Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Potency after unilateral nerve sparing surgery: a report on functional and oncological results of unilateral nerve sparing surgery

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate unilateral nerve sparing prostate surgery. Patient files of men who underwent unilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy were analyzed retrospectively after a minimum follow-up period of 18 months. Of 46 patients who received unilateral nerve sparing surgery, 14 (30.4%) regained full potency after surgery. In 92.9% of these patients, recovery occurred within a period of 18 months. Age is the single most important factor in the recuperation of potency after unilateral nerve sparing surgery. Most of the patients (84.8%) reported the ability to achieve orgasm. Of eight patients with positive section margins, two had positive section margins at the spared side only. Unilateral nerve sparing surgery remains a feasible treatment option for prostate cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walsh PC, Donker PJ . Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 1982; 128: 492–497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Noldus J, Graefen M, Hammerer P, et al. Entwicklung der Tumorselektion anhand des pathologischen Stadiums beim klinisch lokalisierten Prostatakarzinom. Urologe A 1998; 37 (2): 195–198.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Walsh PC, Partin AW, Epstein JI . Cancer control and quality of life following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: results at 10 years. J Urol 1994; 152: 1831–1836.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Catalona WJ, Basler JW . Potency, continence and complication rates en 1870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 1999; 162: 433–438.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Geary ES, Dendinger ET, Freiha SF, et al. Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: a different view. J Urol 1995; 154: 145–149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Walsh PC, Epstein JI, Lowe FC . Potency following radical prostatectomy with wide unilateral excision of the neurovascular bundle. J Urol 1987; 138: 823–827.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Quinlan DM, Epstein JI, Carter BS, et al. Sexual function following radical prostatectomy: influence of preservation of neurovascular bundles. J Urol 1991; 145: 998–1002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Talcott JA, Rieker P, Propert KJ, et al. Patient-reported impotence and incontinence after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 89: 1117–1123.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Walsh PC, Marschke P, Picker D, et al. Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2000; 55: 58–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Aboseif S, Shinohara K, Breza J, et al. Role of penile vascular injury in erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy. Br J Urol 1994; 73: 75–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bahnson RR, Catalona WJ . Papaverine testing of impotent patients following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol 1988; 139: 773–774.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Droupy S, Hessel A, Benoit G, et al. Assessement of the functional role of accessory pudendal arteries in erection by transrectal color doppler ultrasound. J Urol 1999; 162: 1987–1991.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Polascik TJ, Walsh PC . Radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of accessory pudendal arteries on the recovery of sexual function. J Urol 1995; 153: 150–152.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Montorsi F, Guazzoni G, Strambi LF, et al. Recovery of spontaneous erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy with and without early intracavernous injection of alprostadil: results of a prospective, randomized trial. J Urol 1997; 158: 1408–1410.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zippe CD, Kedia AW, Kedia K, et al. treatment of erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy with sildenafil citrate (Viagra). Urology 1998; 52: 953–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lowentritt BH, Scardino PT, Miles BJ, et al. Sildenafil citrate after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 1999; 162: 1614–1617.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Drew JB, Begun FP, Jacobs SC . Doppler-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Urology 1999; 33 (3): 228–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rehman J, Christ GJ, Kaynan A, et al. Intraoperative electrical stimulation of cavernosal nerves with monitoring of intracorporeal pressure in patients undergoing nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. Br J Urol Int 1999; 84: 305–310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Walsh PC, Marschke P, Catalona WJ, et al. Efficacy of first generation cavermap to verify location and function of cavernous nerves during radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional evaluation by experienced surgeons. Urology 2000; 57 (3): 491–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H Van Poppel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van der Aa, F., Joniau, S., De Ridder, D. et al. Potency after unilateral nerve sparing surgery: a report on functional and oncological results of unilateral nerve sparing surgery. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 6, 61–65 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500626

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500626

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links