Key Points
-
Mathematical models can be useful to developmental biologists, in particular in helping to bridge the gap in understanding between proposed molecular interactions inside and between cells and their tissue-level effects.
-
Differential equation models have been the most popular in development, and there is a growing body of work in the application of more computationally efficient models, such as hybrid systems and discrete state systems. Both 'top-down' and 'bottom-up' model architectures have been used.
-
By focusing on a few developmental systems and the corresponding models that have been developed, this Review illustrates the potential and possibilities in developing an intuition about interactions among biochemical components and their emergent properties.
-
The first mathematical model we discuss represents the segment polarity network in the early Drosophila melanogaster embryo. Modifications to the proposed network of molecular interactions resulting from this model are presented, along with ensuing, simpler models that aid in understanding this system.
-
How diffusion models have helped in forming hypotheses about the properties of a morphogen in different species of embryos that show great variation in size is then discussed.
-
The Review concludes with two sets of mathematical models highlighting cell-to-cell communication in Dictyostelium discoideum and Myxococcus xanthus, describing how these models have helped in postulating molecular mechanisms responsible for cell signalling and aggregation when nutrients are scarce.
Abstract
In recent years, mathematical modelling of developmental processes has earned new respect. Not only have mathematical models been used to validate hypotheses made from experimental data, but designing and testing these models has led to testable experimental predictions. There are now impressive cases in which mathematical models have provided fresh insight into biological systems, by suggesting, for example, how connections between local interactions among system components relate to their wider biological effects. By examining three developmental processes and corresponding mathematical models, this Review addresses the potential of mathematical modelling to help understand development.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Turing, A. M. The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 237, 37–72 (1952).
Ideker, T., Galitski, T. & Hood, L. A new approach to decoding life: systems biology. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 2, 343–372 (2001).
de Jong, H. Modeling and simulation of genetic regulatory systems: a literature review. J. Comput. Biol. 9, 67–103 (2002).
Mogilner, A., Wollman, R. & Marshall, W. F. Quantitative modeling in cell biology: what is it good for? Dev. Cell 11, 279–287 (2006).
Noble, D. The future: putting Humpty-Dumpty together again. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 31, 156–158 (2003).
Asthagiri, A. R. & Lauffenburger, D. A. Bioengineering models of cell signaling. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2, 31–53 (2000).
von Dassow, G., Meir, E., Munro, E. M. & Odell, G. M. The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module. Nature 406, 188–192 (2000). This paper describes how a computational model led the authors to modify their understanding of how the segment polarity gene network works.
Keranen, S. V. et al. Three-dimensional morphology and gene expression in the Drosophila blastoderm at cellular resolution II: dynamics. Genome Biol. 7, R124 (2006).
Albert, R. & Othmer, H. G. The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Theor. Biol. 223, 1–18 (2003).
Von Dassow, G. & Odell, G. M. Design and constraints of the Drosophila segment polarity module: robust spatial patterning emerges from intertwined cell state switches. J. Exp. Zool. 294, 179–215 (2002).
Ingolia, N. T. Topology and robustness in the Drosophila segment polarity network. PLoS Biol. 2, e123 (2004).
Bagowski, C. P. & Ferrell, J. E. Jr. Bistability in the JNK cascade. Curr. Biol. 11, 1176–1182 (2001).
Angeli, D., Ferrell, J. E. Jr & Sontag, E. D. Detection of multistability, bifurcations, and hysteresis in a large class of biological positive-feedback systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 1822–1827 (2004).
Pomerening, J. R., Kim, S. Y. & Ferrell, J. E. Jr. Systems-level dissection of the cell-cycle oscillator: bypassing positive feedback produces damped oscillations. Cell 122, 565–578 (2005).
Yi, T. M., Huang, Y., Simon, M. I. & Doyle, J. Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4649–4653 (2000).
Eldar, A. et al. Robustness of the BMP morphogen gradient in Drosophila embryonic patterning. Nature 419, 304–308 (2002).
Bolouri, H. & Davidson, E. H. Transcriptional regulatory cascades in development: initial rates, not steady state, determine network kinetics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9371–9376 (2003).
Tegner, J., Yeung, M. K., Hasty, J. & Collins, J. J. Reverse engineering gene networks: integrating genetic perturbations with dynamical modeling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 5944–5949 (2003).
Ozbudak, E. M., Thattai, M., Lim, H. N., Shraiman, B. I. & Van Oudenaarden, A. Multistability in the lactose utilization network of Escherichia coli. Nature 427, 737–740 (2004).
