Abstract
The objective of the study was to evaluate unilateral nerve sparing prostate surgery. Patient files of men who underwent unilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy were analyzed retrospectively after a minimum follow-up period of 18 months. Of 46 patients who received unilateral nerve sparing surgery, 14 (30.4%) regained full potency after surgery. In 92.9% of these patients, recovery occurred within a period of 18 months. Age is the single most important factor in the recuperation of potency after unilateral nerve sparing surgery. Most of the patients (84.8%) reported the ability to achieve orgasm. Of eight patients with positive section margins, two had positive section margins at the spared side only. Unilateral nerve sparing surgery remains a feasible treatment option for prostate cancer.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 4 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $64.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Walsh PC, Donker PJ . Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 1982; 128: 492–497.
Noldus J, Graefen M, Hammerer P, et al. Entwicklung der Tumorselektion anhand des pathologischen Stadiums beim klinisch lokalisierten Prostatakarzinom. Urologe A 1998; 37 (2): 195–198.
Walsh PC, Partin AW, Epstein JI . Cancer control and quality of life following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: results at 10 years. J Urol 1994; 152: 1831–1836.
Catalona WJ, Basler JW . Potency, continence and complication rates en 1870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 1999; 162: 433–438.
Geary ES, Dendinger ET, Freiha SF, et al. Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: a different view. J Urol 1995; 154: 145–149.
Walsh PC, Epstein JI, Lowe FC . Potency following radical prostatectomy with wide unilateral excision of the neurovascular bundle. J Urol 1987; 138: 823–827.
Quinlan DM, Epstein JI, Carter BS, et al. Sexual function following radical prostatectomy: influence of preservation of neurovascular bundles. J Urol 1991; 145: 998–1002.
Talcott JA, Rieker P, Propert KJ, et al. Patient-reported impotence and incontinence after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 89: 1117–1123.
Walsh PC, Marschke P, Picker D, et al. Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2000; 55: 58–61.
Aboseif S, Shinohara K, Breza J, et al. Role of penile vascular injury in erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy. Br J Urol 1994; 73: 75–82.
Bahnson RR, Catalona WJ . Papaverine testing of impotent patients following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol 1988; 139: 773–774.
Droupy S, Hessel A, Benoit G, et al. Assessement of the functional role of accessory pudendal arteries in erection by transrectal color doppler ultrasound. J Urol 1999; 162: 1987–1991.
Polascik TJ, Walsh PC . Radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of accessory pudendal arteries on the recovery of sexual function. J Urol 1995; 153: 150–152.
Montorsi F, Guazzoni G, Strambi LF, et al. Recovery of spontaneous erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy with and without early intracavernous injection of alprostadil: results of a prospective, randomized trial. J Urol 1997; 158: 1408–1410.
Zippe CD, Kedia AW, Kedia K, et al. treatment of erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy with sildenafil citrate (Viagra). Urology 1998; 52: 953–966.
Lowentritt BH, Scardino PT, Miles BJ, et al. Sildenafil citrate after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 1999; 162: 1614–1617.
Drew JB, Begun FP, Jacobs SC . Doppler-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Urology 1999; 33 (3): 228–229.
Rehman J, Christ GJ, Kaynan A, et al. Intraoperative electrical stimulation of cavernosal nerves with monitoring of intracorporeal pressure in patients undergoing nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. Br J Urol Int 1999; 84: 305–310.
Walsh PC, Marschke P, Catalona WJ, et al. Efficacy of first generation cavermap to verify location and function of cavernous nerves during radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional evaluation by experienced surgeons. Urology 2000; 57 (3): 491–494.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van der Aa, F., Joniau, S., De Ridder, D. et al. Potency after unilateral nerve sparing surgery: a report on functional and oncological results of unilateral nerve sparing surgery. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 6, 61–65 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500626
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500626
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Long-term functional and oncological results after retroperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy according to a prospective evaluation of 550 patients
World Journal of Urology (2006)
-
Nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy: techniques and clinical considerations
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (2005)