Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Male factor infertility

A solitary semen analysis can never predict normal fertility

Nature Reviews Urology volume 8, pages 16–17 (2011)Cite this article

Subjects

The fact that semen analysis cannot predict fertility has long been a source of frustration for both patients and physicians. Studies have demonstrated that semen analyses have poor predictive value for fertility status. Thus, the WHO reference values for human semen characteristics are of particular interest to anyone attempting to conceive and to the professionals who must counsel these individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Cooper, T. G. et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum. Reprod. Update 16, 231–235 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wilcox, A. J., Dunson, D. & Baird, D. B. The timing of the “fertile window” in the menstrual cycle: day specific estimates from a prospective study. BMJ 321, 1259–1262 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilcox, A. J. et al. On the frequency of intercourse around ovulation: evidence for biological influences. Hum. Reprod. 19, 1539–1543 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Coppola, M. et al. SpermCheck Fertility, an immunodiagnostic home test that detects normozoospermia and severe oligozoospermia. Hum. Reprod. 25, 853–861 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Klotz, K. L. et al. Clinical and consumer trial performance of a sensitive immunodiagnostic home test that qualitatively detects low concentrations of sperm following vasectomy. J. Urol. 180, 2569–2576 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Haldar, N. et al. How reliable is a vasectomy? Long-term follow-up of vasectomised men. Lancet 356, 43–44 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Small, D. J. et al. Interpretation of semen analysis among infertile couples. CMAJ 136, 829–833 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Larry I. Lipshultz and Arielle R. Nagler for editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Beth Israel Medical Center, 10 Union Square East, Suite 3A, New York, 10003, NY, USA

    Harris M. Nagler

Authors
  1. Harris M. Nagler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nagler, H. A solitary semen analysis can never predict normal fertility. Nat Rev Urol 8, 16–17 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2010.226

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2010.226

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing