Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Opinion
  • Published:

Excessive trust in authorities and its influence on experimental design

Abstract

Most graduate curricula in biological sciences offer courses that cover various scientific disciplines, but they give relatively little formal instruction in experimental design. Students learn the latter primarily through hands-on experience in the laboratory, and some find this learning process bewildering and frustrating. So, what is the root of the problem, and how can young researchers get experiments to work more predictably and reproducibly?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The importance of planning in experimental design.
Figure 2: The flowchart of an experimental protocol.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kuhn, T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (ed. Neurath, O.) (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wilson, E. B. An Introduction to Scientific Research (McGraw–Hill, New York, 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Medawar, P. B. Advice to a Young Scientist (Basic Books, New York, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grinnell, F. The Scientific Attitude (Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barker, K. At the Bench: A Laboratory Navigator (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ramón y Cajal, S. Advice for a Young Investigator (MIT Press, Boston, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Phillips, E. M. & Pugh, D. S. How to Get a PhD: A Handbook for Students and Their Mentors (Open University Press, Buckingham, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank S. Miller (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland), R. Behringer (The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas), F. Watt (London Research Institute, ICRF) and many of my colleagues and students at New York University (NYU) Medical School for critically reading the manuscript. This article is based on the Borden Lecture that I delivered during the 2003 Joint Annual Meeting of the British Societies of Cell Biology and Developmental Biology. The lecture is also a part of a graduate course that I teach, entitled 'Scientific methods: survival skills for young biomedical researchers', which covers experimental design (discussed in this article), critical analysis of scientific literature, scientific writing, oral presentation and scientific integrity. The course has been a requirement for all first-year graduate students of the Sackler Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences at NYU Medical School since 2001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Related links

Related links

FURTHER INFORMATION

Tung-Tien Sun's laboratory

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sun, TT. Excessive trust in authorities and its influence on experimental design. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5, 577–581 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1429

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1429

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing