In a finding that could have implications for vaccine design, memory immune cells at mucosal surfaces have been shown to respond to encounters with pathogens by issuing signals that recruit other memory cells to the site.
The immune system clears pathogens it has encountered before more efficiently than those of an initial infection because specialized cells, known as memory cells, can remember and rapidly eliminate them. This process is the bedrock of all vaccines. Writing in Nature Immunology, Schenkel et al.1 show that, in mice, a small number of memory cells that reside near sites of pathogen entry sound an alarm that recruits more memory cells from the blood to rapidly boost defences at the front line of a subsequent infection.
Most infections are initiated by pathogens that breach epithelial surfaces, such as the skin and the mucous membranes that line the genital, respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts. The immune system responds through the orchestrated actions of innate and adaptive immune cells. Innate cells are distributed throughout the body in large numbers; they can immediately identify and respond to pathogens, but they lack specificity and often fail to control an infection on their own. However, the B cells and T cells of the adaptive immune system have surface receptors that allow them to respond in a specific manner; they also have diverse mechanisms to eliminate infections. For example, in the case of CD8+ T cells, receptor binding by a specific pathogen activates the cells such that they start producing immunomodulatory cytokine proteins and acquire a killing function. However, adaptive cells that are specific to any one pathogen are exceedingly rare and, to function, they first need to proliferate. This takes time, and so, in the meantime, innate immune cells attempt to control pathogen spread.
An important function of innate cells is to produce chemokines, a subset of cytokines that attracts other immune cells to the site of infection (Fig. 1a). In addition, some innate cells travel through the 'highways' of the lymphatic system to bring pathogens or pathogen debris to nearby lymph nodes and other lymphoid organs, where naive B and T cells (those that have not yet been activated) normally reside. Here, the few B and T cells that recognize the pathogen undergo massive proliferation, become activated and migrate to the site of initial infection. For pathogens that remain at this site, such as papillomaviruses or the influenza virus, this response may be enough to eliminate the infection. However, many pathogens, including the viruses that cause chickenpox, smallpox and measles, can proliferate in the lymph nodes and escape through lymph vessels to access the circulatory system and invade other organs2,3. In such cases, CD8+ T cells must enter those organs to eliminate the pathogen.
Although most of the responding CD8+ T cells die after an infection subsides, a fraction of pathogen-specific, but deactivated, cells persists at frequencies that are substantially higher than before the infection. Some of these memory cells take up residence in lymphoid organs, others circulate in the blood and yet others remain in non-lymphoid tissues as resident memory T cells (TRM cells)4,5. TRM cells can be found in skin and mucosal tissues, and are able to rapidly secrete cytokines and kill infected cells on recognition of a pathogen4 (Fig. 1b). Thus, these memory cells are spatially and temporally poised to be the first line of defence against reinfection. Studies in mice have shown6,7 that TRM cells in the skin and vaginal tract can limit viral spread during localized infection. Now, Schenkel et al. show how TRM cells communicate with circulating memory cells to swell the cellular army for battle at the site of a recall infection.
Schenkel and colleagues provide strong evidence that, like innate immune cells, TRM cells in the vaginal mucosa have an alarm function — by rapidly producing the cytokine IFN-γ, the TRM cells induce surrounding innate immune cells and vascular cells to express chemokines. One of these chemokines is CXCL9, a molecule that has been shown to attract T cells to the vaginal tract6. The authors observed that, by sounding the IFN-γ alarm, TRM cells rapidly recruit large numbers of additional memory CD8+ T cells from the blood to the site of infection. Notably, the TRM-cell-induced chemokine response was faster and larger than that of an innate response. Furthermore, only memory CD8+ T cells, which are poised for a rapid response, were recruited; naive CD8+ T cells were not. It should be noted, however, that after immunization and rechallenge of mice with the vaccinia virus, TRM cells in the skin reduce viral proliferation in the absence of circulating T cells7; this suggests that the alarm function is absent or dispensable in some infection circumstances. Thus, future studies should determine the relevance of this alarm function in different tissues and disease settings.
By activating their own effector functions and calling additional memory CD8+ T cells to the site of infection, it is possible that TRM cells not only directly and indirectly decrease infection at the primary site, but also reduce pathogen spread to the lymph nodes. Memory CD8+ T cells in the lymph nodes curb the spread of viruses to the blood and other organs8,9. By reducing spread to lymph nodes, TRM cells might reduce some of their burden. In the end, the more roadblocks the immune system creates to prevent pathogen spread, the fewer chances there are for a pathogen to cause disease.
Vaccines that induce TRM cells could prove to be effective against pathogens that are resistant to existing vaccine strategies. Indeed, work in mice has shown6 that, after vaccination, a population of TRM cells specific for herpes simplex virus 2 can be established in the vaginal mucosa by topical application of CXCL9, and that this results in reduced spread of this virus after subsequent infection. Schenkel and colleagues' findings suggest that, for an optimal front-line response, vaccines should induce both a TRM-cell population and circulating memory T cells that can respond to the TRM cells' alarm.
References
Schenkel, J. M., Fraser, K. A., Vezys, V. & Masopust, D. Nature Immunol. 14, 509–513 (2013).
Virgin, H. W. in Fields' Virology Vol. 1 (eds Fields, B. N., Knipe, D. M. & Howley, P. M.) 335–336 (Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007).
Flint, S. J., Enquist, L. W., Racaniello, V. R. & Skalka, A. M. Principles of Virology 3rd edn (ASM Press, 2009).
Gebhardt, T. & Mackay, L. K. Front. Immunol. 3, 340 (2012).
Jameson, S. C. & Masopust, D. Immunity 31, 859–871 (2009).
Shin, H. & Iwasaki, A. Nature 491, 463–467 (2012).
Jiang, X. et al. Nature 483, 227–231 (2012).
Remakus, S. et al. Cell Host Microbe (in the press).
Xu, R. H., Fang, M., Klein-Szanto, A. & Sigal, L. J. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 10992–10997 (2007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith-Garvin, J., Sigal, L. Memory cells sound the alarm. Nature 497, 194–196 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/497194b
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/497194b
This article is cited by
-
CSBF/C10orf99, a novel potential cytokine, inhibits colon cancer cell growth through inducing G1 arrest
Scientific Reports (2014)