Abstract
Recent evidence shows that carbon emissions in China are likely to peak ahead of 2030. However, the social and economic impacts of such an early carbon peak have rarely been assessed. Here we focus on the economic costs and health benefits of different carbon mitigation pathways, considering both possible socio-economic futures and varying ambitions of climate policies. We find that an early peak before 2030 in line with the 1.5 °C target could avoid ~118,000 and ~614,000 PM2.5 attributable deaths under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 1, in 2030 and 2050, respectively. Under the 2 °C target, carbon mitigation costs could be more than offset by health co-benefits in 2050, bringing a net benefit of $393–$3,017 billion (in 2017 USD value). This study not only provides insight into potential health benefits of an early peak in China, but also suggests that similar benefits may result from more ambitious climate targets in other countries.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 1.5 °C Special Report, the rise in global average surface temperatures could reach 1.5 °C between 2030 and 2052, posing great threats to human and natural systems1. Failure to act on climate change would result in huge socio-economic losses, potentially far outweighing the mitigation costs2. It is thus urgent to implement climate policies to curb the continuous rise in emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs). As the largest carbon emitter in the world, China recently vowed to peak its carbon dioxide emissions before 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality before 2060, strengthening the earlier commitments of its nationally determined contribution (NDC) under the Paris Agreement to peak carbon “around” 2030. The carbon neutrality pledge also signaled that China is scaling up the ambition of its NDC as agreed in Paris.
Given many shared anthropogenic sources of GHGs and air pollutants, mitigation policies aimed at CO2 reductions could bring health co-benefits from abated air pollution3,4. At a global level, the costs of reducing GHGs emissions could be more than offset by the health co-benefits by 20505. Yet the cost-benefit ratios of achieving NDC targets differ between developed and developing countries. Developing countries like India and China would gain considerable health benefits via air pollution abatement, up to 3–9 times the implementation costs in 20506, whereas the comparable ratios in the European Union and USA would be relatively modest, at 7–84% and 10–41%, respectively5.
Notably, China’s carbon emissions peak is now estimated to occur ahead of 2030, the year of its NDC target, owing to structural economic changes and enhanced emission reduction actions. As projected in our previous research, emissions for China may peak before 2025, at least 5 years ahead of China’s Paris target of 20307, and other recent studies have likewise shown realistic paths to surpass the NDC target8,9. With the peak year moving forward significantly, existing literature based on China’s NDC commitment likely overestimates its projected cumulative CO2 emissions and underestimates related co-benefits in air quality and public health10. Investigation into the social and economic impacts of such an early carbon peak in China, moreover, is still scarce. Besides, consideration of the diversity of climate change paths remains insufficient in the existing studies on the synergistic impact of climate policy on air quality11.
This study, a comprehensive assessment of air quality and health co-benefits of climate policies in China, applies an integrated assessment framework (Fig. 1, see details in the “Methods”) to estimate the air quality and health co-benefits under different carbon mitigation pathways. We utilize chemical transport modeling and health risk assessment to quantify the cooperative effects of climate polices on ambient PM2.5 concentrations and the mortality from long-term PM2.5 exposure. We find that implementation of climate policies in China would reduce PM2.5-related mortality and yield huge health co-benefits, especially in the long run. The more stringent the climate policy is, the greater the health benefits it would bring. The health co-benefits could fully offset the carbon mitigation costs in the long-term, to 2050. However, the co-benefits of climate policies alone will not be enough to realize China’s air quality goals and prevent the growth of the PM2.5-related health burden before 2050, especially given the increasing population aging.
Results and discussion
CO2 emission trajectory
Nine scenarios combining the characters of socio-economic developments and the ambitions of climate policies are considered in this study, represented respectively by the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) and Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs). When a specific long-term radiation forcing (RF) target (e.g., 2.6 W/m2 in 2100 under RCP2.6) is imposed as a quantitative constraint on the SSPs (e.g., SSP1, SSP2 or SSP5), the cumulative carbon emissions by 2100 are fixed to meet that RF level for various scenarios, labeled accordingly as SSP1_RCP2.6, SSP2_RCP2.6, and SSP5_RCP2.6 in Table 1. The set of climate policy assumptions (SSPx_RCPx) will thus determine the outcomes of the scenario analysis, including on energy structure and carbon trajectories (see Supplementary Note 1.2).
In China, industry and power generation are the two major sources of CO2 emissions12, contributing more than 80% of the total emissions in 2010 due to the sectors’ intensive use of fossil fuels, especially coal (Supplementary Table 2). Adjustment of the energy structure is the key to mitigating China’s CO2 emissions. For example, to achieve the 1.5 °C goal under the SSP1 pathway (i.e., SSP1_RCP1.9), the fossil fuel share of total primary energy would decline from 91.6% under SSP1_REF to 83.8% under SSP1_RCP1.9 in 2030, and from 85.2% to 42.9% in 2060 (Supplementary Fig. 2 and Note 1.3). And the share of biomass fuels and non-biomass renewable energy (e.g., solar and wind) under SSP1_RCP1.9 would respectively increase to 24.1% and 31.4% in 2060. A strong upscaling of non-fossil fuels (e.g., biomass fuels and nuclear power) also occurs in the SSP2_RCP1.9 and SSP5_RCP1.9 scenarios. Moreover, significant deployment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) seems to be an essential step, especially to achieve more ambitious climate targets in the future. For the SSP2 and SSP5 scenarios, most CO2 emissions from fossil fuels (~98%) and biomass fuels (~92%) used in electricity generation and industry would be captured and stored by 2050 (Supplementary Fig. 3).
The rapid shift away from fossil fuels towards zero- or low-carbon energy sources and increased use of CCS under a strict climate target would lead to substantial reduction in carbon emissions. As illustrated in Fig. 2, under all analyzed mitigation scenarios (i.e., RCP2.6 and RCP1.9), China’s CO2 emissions would peak at 10,423–15,500 Mt CO2 yr−1 in or before 2030, meeting the current NDC target of “around 2030” (Supplementary Table 1). Under the 1.5 °C scenarios (RCP1.9), the peak would occur earlier, around 2020 (10,645~11,901 Mt CO2 yr−1), meeting China’s newer peak year commitment of “before 2030.” Note also that China would be projected to achieve another NDC commitment of cutting CO2 emissions per unit gross domestic product (GDP) to 0.47 t-CO2/1000 USD, a reduction of 60% from 2005 levels, by 2030 in all scenarios (see Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 1).
Co-benefits for ambient air pollution
The implementation of climate policies to mitigate CO2 emissions would yield co-benefits in reduced air pollutant emissions in China (Fig. 3, Supplementary Figs. 4, 5). Emissions of air pollutants, with the exception of ammonia (NH3), decrease with reductions of CO2 emissions as the climate policy becomes more stringent. But the level of mitigation differs by pollutant species, mainly reflecting their specific sectoral sources (Fig. 3). For example, as energy use is the primary source of sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOX) and CO2 emissions12, CO2 mitigation measures such as reduced coal consumption bring great co-reductions in SO2 and NOX emissions. As the major sources of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), black carbon (BC) and organic carbon (OC) emissions do not overlap with major sources of CO2 (see Supplementary Table 3 and Table 5), it makes sense that the co-benefits of CO2 reductions on their emissions are not as significant as those of SO2 and NOX. In China, land use (including agriculture) produces almost all (>99%) of NH3 emissions, which are therefore barely affected by policies to mitigate CO2 in the scenarios. In fact, separate from the growing food demand that accompanies economic development, large amounts of biomass fuels are required in all climate policy scenarios (both RCP2.6 and RCP1.9) (Supplementary Fig. 2 and Note 3.1); both lead to increased ammonia emissions due to increased demand for and application of nitrogenous fertilizer (Fig. 3).
In 2015, the population-weighted concentration of PM2.5 (PWC-PM2.5) was 53.0 μg/m3 in China. The implementation of different climate policies will result in different levels of PM2.5 mitigation relative to the REF scenario (see Fig. 4a, Supplementary Table 6 and Fig. 7), and the climate policies will yield greater improvements to air quality in the long run, as they become more stringent. For example, the PWC-PM2.5 in the SSP1_RCP1.9 scenario is 50.9 μg/m3 in 2030 and 2.1 μg/m3 lower than that of the SSP1_REF scenario (Fig. 4b), while in 2050 it will decrease to 43.4 μg/m3 and 5.1 μg/m3 lower (Fig. 4c). Under the same socio-economic path (SSP), the RCP1.9 scenario has a lower PWC-PM2.5 than the RCP2.6 scenario. This implies that stricter climate policies would not only mitigate more CO2 emissions but also lead to greater air quality improvement. In 2050, SSP1_RCP1.9’s PWC-PM2.5 is 3.5 μg/m3 lower than that in the RCP2.6 scenario.
Nevertheless, the co-benefits of climate policies alone on air pollution mitigation are limited. With the most ambitious assumptions of the SSP1_RCP1.9 scenario, about 778 million people in China will still be exposed to ambient air with annual average PM2.5 concentrations above 35 μg/m3 in 2050. This will not meet the latest air quality objective declared in the country’s “Beautiful China” strategy, which aims to reduce PM2.5 concentrations in all Chinese cities to at most 35 μg/m3 by 2035. The co-benefits of climate policies will not be enough to realize China’s air quality goals, which will also require strengthening of dedicated air pollution control policies10.
It is notable that the PWC-PM2.5 of SSP1_RCP2.6 is slightly higher (0.4 μg/m3) than that of SSP1_REF in 2030 (Supplementary Fig. 8a). Especially for provinces with large agricultural outputs like Henan, Shandong, and Jiangsu13, their PWC-PM2.5 levels in the SSP1_RCP2.6_2030 scenario are higher than those in the SSP1_REF_2030 scenario, by 0.7, 0.5, and 0.5 μg/m3, respectively in these three provinces (see Supplementary Note 3.1). Because emissions of the acidic gases NOX and SO2 do not decline enough by 2030 under SSP1_RCP2.6, increasing NH3 emissions (Fig. 3) discussed above may hinder PM2.5 mitigation by enhancing formation of ammonium nitrate and sulfate14,15. These key forms of secondary PM2.5 comprise nearly 30% of China’s annual average concentration of PM2.516,17. See details in Supplementary Note 3.
Health benefits
In 2015, the deaths attributable to ambient PM2.5 exposures in China are estimated at 2,441,900 (95% CI, 2,052,000–2,809,100), recognizing that in reality the mortality impacts of chronic exposure to air pollution may be distributed over years or even decades after exposure18,19. In 2030, they grow to 3.6–3.9 million across all scenarios and increase to 6.4–7.5 million in 2050, with the elderly (>65 yr) particularly at risk (see Fig. 5, Supplementary Table 7). We find that aging of the population is the leading causal factor of such growth (see Supplementary Note 4), similar to previous studies20. This reinforces that relying on the co-benefits of climate policy alone will be insufficient to prevent the growth of the PM2.5-related health burden in China before 2050, especially given aging of the population.
Nevertheless, implementation of climate policies would yield considerable health co-benefits by reducing PM2.5-related mortality across all provinces in the analysis years of 2030 and 2050 (Fig. 6, Supplementary Table 8 and Fig. 9) compared to scenarios with no climate policy (SSPx_REF), except for SSP1_RCP2.6 in 2030 as discussed in the last section. And the more stringent the climate policy is, the greater the health benefits it would bring. For instance, the PM2.5-related deaths in SSP1_RCP1.9 are 3.7% and 6.1% lower than those in SSP1_RCP2.6 by 2030 and 2050, respectively (Fig. 6c and e). In addition, the health co-benefits of climate policies tend to increase in the longer run. For example, the PM2.5-related deaths in SSP1_RCP1.9 are 3.2% (118,000 deaths) and 8.7% (614,000 deaths) less than those in SSP1_REF, in 2030 and 2050, respectively (Fig. 6b and d). In addition to larger reductions in the long-run PM2.5 concentrations due to the reasons discussed above, sustained aging of the population exacerbates the baseline mortality risk of PM2.5 exposure (see Supplementary Note 4), both of which yield greater total reductions in PM2.5-related mortality in 2050 as a result of climate policies.
Applying estimates of mitigation costs and the value of statistical life (VSL) discussed in “Methods”, our analysis shows that the health co-benefits brought by CO2 emission reduction policies could fully offset the mitigation costs in the long-term, to 2050 (Table 2). Compared to the REF scenarios, SSP1_RCP2.6 and SSP5_RCP2.6 will produce net benefits of 393 billion and 3017 billion (in 2017 USD value) in 2050, respectively, equivalent to 0.45% and 2.77% of China’s GDP in 2050. Note that the mitigation cost mentioned here is from the Global Change Analysis Model (GCAM), which is an approximation of the welfare loss from emission mitigation efforts based on theoretical carbon tax revenue21,22. It refers to direct abatement costs such as those of new power plants and CCS technologies, but not the full macroeconomic costs in terms of GDP or consumption losses23. Co-reductions in air pollutant emissions under climate policies could also induce significant cost savings in pollution control, an additional co-benefit of climate policies that is not included in this study (see Supplementary Note 5.3).
Policy implications
The peak of China’s CO2 emissions is almost certain to occur at some point during 2020–2030. China could realize its NDC commitment by peaking CO2 emissions around 2030 under the 2 °C scenarios, and earlier, before 2030, under the 1.5 °C scenarios. The stricter the climate policy and the cleaner the socio-economic pathway, the earlier the peak of CO2 emissions will occur and the larger the air quality and public health co-benefits achieved in the long run. Such health co-benefits could substantially if not fully offset the costs of more stringent climate policies and bring significant net economic benefits in 2050.
China’s Ministry of Ecology and Environment has set up a Department of Climate Change to promote synergies between climate change mitigation and air pollution control policies. Our results imply that the path of sustainable, low-carbon social and economic development (SSP1) will bring great environmental and health benefits for China at an affordable cost, especially in the long run. Implementing climate policies as soon as possible, especially decarbonizing the energy structure and applying CCS in industry and power sectors, can not only ensure achievement of the emission reduction target set in China’s NDC, but also bring more net co-benefits in air quality, public health and the economy. However, relying on the air pollution co-benefits of such climate policies alone is insufficient to prevent the growth of PM2.5-related mortality in China, and it is also necessary to adopt other measures, including further tightened conventional pollution controls, greening infrastructure with alternative building materials, and designing cities to encourage low-emission lifestyles.
A climate policy that increases the share of biomass fuels will likely combine with growing food demand to increase use of chemical fertilizer and, therefore, NH3 emissions, potentially exacerbating PM2.5 pollution and related health burdens in some regions. Measures should be taken to effectively control NH3 emissions. These could include enhancing the nitrogen use efficiency of fertilizer application and optimizing the scale of agricultural operations24,25, which may also reduce emissions of N2O, another greenhouse gas26. Informed by improved understanding of complex air pollution formation mechanisms (including emissions, atmospheric transport, and secondary chemistry), future policy analyses should also attach greater importance to both synergies and trade-offs between climate change mitigation and air pollution control. Only through policies that coordinate control of air pollution and carbon emissions can policymakers maximize their total benefits.
Limitations
We used effects of PM2.5 exposures to estimate the total health burden caused by air pollution. While ignoring health effects of exposure to other air pollutants (e.g., O3 and NOX) may lead to underestimation, it is likely to be small because the health burden of PM2.5 is estimated to be around 6.2-fold greater than that of O3 on average27 and controversy exists about whether health effects of NOX double-count those of nitrate PM2.528. Also, the common approach of using mass concentrations of PM2.5 was used, disregarding composition, sources and particle size distribution. All of these characteristics may have different impacts on health29, but are commonly ignored in such studies as the epidemiological evidence is currently limited and inconsistent30,31.
In addition, uncertainties may be introduced by various factors in the integrated assessment model, GCAM, including methods of model application, selection of representative technologies and parameterization, and choice of the base year32. As we attempted to isolate the impact of climate policy on air pollution, we also did not consider special policies of future air quality control in our scenario analysis. For example, air quality could be further improved if stronger agricultural nitrogen management is implemented in the future, for example increasing the efficiency of nitrogen use during fertilizer application and agricultural waste management24,33. Nevertheless, the GCAM results for different scenarios here are reasonable, showing consistent trends in emissions of CO2 and air pollutants with the results of the other five integrated assessment models selected by the IPCC23.
Finally, since we mainly focus on the air pollution and health co-benefits of carbon reduction, the meteorological fields (from 2015) were assumed to remain the same for all scenarios and years, to eliminate possible confounding effects of climate change. Similarly, due to the lack of projected baseline mortality data for 2030 and 2050, we assume that the baseline mortality rates will remain the same as 2015 in the future.
Methods
In this study, an integrated assessment framework was applied to investigate the economic costs and health benefits under different emission mitigation pathways in China (Fig. 1). Estimations of CO2 and air pollutant emissions under SSP-RCP scenarios were obtained from GCAM. Then, the ambient PM2.5 concentrations and related mortalities under each scenario were quantified by combining the Weather Research and Forecasting Model Coupled with Chemistry (WRF-Chem) and the Global Exposure Mortality Model (GEMM). Finally, the health benefits were monetized using VSL, and then compared to the costs of implementing the climate policies.
Scenarios of future socio-economic status and emissions
In this paper, nine scenarios are selected across two dimensions (Table 1) to analyze the health co-benefits of climate polices in China. One dimension is socio-economic developments, i.e., the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways or SSPs34. The SSPs are defined along two different axes: challenges to climate mitigation and challenges to adaptation (see Supplementary Note 1.1). To investigate the effect of climate policies on air pollution, decarbonization paths for energy systems are the major focus in this study. We emphasize conditions resulting from different levels of climate mitigation. Additionally, to take account of the UN sustainable development goals and the general trend of globalization, SSPs with relatively low challenges to adaption (SSP1 and SSP5) but with different levels of climate mitigation challenges, i.e., SSP1 (low), SSP2 (medium) and SSP5 (high), are considered. SSP1 describes a world “taking the green road” with fewer adaptation and mitigation challenges, in which the population will peak in mid-century and then decline, while global per capita GDP will increase significantly. SSP5 describes a high-tech yet fossil-fuel-oriented world, with highly energy-intensive lifestyles. And SSP2 assumes a middle development path. The challenge of climate mitigation gradually increases in SSP1, SSP2, and SSP5.
The other dimension is the ambition of climate policies, using the Representative Concentration Pathways or RCPs. The REF assumes no policies explicitly designed to limit climate change. RCP2.6 and RCP1.9 assume paths limiting radiative forcing to 2.6 W/m2 and 1.9 W/m2 in 2100, exploring the possibility of limiting the rise in global mean surface temperature below 2 °C and 1.5 °C, respectively.
The SSP baseline scenarios (SSPx-REF) are developed with a set of qualitative assumptions given by the SSPs in the absence of climate polices. As the long-term radiation forcing target (from an RCP) is imposed on the SSP baselines as a quantitative constraint, the cumulative carbon emissions by 2100 are fixed (see Supplementary Note 1.2). This set of climate policy assumptions will have strong implications for the outcomes of the scenario analysis, including the energy structure and carbon trajectories. As above, the differences of air pollutant emissions between SSPx-REF and SSPx-RCPs reflect the synergistic effects of climate policies on air pollution control, such as accelerating clean energy deployment or constraints on land use change.
Here, we use the demographic and economic assumptions developed by KC and Lutz35 and Dellink et al.36, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 6. We also apply emission projections and potential mitigation costs from top-down simulations by GCAM in the selected SSP_RCP scenarios37. GCAM, an integrated assessment model, has been broadly applied in climate and energy assessments, including the latest IPCC Assessment Report38. The GCAM model searches for the equilibrium solution of carbon prices that cause all markets to be cleared and all consistency conditions set by the SSPs and RCPs narratives to be satisfied under the SSP_RCP framework at each time step. Thus, the emissions of air pollutants are determined by both pollutant emission factors set in the SSPs (see Supplementary Note 1.3) and the final energy consumption jointly determined by the environmental policy settings in SSP baselines and the level of radiation forcing defined by the RCPs39 (see Supplementary Note 1.2).
In general, carbon emission controls are applied to each activity and are strengthened as GDP rises, representing the historical trend that more stringent pollution control measures will be adopted as income levels increase5. The mitigation of non-CO2 GHGs is addressed by using parameterized functions for Marginal Abatement Cost (MAC) curves to change emission factors over time (see Supplementary Note 1.4). The mitigation cost from GCAM is an approximation of the welfare loss from emissions mitigation efforts by considering theoretical carbon tax revenue21,22. It can be thought of as the direct abatement cost (e.g., costs of new power plants, CCS technologies, etc.), but not the full macroeconomic costs in terms of GDP or consumption losses23. The model provides the mitigation costs of different energy and climate policies for each specific region.
Simulation of surface PM2.5 concentration
According to the ambition of the landmark 2015 Paris Agreement to limit the increase in global average surface temperatures well below 2 °C, we compared the scenarios with or without climate policies seeking a maximum 2 °C temperature rise, i.e., RCP2.6 and REF, under the least and greatest socio-economic challenges to mitigation, i.e., SSP1 and SSP5, respectively. In addition, the SSP1_RCP1.9 scenario was added, in line with China’s raised recent ambitions and the stricter goal of 1.5 °C in the Paris Agreement. Thus, 11 parallel experiments were designed, including the base run in 2015 and 10 runs for 5 selected scenarios (i.e., SSP1_REF, SSP1_RCP2.6, SSP1_RCP1.9, SSP5_REF and SSP5_RCP2.6), in 2030 and 2050, respectively. Coupled dynamical and chemical simulations were conducted using WRF-Chem, version 3.6.1, and incorporated additional pathways of secondary pollution enhancement in China based on our previous studies40. The model has been demonstrated to reproduce pollution in China well and is widely used in previous studies, including our own41,42.
Consistent with previous studies, we selected the meteorological fields of a given year (2015) and conducted simulations of four representative months (January, April, July, October) for all scenarios43. The domain covers the Greater China region, including mainland China and part of East Asia, at a grid resolution of 20 km × 20 km. MIX, the mosaic Asian anthropogenic emission inventory developed by Tsinghua University44, was applied for the 2015 base run, while emissions in future scenarios were developed from GCAM model results37. The estimated biogenic inventory provided by MEGAN (the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature) was also used45. The model configurations are given in detail in Supplementary Note 2.1.
We evaluated the simulated PM2.5 concentration against ground-based observations from almost 1500 stations (see Supplementary Note 2.3). Generally, our model well captures the seasonal variation and spatial distribution of PM2.5 concentration, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of ~0.81 at the annual average level (Supplementary Fig. 10). In addition, satellite-derived PM2.5 concentrations46 were used to further calibrate simulations and estimate PM2.5 exposures for all scenarios, similar to our previous study47.
Estimation of the health impacts
Exposure to ambient air pollution, especially PM2.5, is a leading global health concern48. PM2.5 is currently the dominant contributor to mortality from long-term exposure to air pollution, adverse health impacts of which have been proved by extensive cohort epidemiological studies49. Thus, we focus on the health effects of long-term exposure to ambient PM2.5. We apply GEMM to estimate deaths attributable to ambient PM2.5 exposure for noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) and lower respiratory infections (LRIs) in China under the various scenarios50. The relative risk (RR) functions for GEMM were constructed on the basis of 41 cohort studies of outdoor air pollution exposures in 16 countries, including a recent cohort study in China51. The attributable-fraction type relationship presented in Eq. (1) was used to calculate the mortality attributable to outdoor PM2.5 exposure.
where
where, \({M}_{g,i,j}\) is the mortality and \({P}_{g,i}\) is the population of grid cell \(g\) for disease i and age group j; \({I}_{i,j}\) is the reported national average annual disease (mortality) incidence rate for disease i, age group j; \({C}_{g}\) represents the PM2.5 concentration in cell \(g\); \({{RR}}_{g,i,j}({C}_{g})\) is the relative risk at concentration \({C}_{g}\); \(\overline{{{RR}}_{g,i,j}}\) represents the average population-weighted relative risk; \(\hat{{I}_{i,j}}\) represents the hypothetical “underlying incidence” (cause-specific mortality rate) that would remain if PM2.5 concentrations were reduced to the theoretical minimum risk concentration (i.e., 2.4 μg/m3).
where, 2.4 μg/m3 is the threshold concentration; \(\theta\), \(\alpha\), \(\mu\) \(v\) are fitted parameters of the concentration response functions for a given disease j provided by Burnett et al. (2018).