Garcia-Ojalvo, J., Elowitz, M. B. & Strogatz, S. H. Modeling a synthetic multicellular clock: repressilators coupled by quorum sensing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 10955–10960 (2004).
El-Samad, H., Kurata, H., Doyle, J. C., Gross, C. A. & Khammash, M. Surviving heat shock: control strategies for robustness and performance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 2736–2741 (2005).
Shimmi, O., Umulis, D., Othmer, H. & O'Connor, M. B. Facilitated transport of a DPP/SCW heterodimer by SOG/TSG leads to robust patterning of the Drosophila blastoderm embryo. Cell 120, 873–886 (2005).
Gregor, T., Bialek, W., de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. R., Tank, D. W. & Wieschaus, E. F. Diffusion and scaling during early embryonic pattern formation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 18403–18407 (2005). The authors use a mathematical model of diffusion to investigate whether diffusion is a plausible mechanism for molecular motion in the early D. melanogaster embryo. The question of how identical, but scaled, patterns form across embryos with large differences in size is also investigated.
Houchmandzadeh, B., Wieschaus, E. & Leibler, S. Establishment of developmental precision and proportions in the early Drosophila embryo. Nature 415, 798–802 (2002).
Odell, G. M. & Bonner, J. How the Dictyostelium discoideum grex crawls. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 312, 487–525 (1986).
Firtel, R. A. & Meili, R. Dictyostelium: a model for regulated cell movement during morphogenesis. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10, 421–427 (2000).
Tomchik, K. J. & Devreotes, P. N. Adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate waves in Dictyostelium discoideum: a demonstration by isotope dilution–fluorography. Science 212, 443–446 (1981).
Martiel, J. L. & Goldbeter, A. Autonomous chaotic behaviour of the slime mould Dictyostelium discoideum predicted by a model for cyclic AMP signalling. Nature 313, 590–592 (1985).
Tyson, J. J. & Murray, J. D. Cyclic AMP waves during aggregation of Dictyostelium amoebae. Development 106, 421–426 (1989).
Devreotes, P. N. G protein-linked signaling pathways control the developmental program of Dictyostelium. Neuron 12, 235–241 (1994).
Levine, H., Aranson, I., Tsimring, L. & Truong, T. V. Positive genetic feedback governs cAMP spiral wave formation in Dictyostelium. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 6382–6386 (1996). A mathematical model is constructed to help investigate the link between individual cell motion and the spatial concentration of the secreted component cAMP.
Alcantara, F. & Monk, M. Signal propagation during aggregation in the slime mould Dictyostelium discoideum. J. Gen. Microbiol. 85, 321–334 (1974).
Devreotes, P. N., Potel, M. J. & MacKay, S. A. Quantitative analysis of cyclic AMP waves mediating aggregation in Dictyostelium discoideum. Dev. Biol. 96, 405–415 (1983).
Vaughan, R. A. & Devreotes, P. N. Ligand-induced phosphorylation of the cAMP receptor from Dictyostelium discoideum. J. Biol. Chem. 263, 14538–14543 (1988).
Lee, K. J., Goldstein, R. E. & Cox, E. C. cAMP waves in Dictyostelium territories. Nonlinearity 15, C1–C5 (2002).
Tang, Y. & Othmer, H. G. A G protein-based model of adaptation in Dictyostelium discoideum. Math. Biosci. 120, 25–76 (1994).
Sawai, S., Thomason, P. A. & Cox, E. C. An autoregulatory circuit for long-range self-organization in Dictyostelium cell populations. Nature 433, 323–326 (2005). The authors use experimental results to refine earlier models of D. discoideum cell aggregation, and thereby elucidate the mechanism by which cAMP concentration is used to control cell motion.
Igoshin, O. A., Goldbeter, A., Kaiser, D. & Oster, G. A biochemical oscillator explains several aspects of Myxococcus xanthus behavior during development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 15760–15765 (2004). A mathematical model is designed to help explain the oscillatory behaviour and spatial wave formation of M. xanthus cells, inspiring a new biochemical understanding of this system.
Igoshin, O. A., Mogilner, A., Welch, R. D., Kaiser, D. & Oster, G. Pattern formation and traveling waves in myxobacteria: theory and modeling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 14913–14918 (2001).
Igoshin, O. A., Neu, J. & Oster, G. Developmental waves in myxobacteria: a distinctive pattern formation mechanism. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 70, 041911 (2004).
Igoshin, O. A., Welch, R., Kaiser, D. & Oster, G. Waves and aggregation patterns in myxobacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 4256–4261 (2004).
Kaiser, D. Coupling cell movement to multicellular development in myxobacteria. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 1, 45–54 (2003).
Kim, S. K. & Kaiser, D. Cell alignment required in differentiation of Myxococcus xanthus. Science 249, 926–928 (1990).
Sager, B. & Kaiser, D. Intercellular C-signaling and the traveling waves of Myxococcus. Genes Dev. 8, 2793–2804 (1994).
Welch, R. & Kaiser, D. Cell behavior in traveling wave patterns of myxobacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 14907–14912 (2001).
Goldbeter, A. Biochemical Oscillations and Cellular Rhythms: The Molecular Bases of Periodic and Chaotic Behavior (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1996).
Meinhardt, H. Models of Biological Pattern Formation (Academic, London, 1982).
Meinhardt, H. From observations to paradigms; the importance of theories and models. An interview with Hans Meinhardt by Richard Gordon and Lev Beloussov. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 50, 103–111 (2006).
Janes, K. A. et al. A systems model of signaling identifies a molecular basis set for cytokine-induced apoptosis. Science 310, 1646–1653 (2005).
Janes, K. A. et al. The response of human epithelial cells to TNF involves an inducible autocrine cascade. Cell 124, 1225–1239 (2006).
Winfree, A. T. Spiral waves of chemical activity. Science 175, 634–636 (1972).
Gierer, A. & Meinhardt, H. A theory of biological pattern formation. Kybernetik 12, 30–39 (1972).
Savageau, M. A. Allometric morphogenesis of complex systems: derivation of the basic equations from first principles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 76, 6023–6025 (1979).
Savageau, M. A. Growth of complex systems can be related to the properties of their underlying determinants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 76, 5413–5417 (1979).
Erban, R. & Othmer, H. From signal transduction to spatial pattern formation in E. coli: a paradigm for multiscale modeling in biology. Multiscale Model. Simul. 3, 362–394 (2005).
Suel, G. M., Garcia-Ojalvo, J., Liberman, L. M. & Elowitz, M. B. An excitable gene regulatory circuit induces transient cellular differentiation. Nature 440, 545–550 (2006).
Reeves, G. T., Kalifa, R., Klein, D. E., Lemmon, M. A. & Shvartsman, S. Y. Computational analysis of EGFR inhibition by Argos. Dev. Biol. 284, 523–535 (2005).
Dillon, R., Gadgil, C. & Othmer, H. G. Short- and long-range effects of Sonic hedgehog in limb development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 10152–10157 (2003).
Giurumescu, C. A., Sternberg, P. W. & Asthagiri, A. R. Intercellular coupling amplifies fate segregation during Caenorhabditis elegans vulval development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 1331–1336 (2006). The authors study the relationship between developmental patterning and the underlying mathematical model, and answer interesting questions about the effect of parameter changes on the kinds of pattern that can be achieved.
Kholodenko, B. N. Negative feedback and ultrasensitivity can bring about oscillations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades. Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 1583–1588 (2000).
Guido, N. J. et al. A bottom-up approach to gene regulation. Nature 439, 856–860 (2006).
Bhalla, U. S. & Iyengar, R. Emergent properties of networks of biological signaling pathways. Science 283, 381–387 (1999).
Mjolsness, E., Sharp, D. H. & Reinitz, J. A connectionist model of development. J. Theor. Biol. 152, 429–453 (1991).
Hartwell, L. H., Hopfield, J. J., Leibler, S. & Murray, A. W. From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature 402, C47–C52 (1999).
Milo, R. et al. Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science 298, 824–827 (2002).
Benner, S. A. & Sismour, A. M. Synthetic biology. Nature Rev. Genet. 6, 533–543 (2005).
Endy, D. Foundations for engineering biology. Nature 438, 449–453 (2005).
Elowitz, M. B. & Leibler, S. A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature 403, 335–338 (2000).
McDaniel, R. & Weiss, R. Advances in synthetic biology: on the path from prototypes to applications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 16, 476–483 (2005).
Anderson, J. C., Clarke, E. J., Arkin, A. P. & Voigt, C. A. Environmentally controlled invasion of cancer cells by engineered bacteria. J. Mol. Biol. 355, 619–627 (2006).
Bray, D. Molecular networks: the top-down view. Science 301, 1864–1865 (2003).
Kholodenko, B. N. et al. Untangling the wires: a strategy to trace functional interactions in signaling and gene networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 12841–12846 (2002).
Shen-Orr, S. S., Milo, R., Mangan, S. & Alon, U. Network motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia coli. Nature Genet. 31, 64–68 (2002).
Amonlirdviman, K. et al. Mathematical modeling of planar cell polarity to understand domineering nonautonomy. Science 307, 423–426 (2005).
Huang, S. Gene expression profiling, genetic networks, and cellular states: an integrating concept for tumorigenesis and drug discovery. J. Mol. Med. 77, 469–480 (1999).
Kauffman, S. A. Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. J. Theor. Biol. 22, 437–467 (1969).
Friedman, N., Linial, M., Nachman, I. & Pe'er, D. Using Bayesian networks to analyze expression data. J. Comput. Biol. 7, 601–620 (2000).
Ghosh, R. & Tomlin, C. Lateral inhibition through Delta-Notch signaling: a piecewise affine hybrid model. Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes Comp. Sci. 2034, 232–246 (2001).
Lincoln, P. & Tiwari, A. Symbolic systems biology: Hybrid modeling and analysis of biological networks. Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes Comp. Sci. 2993, 660–672 (2004).
Editors. Can biological phenomena be understood by humans? Nature 403, 345 (2000).
Lee, K. J., Goldstein, R. E. & Cox, E. C. Resetting wave forms in Dictyostelium territories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 068101 (2001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Related links
Glossary
- Phyllotaxis
-
The radial organization of the leaves on the shoot of a plant; the basic patterns are spiral, alternating sides, opposite each other and whorled.
- Systems biology
-
There is no single accepted definition for this idea. We define it as the attempt, using mathematical modelling, to examine the structure of a biological pathway or function, and to simultaneously consider all of the relevant component parts and the dynamics of their interactions.
- Morphogen
-
A diffusible protein that forms a concentration gradient to control patterning by inducing at least two distinct threshold dependent responses.
- Influence model
-
A descriptive, non-mathematical model that represents positive (promoting) or negative (inhibitory) influences between components using arrows.
- Ordinary differential equation
-
An equation that contains functions of only one independent variable, and one or more of these functions' derivatives with respect to that variable.
- Synthetic biology
-
The field at the interface of engineering and biology, involving designing and building systems from biological components.
- Boolean model
-
A collection of nodes, each representing a system state, with a set of rules that represent how the system switches between states.
- Steady-state pattern
-
In a tissue-patterning system, this refers to a pattern that is usually reached after some time, and persists indefinitely or until a new tissue-patterning system takes over.
- Bayesian network
-
A collection of nodes connected by edges, in which each node represents a system state and each edge represents an influence or dependency between the two nodes that touch it.
- Control theory
-
A theory built around the behaviour of dynamic systems, in which a controller is designed to automatically manipulate system input variables in order to guide the system output variables to desired values.
- Numerical solution
-
A solution that is represented as a set of numerical values, which are usually obtained using a computer when an analytic solution is difficult or impossible to obtain.
- Partial differential equation
-
An equation that contains functions of many independent variables, and one or more of these functions' partial derivatives with respect to that variable.
- Chemotaxis
-
The movement of cells or organisms in response to chemical stimulation.
- Analytic solution
-
A functional, rather than numerical, representation of a solution.
- Flux
-
The amount of flow per unit time, arising, for example, from diffusion or convection.
- Principal component analysis
-
A method to organize similar data points together in groups, so that an overall data set becomes simpler to analyse.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tomlin, C., Axelrod, J. Biology by numbers: mathematical modelling in developmental biology. Nat Rev Genet 8, 331–340 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2098
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2098
This article is cited by
-
Empirical methods for the validation of time-to-event mathematical models taking into account uncertainty and variability: application to EGFR + lung adenocarcinoma
BMC Bioinformatics (2023)
-
A group theoretic approach to model comparison with simplicial representations
Journal of Mathematical Biology (2022)
-
Theorists and experimentalists must join forces
Nature Computational Science (2021)
-
A Stochastic Model of DNA Double-Strand Breaks Repair Throughout the Cell Cycle
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology (2020)
-
Massive computational acceleration by using neural networks to emulate mechanism-based biological models
Nature Communications (2019)