Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Multifaceted drivers for onshore wind energy repowering and their implications for energy transition

Nature Energy volume 5, pages 1012–1021 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Wind energy is anticipated to become a backbone of the future energy system. Ageing wind turbine fleets, increasing land-use constraints and rising relevance of societal factors make the deployment of land-based (onshore) wind energy ever more complicated. Consequently, repowering is expected to become a rapidly growing point of focus for the wind industry. Here we propose a more holistic and socially informed project-level approach to analyse repowering activity that enables a more robust understanding of the process and potentials. We demonstrate that for wind pioneer in Denmark, only 67% of the capacity removed in repowering projects was related to the physical space needed for a new turbine. Other factors that drive repowering include regulation (for example, noise-related, 8–17%), development principles (for example, aesthetics, 7–20%) and political bargaining (4–13%). The recognition of repowering as a negotiated process between host communities and wind developers will probably be critical to unlock the full potential of wind energy in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

Rent or Buy

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Illustrative map of a typical repowering project that includes the on-site as well as off-site dismantling of turbines.
Fig. 2: Distribution of wind turbines in repowering projects by dismantling category.

Data availability

The dataset generated during the current study is published as Supplementary Data 1 (spreadsheet format). Although the dataset contains all quantitative data collected from the different sources, we cannot disclose specific disaggregate information from the interviews, which have been conducted under the Chatham House rules. Interview transcripts and notes may be requested from the authors, but will only be handed out after explicit consent from the interviewees. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. 1.

    Global Wind Energy Report 2018 (Global Wind Council Energy, 2019); https://gwec.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/GWEC-Global-Wind-Report-2018.pdf

  2. 2.

    Wind Energy in Europe in 2018—Trends and Statistics (WindEurope, 2019); www.windeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/files/about-wind/statistics/WindEurope-Annual-Statistics-2018.pdf

  3. 3.

    Rekord Lav CO2-Udledning fra Danskernes Elforbrug i 2019 (Energinet, 2020); www.energinet.dk/Om-nyheder/Nyheder/2020/01/16/Rekord-lav-CO2udledning-fra-danskernes-elforbrug-i-2019

  4. 4.

    Lantz, E., Leventhal, M. & Baring-Gould, I. Wind Power Project Repowering: Financial Feasibility, Decision Drivers, and Supply Chain Effects. Prepared under Task no. WE11.0630, Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-60535 (NREL, 2013); www.nrel.gov/docs/fy14osti/60535.pdf

  5. 5.

    Silvosa, A. C., Gómez, G. I. & Del Río, P. Analyzing the techno-economic determinants for the repowering of Wind Farms. Eng. Econ. 58, 282–303 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ziegler, L., Gonzalez, E., Rubert, T., Smolka, U. & Melero, J. J. Lifetime extension of onshore wind turbines: a review covering Germany, Spain, Denmark, and the UK. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 82, 1261–1271 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Scherhaufer, P., Höltinger, S., Salak, B., Schauppenlehner, T. & Schmidt, J. Patterns of acceptance and non-acceptance within energy landscapes: a case study on wind energy expansion in Austria. Energy Policy 109, 863–870 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Smallwood, K. S. in Wind Energy and Wildlife Interactions (ed. Köppel. J.) 175–187 (Springer 2017).

  9. 9.

    Steininger, G. Wind turbine repowering is on the horizon (L. Buchsbaum and S. Patel, interviewers) POWER Magazine (2016); https://www.powermag.com/wind-turbine-repowering-horizon/

  10. 10.

    Villena-Ruiz, R., Ramirez, F. J., Honrubia-Escribano, A. & Gómez-Lázaro, E. A techno-economic analysis of a real wind farm repowering experience: the Malpica case. Energy Convers. Manag. 172, 182–199 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Filgueira, A., Seijo, M. A., Munoz, E., Castro, L. & Piegari, L. Technical and economic study of two repowered wind farms in Bustelo and San Xoán, 24.7 MW and 15.84 MW respectively. In 2009 International Conference on Clean Electrical Power (ICCEP) (ICCEP, 2009); https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCEP.2009.5211998

  12. 12.

    Prabu, T. & Kottayil, S. K. Repowering a wind farm—a techno-economic approach. Wind Eng. 39, 385–397 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Nivedh, B., Devi, R. & Sreevalsan, E. Repowering of wind farms—a case study. Wind Eng. 37, 137–150 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Paul, A. & Prabu, T. Technical and economic feasibility study on repowering of wind farms. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 9, 1–9 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Goyal, M. Repowering—next big thing in India. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14, 1400–1409 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Del Río, P., Calvo Silvosa, A. & Iglesias Gómez, G. Policies and design elements for the repowering of wind farms: a qualitative analysis of different options. Energy Policy 39, 1897–1908 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Santos-Alamillos, F. J., Thomaidis, N. S., Usaola-García, J., Ruiz-Arias, J. A. & Pozo-Vázquez, D. Exploring the mean-variance portfolio optimization approach for planning wind repowering actions in Spain. Renew. Energy 106, 335–342 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Möller, B. Changing wind-power landscapes: regional assessment of visual impact on land use and population in Northern Jutland, Denmark. Appl. Energy 83, 477–494 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Himpler, S. & Madlener, R. Optimal timing of wind farm repowering: a two-factor real options analysis. J. Energy Mark. 7, 3–34 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wind Energy in Europe: Outlook to 2023 (WindEurope, 2019); https://windeurope.org/about-wind/reports/wind-energy-in-europe-outlook-to-2023/#download

  21. 21.

    Lacal-Arántegu, R., Iglesias, A. & María Yusta, J. Technology effects in repowering wind turbines. Wind Energy 23, 660–675 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Frantál, B. Have local government and public expectations of wind energy project benefits been met? Implications for repowering schemes. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 17, 217–236 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Martínez, E., Latorre-Biel, J. I., Jiménez, E., Sanz, F. & Blanco, J. Life cycle assessment of a wind farm repowering process. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 93, 260–271 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Manchado, C. et al. Wind farm repowering guided by visual impact criteria. Renew. Energy 135, 197–207 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Hötker, H., Thomsen, K.-M. & Jeromin, H. Impacts on Biodiversity of Exploitation of Renewable Energy Sources: the Example of Birds and Bats—Facts, Gaps in Knowledge, Demands for Further Research, and Ornithological Guidelines for the Development of Renewable Energy Exploitation (Michael-Otto-Institut for the Nature and Biodiversity Conservation Union, 2006).

  26. 26.

    Smallwood, K. S. & Karas, B. Avian and bat fatality rates at old-generation and repowered wind turbines in California. J. Wildl. Manage. 73, 1062–1071 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Marques, A. T. et al. Understanding bird collisions at wind farms: an updated review on the causes and possible mitigation strategies. Biol. Conserv. 179, 40–52 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ferri, V., Battisti, C. & Soccini, C. Bats in a Mediterranean mountainous landscape: does wind farm repowering induce changes at assemblage and species level? Environ. Manage. 57, 1240–1246 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Colmenar-Santos, A., Campíñez-Romero, S., Pérez-Molina, C. & Mur-Pérez, F. Repowering: An actual possibility for wind energy in Spain in a new scenario without feed-in-tariffs. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 41, 319–337 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Searchlist over all Plan Proposals and Plans Adopted Pursuant to the Planning Act (Danish Business Authority, 2019); kort.plandata.dk/searchlist/#/

  31. 31.

    Master Data Register for Wind Turbines—Data on Operating and Decommissioned Wind Turbines (Ultimo 02 2020) (Danish Energy Agency, accessed 26 March 2020; www.ens.dk/en/our-services/statistics-data-key-figures-and-energy-maps/overview-energy-sector

  32. 32.

    Afgifts og Tilskudsanalysen på Energiområdet—Delanalyse 6, Fremtidigt Tilskud til Landvind (Danish Ministry of Taxation, 2018); www.skm.dk/media/5361/afgifts-og-tilskudsanalysen-delanalyse-6.pdf

  33. 33.

    Bekendtgørelse om Planlægning for og Tilladelse til Opstilling af Vindmøller (Danish Ministry of Industry, Business and Financial Affairs, 2019); www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=210040

  34. 34.

    Vindmølleindustrien som Historisk Flagskib (Danish Energy Agency, 2011); www.ens.dk/sites/ens.dk/files/Vindenergi/vindmoelleindustrien_historisk_flagskib.pdf

  35. 35.

    Wind Energy Generation (Strategic Energy Technologies Information System, European Commission, 2013); setis.ec.europa.eu/system/files/Technology_Information_Sheet_Wind_Energy_Generation.pdf

  36. 36.

    Directive 2001/77/EC on the Promotion of Electricity Produced from Renewable Energy Sources in the Internal Energy Market OJ L 283/33 (European Parliament and Council, 2001).

  37. 37.

    Chatham House Rule (Chatham House, 2020); www.chathamhouse.org/chatham-house-rule

  38. 38.

    Vejledning om planlægning for og tilladelse til opstilling af vindmøller (Danish Nature Agency under the Ministry of Environment and Food of Denmark., 2015); www.naturstyrelsen.dk/media/131731/vejledning_06012015_web.pdf

  39. 39.

    Støj fra Vindmøller–Vejledning fra Miljøstyrelsen nr 1 (Environmental Protection Agency under the Ministry of Environment and Food of Denmark, 2012); www2.mst.dk/Udgiv/publikationer/2012/05/978-87-92903-08-2.pdf

  40. 40.

    Vejledning om VVM i Planloven (Danish Nature Agency under the Ministry of Environment and Food of Denmark, 2009); www.naturstyrelsen.dk/media/nst/9948968/vvm_vejledning2.pdf

  41. 41.

    Integration of Wind Power (Ea Energianalyse, 2015); www.ea-energianalyse.dk/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/1550_Integration_vindkraft_viking_link_og_andre_tiltag-2.pdf

  42. 42.

    Uihlein, A., Telsnig, T. & Vazquez Hernandez, C. JRC Wind Energy Database (Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, 2019).

  43. 43.

    Lacal-Arántegui, R. & Uihlein, A. Repowering wind turbines—analysis of the effects of technology substitution in repowered wind farms. Appl. Energy 23, 660–675 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work constitutes a contribution to the research in the international working group IEA TCP Wind Task 26 (Cost of Wind Energy). We thank all the members of the group for their extraordinary collaboration and essential comments on our work that formed this article. The work was in part funded by the Danish Public Energy Technology Development and Demonstration Program (EUDP), project no. 64018-0577. This Article constitutes a contribution from the European Commission to IEA Task 26 research. The views expressed are purely those of the authors and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission. This work was authored (in part) by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the US Department of Energy under Contract no. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Funding was provided by the US Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Wind Energy Technologies Office. The views expressed in the Article do not necessarily represent the views of the DOE or the US Government. The US Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for US Government purposes.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Energy Economics and Regulation Group, Department of Technology, Management and Economics, DTU Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark

    Lena Kitzing & Morten Kofoed Jensen

  2. European Commission—Joint Research Centre, Petten, the Netherlands

    Thomas Telsnig

  3. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA

    Eric Lantz

Authors
  1. Lena Kitzing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Morten Kofoed Jensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas Telsnig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eric Lantz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.K. and M.K.J. conceived the study, developed the analysis and undertook the interviews. M.K.J. led the data processing and analysis, with support from L.K. E.L. and T.T. contributed with international data. All the authors contributed to data analysis and interpretation. All the authors wrote and edited the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lena Kitzing.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Notes 1–3, Figs. 1–4 and Table 1.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Data 1

Full dataset, source data for tables and figures.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kitzing, L., Jensen, M.K., Telsnig, T. et al. Multifaceted drivers for onshore wind energy repowering and their implications for energy transition. Nat Energy 5, 1012–1021 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00717-1

Download citation

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing