, SDR, CDA, PGE-BA. Instrução Normativa Conjunta 01/2020 https://www.sda.sdr.ba.gov.br/documentos/instrucoes-normativas (2020).
Marques, J., Barreto, A., Barrero, F. M. C. & Maia, Í. O Cárcere Dos Ventos: Destruição Das Serras Pelos Complexos Eólicos Vol. 3 (Editora Sabeh, 2021).
Neri, M., Jameli, D., Bernard, E. & Melo, F. P. L. Green versus green? Adverting potential conflicts between wind power generation and biodiversity conservation in Brazil. Perspect. Ecol. Conserv. 17, 131–135 (2019).
Turkovska, O. et al. Land-use impacts of Brazilian wind power expansion. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 024010 (2021).
Bisognin Garlet, T., de Souza Savian, F., Duarte Ribeiro, J. L. & Mairesse Siluk, J. C. Unlocking Brazil’s green hydrogen potential: overcoming barriers and formulating strategies to this promising sector. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 49, 553–570 (2024).
Posit.Co. R Studio Server v.2023.23.0. https://posit.co/products/open-source/rstudio-server (2023).
Q-Gis v.3.28. https://download.qgis.org/downloads/ (2022).
Rickman, J., Larosa, F. & Ameli, N. The internal dynamics of fast-growing wind finance markets. J. Clean. Prod. 375, 134129 (2022).
IRENA. Renewable Energy Statistics 2022 (IRENA, 2022).
IRENA. IRENASTAT Online Data Query Tool (IRENA, 2023).
Reydon, B. P., Fernandes, V. B. & Telles, T. S. Land governance as a precondition for decreasing deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy 94, 104313 (2020).
Sistema de Gestão Fundiária, SIGEF (INCRA, 2022).
Brazilian Native Vegetation Protection Law ‘LEI no. 12.651, de 25 de Maio de 2012 (Presidência da República do Brasil, 2012).
Boletim Informativo CAR—Junho/2022 (Brazilian Forest Service) https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/servico-florestal-brasileiro/boletim-informativo-car/BoletimCARJUN.pdf (2022).
Moutinho, P. & Azevedo-Ramos, C. Untitled public forestlands threaten Amazon conservation. Nat. Commun. 14, 1152 (2023).
Pacheco, A. & Meyer, C. Land tenure drives Brazil’s deforestation rates across socio-environmental contexts. Nat. Commun. 13, 5759 (2022).
Global Wind Atlas (GWA 2.3) (DTU Wind Energy, ESMAP & World Bank Group, 2021).
Guillet, J. Financing Offshore Wind (World Forum Offshore Wind) https://wfo-global.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/WFO_FinancingOffshoreWind_2022.pdf (2022).
Camarinha-Matos, L. M., Oliveira, A. I., Ferrada, F. & Thamburaj, V. Collaborative services provision for solar power plants. IMDS 117, 946–966 (2017).
Klingler, M., Rickman, J., Amelie, N. & Schmidt, J. Large-scale green grabbing for wind and solar PV development in Brazil. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.10360706 (2023).
Acknowledgements
We thank P. G. D. Huber, F. Wiesenhofer and C. Mikovits for support in data preparation. We particularly thank the entire consortium (AATR, CPT, IRPAA, 10envolvimento and GeografAR from the Federal University of Bahia) for collaboration and knowledge sharing in the initiative ‘Energias Renováveis na Bahia: Caminhos e Descaminhos’ (https://www.dossienergiasrenovaveis.com.br/index.html) between April 2021 and July 2022. J.S. and M.K. acknowledge support from the European Research Council (grant ‘reFUEL’ ERC-2017-STG 758149). N.A. acknowledges support from the European Research Council (grant ‘LINKS’ ERC-2019-STG 802891). The findings do not represent the views of the funding agencies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.K. and J.S. designed the empirical analysis, performed the data analysis and wrote the paper. N.A. provided the data and discussed and revised the paper. J.R. contributed with data analysis rules and revised the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Sustainability thanks Patrick Bigger and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Tables 1–5, Figs. 1–9 and Sections 2.1 and 2.2.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Klingler, M., Ameli, N., Rickman, J. et al. Large-scale green grabbing for wind and solar photovoltaic development in Brazil. Nat Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01346-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01346-2