Here, we apply the disease incidence in 2015 derived from the Global Burden of Disease Results Tool 2017 version (GBD2017). For population size and spatial distribution, the LandScan Global Database (v2018) is adopted for 2015, and the projected population scenarios in SSPs are from NCAR’s IAM group and the City University of New York Institute for Demographic Research52,53. Age structure in 2015 and future scenarios are from GBD2017 and SSP database35, respectively.
The health effects of the climate policies are represented by differences (\(\triangle {M}_{{{{{{{\rm{RCPs}}}}}}}}\)) in the number of deaths attributable to air pollution between the RCP scenarios and their corresponding REF scenario, calculated by Eq. (5).
As the shape and parameters of the exposure–response (E–R) function are one the most important source of uncertainties in health impacts analysis47, we take the uncertainties in the E–R function as the uncertainties of estimated PM2.5-related mortality similar to previous studies54,55. Finally, the ~95% CI are calculated by inserting standard errors of GEMM parameters into the E–R function (see details in Supplementary Note 5.1).
In contrast with GEMM’s exclusive reliance on outdoor air pollution, the integrated exposure–response (IER) model adopted by the GBD incorporates risk information from both ambient PM2.5 pollution and other sources (e.g., secondhand smoke, household use of solid fuels). As suggested by a census-based epidemiological study, the GEMM results are better aligned with outcomes than the IER results in China56. The differences between effect estimates given by different relative risk functions (i.e., GEMM, IER2017) are analyzed in Supplementary Note 5.1.
Valuation of the health benefits
To quantify the benefit of avoided mortality risks, we applied the Value of Statistical Life (VSL) to monetize the estimated health impacts. The VSL values in each scenario and year are calculated via Eq. (6),
where \({{{\mbox{VSL}}}}_{{{\mbox{baseline}}}}\) is the VSL value of a baseline year and MVSL is the adopted marginal VSL between the target and base years related to per capita disposable income (\({{{\mbox{INC}}}}_{{{\mbox{percap}}}}\)). And we adopt contingent valuation conducted in Chongqing which presented a linear relationship between VSL and income (i.e., VSL increased by 14,550 USD with annual income increases of 145.8 USD)57,58. Given the huge disparities between VSL values derived from different studies, even by one order of magnitude55, we calculated the VSL results in target years based several local studies in China for comparison. Moreover, since diverse VSL calculation methods may also lead to inconsistent results, we also calculated results on the basis of US EPA methodology59 in Supplementary Note 5.2. These results are much higher than the values calculated using local estimates from China. Considering that local estimates are more in line with local situation and more applicable, we opted to apply locally investigated results from Hammitt et al.60. See details in Supplementary Note 5.2.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The GCAM representation of the SSPs are supported by Calvin et al.37. The reanalysis data FNL can be downloaded from website: https://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds083.2/. The anthropogenic emission data MIX are available at website: http://meicmodel.org. The GEMM fit parameters are available at website: https://github.com/mszyszkowicz/DataGEMM. Baseline mortality information and age structure can be obtained using GBD Results Tool (version 2017) at website: https://gbd2017.healthdata.org/gbd-search/. Future age structure in SSP scenarios are available at website: https://tntcat.iiasa.ac.at/SspDb/. The LandScan population data are available at website: https://landscan.ornl.gov/. The future population size and spatial distribution for the SSPs can be obtained from website: https://www.cgd.ucar.edu/iam/modeling/spatial-population-scenarios.html. Additional data related to our results are available at figshare data publisher: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_rar/17648891 or on request from the corresponding authors.
Code availability
The source code of the WRF-Chem model is archived on UCAR data repository (http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/download). The code for assessing the PM2.5 health burden used in this study are available at website: https://github.com/evanliu3594/PM2.5-attr-mort). Data analysis and visualization in this study are mainly based on NCAR Command Language (NCL v6.4.1, https://www.ncl.ucar.edu/). Data processing techniques are available on request from the corresponding authors.
References
Masson-Delmotte, V. et al. IPCC, 2018: Global Warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty (2018).
Hong, C. et al. Impacts of climate change on future air quality and human health in China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 17193–17200 (2019).
Li, M. et al. Air quality co-benefits of carbon pricing in China. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 398–403 (2018).
Scovronick, N. et al. The impact of human health co-benefits on evaluations of global climate policy. Nat. Commun. 10, 2095 (2019).
Markandya, A. et al. Health co-benefits from air pollution and mitigation costs of the Paris Agreement: a modelling study. Lancet Planet. Health 2, e126–e133 (2018).
Cai, W. et al. The Lancet Countdown on PM2·5 pollution-related health impacts of China’s projected carbon dioxide mitigation in the electric power generation sector under the Paris Agreement: a modelling study. Lancet Planet. Health 2, e151–e161 (2018).
Wang, H. et al. China’s CO2 peak before 2030 implied from characteristics and growth of cities. Nat. Sustain. 2, 748–754 (2019).
Fang, K. et al. How can China achieve its Intended Nationally Determined Contributions by 2030? A multi-criteria allocation of China’s carbon emission allowance. Appl. Energy 241, 380–389 (2019).
Rogelj, J. et al. A new scenario logic for the Paris Agreement long-term temperature goal. Nature 573, 357–363 (2019).
Xing, J. et al. The quest for improved air quality may push China to continue its CO2 reduction beyond the Paris Commitment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 29535–29542 (2020).
Cheng, J. et al. Pathways of China’s PM2.5 air quality 2015–2060 in the context of carbon neutrality. National Science Review, https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwab078 (2021).
Zheng, B. et al. Trends in China’s anthropogenic emissions since 2010 as the consequence of clean air actions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 14095–14111 (2018).
Ning, Q. & Hu, L. China Agricultural Statistical Yearbook 2018. (China Agricultural Press, 2018).
Liu, M. et al. Rapid SO2 emission reductions significantly increase tropospheric ammonia concentrations over the North China Plain. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 17933–17943 (2018).
Lachatre, M. et al. The unintended consequence of SO2 and NO2 regulations over China: increase of ammonia levels and impact on PM2.5 concentrations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 6701–6716 (2019).
Xue, W., Xu, Y., Tang, X., Lei, Y. & Wang, J. Impacts of ammonia emission on PM2.5 pollution in China. China Environ. Sci. 36, 3531–3539 (2016).
Liu, M. et al. Ammonia emission control in China would mitigate haze pollution and nitrogen deposition, but worsen acid rain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 7760 (2019).
Wang, H. et al. Health benefits of on-road transportation pollution control programs in China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 117, 25370–25377 (2020).
Walton, H. in The Mortality Effects of Long-Term Exposure to Particulate Matter in the United Kingdom (2010).
Yue, H., He, C., Huang, Q., Yin, D. & Bryan, B. A. Stronger policy required to substantially reduce deaths from PM2.5 pollution in China. Nat. Commun. 11, 1462 (2020).
Calvin, K. et al. Trade-offs of different land and bioenergy policies on the path to achieving climate targets. Climatic Change 123, 691–704 (2014).
Bradley, R. A., Watts, E. C. & Williams, E. R. Limiting Net Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the United States (United States, 1991).
Riahi, K. et al. The shared socioeconomic pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 153–168 (2017).
Guo, Y. et al. Air quality, nitrogen use efficiency and food security in China are improved by cost-effective agricultural nitrogen management. Nat. Food 1, 648–658 (2020).
Wu, Y. et al. Policy distortions, farm size, and the overuse of agricultural chemicals in China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 7010 (2018).
Wang, X. et al. Responses of greenhouse gas emissions to residue returning in China’s croplands and influential factors: A meta-analysis. J. Environ. Manag. 289, 112486 (2021).
Forouzanfar, M. H. et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 388, 1659–1724 (2016).
Faustini, A., Rapp, R. & Forastiere, F. Nitrogen dioxide and mortality: review and meta-analysis of long-term studies. Eur. Respir. J. 44, 744–753 (2014).
Lelieveld, J., Evans, J. S., Fnais, M., Giannadaki, D. & Pozzer, A. The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature 525, 367–371 (2015).
Turner, M. C. et al. Outdoor air pollution and cancer: an overview of the current evidence and public health recommendations. CA: Cancer J. Clin. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21632 (2020).
Hamra, G. B. et al. Outdoor particulate matter exposure and lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Health Persp. 122, 906–911 (2014).
Krey, V. et al. Looking under the hood: a comparison of techno-economic assumptions across national and global integrated assessment models. Energy 172, 1254–1267 (2019).
Gu, B., Sutton, M. A., Chang, S. X., Ge, Y. & Chang, J. Agricultural ammonia emissions contribute to China’s urban air pollution. Front. Ecol. Environ. 12, 265–266 (2014).
O’Neill, B. C. et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Climatic Change 122, 387–400 (2014).
KC, S. & Lutz, W. The human core of the shared socioeconomic pathways: Population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 181–192 (2017).
Dellink, R., Chateau, J., Lanzi, E. & Magné, B. Long-term economic growth projections in the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 200–214 (2017).
Calvin, K. et al. The SSP4: A world of deepening inequality. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 284–296 (2017).
Pachauri, R. & Reisinger, A. Climate change 2014: synthesis report. contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. J. Roman. Stud. 4, 85–88 (2014).
Kriegler, E. et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared climate policy assumptions. Climatic Change 122, 401–414 (2014).
Huang, X. et al. Pathways of sulfate enhancement by natural and anthropogenic mineral aerosols in China. J. Geophys Res. Atmos. 119, 14,165–114,179 (2014).
Huang, X. et al. Enhanced secondary pollution offset reduction of primary emissions during COVID-19 lockdown in China. Nat. Sci. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa137 (2020).
Tang, R., Huang, X., Zhou, D. & Ding, A. Biomass-burning-induced surface darkening and its impact on regional meteorology in eastern China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 6177–6191 (2020).
Zhang, Y. et al. Quantifying regional consumption-based health impacts attributable to ambient air pollution in China. Environ. Int. 112, 100–106 (2018).
Li, M. et al. MIX: a mosaic Asian anthropogenic emission inventory under the international collaboration framework of the MICS-Asia and HTAP. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 935–963 (2017).
Guenther, A. B. et al. The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions. Geosci. Model Dev. 5, 1471–1492 (2012).
Ma, Z., Liu, R., Liu, Y. & Bi, J. Effects of air pollution control policies on PM2.5 pollution improvement in China from 2005 to 2017: a satellite-based perspective. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 6861–6877 (2019).
Wang, H. et al. Trade-driven relocation of air pollution and health impacts in China. Nat. Commun. 8, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00918-5 (2017).
Burnett, R. & Cohen, A. Relative risk functions for estimating excess mortality attributable to outdoor PM2.5 air pollution: Evolution and State-of-the-Art. Atmosphere 11, 589 (2020).
Cohen, A. J. et al. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015. Lancet 389, 1907–1918 (2017).
Burnett, R. et al. Global estimates of mortality associated with long-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 9592–9597 (2018).
Yin, P. et al. Long-term fine particulate matter exposure and nonaccidental and cause-specific mortality in a large national cohort of Chinese men. ENviron. Health Persp. 125, 117002 (2017).
Gao, J. Downscaling Global Spatial Population Projections from 1/8-degree to 1-km Grid Cells (No. NCAR/TN-537+STR). https://doi.org/10.5065/D60Z721H (2017).
Jones, B. & O’Neill, B. C. Spatially explicit global population scenarios consistent with the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 084003 (2016).
Hong, C. et al. Weakening aerosol direct radiative effects mitigate climate penalty on Chinese air quality. Nat. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0840-y (2020).
Liang, X. et al. Air quality and health benefits from fleet electrification in China. Nat. Sustain. 2, 962–971 (2019).
Xue, T. et al. Change in the number of PM2.5-attributed deaths in China from 2000 to 2010: comparison between estimations from census-based epidemiology and pre-established exposure-response functions. Environ. Int. 129, 430–437 (2019).
Zhang, M., Song, Y., Cai, X. & Zhou, J. Economic assessment of the health effects related to particulate matter pollution in 111 Chinese cities by using economic burden of disease analysis. J. Environ. Manag. 88, 947–954 (2008).
Wang, H., Mullahy, J., Chen, D., Wang, L. & Peng, R. Willingness to pay for reducing the risk of death by improving air quality: a contingent valuation study in Chongqing, China. In the Third International Health Economic Association Conference. (York, UK, 2001)
EPA, U. S. Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses. (National Center for Environmental Economics Office of Policy, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2014).
Hammitt, J. K., Geng, F., Guo, X. & Nielsen, C. P. Valuing mortality risk in China: comparing stated-preference estimates from 2005 and 2016. J. Risk Uncertain. 58, 167–186 (2019).
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFA0600204), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71974092), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (0207-14380055, 0207-14380174), the Frontiers Science Center for Critical Earth Material Cycling, Nanjing University and an award to the Harvard–China Project on Energy, Economy and Environment from the Harvard Global Institute. The authors thank Kate Calvin from the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory for providing the GCAM results of the SSP_RCP scenarios and John Evans from the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health for helping to evaluate the uncertainty of health impacts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.W. designed research; J.Z., R.T., and Y.L. performed research; R.T., J.Z., X.H., Y.Z., D.Z., A.D., and H.W. analyzed data; and R.T., J.Z., H.W., and C.P.N. wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Denise Mauzerall, Xue Qiao, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tang, R., Zhao, J., Liu, Y. et al. Air quality and health co-benefits of China’s carbon dioxide emissions peaking before 2030. Nat Commun 13, 1008 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28672-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28672-3
This article is cited by
-
Co-benefits of transport demand reductions from compact urban development in Chinese cities
Nature Sustainability (2024)
-
Measuring the synergy of air pollution and CO2 emission in Chinese urban agglomerations: an evaluation from the aggregate impact and correlation perspectives
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment (2024)
-
Using the Value of a Statistical Life to Measure the Benefit from the Clean Air Act: Comment
Atlantic Economic Journal (2024)
-
The global power sector’s low-carbon transition may enhance sustainable development goal achievement
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Approaching national climate targets in China considering the challenge of regional inequality
Nature Communications (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.