Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Molecular mechanisms of flower development: an armchair guide

Key Points

  • Floral-meristem identity genes promote flower development by repressing genes that promote an inflorescence fate and activate floral-organ identity genes.

  • The updated ABCE model of floral-organ identity states that SEPALLATA (E class) genes function with different combinations of the A, B and C class floral-organ identity genes to specify sepal, petal, stamen and carpel identity.

  • Most of the ABCE class floral-organ identity genes encode MADS domain proteins, which form multimeric transcriptional regulatory complexes.

  • Regulation of floral-organ identity gene expression is complex and occurs at multiple levels including post-translational regulation by microRNAs.

  • New approaches have begun to reveal downstream targets of floral-organ identity genes, but the complex regulatory cascades that control floral organogenesis are not well understood.

  • Molecular genetic studies are starting to reveal the mechanisms that are behind other aspects of flower development, such as the regulation of organ size and the generation of floral symmetry.

  • Regulation of floral-organ identity seems to occur through similar mechanisms in eudicots and monocots.

Abstract

An afternoon stroll through an English garden reveals the breathtaking beauty and enormous diversity of flowering plants. The extreme variation of flower morphologies, combined with the relative simplicity of floral structures and the wealth of floral mutants available, has made the flower an excellent model for studying developmental cell-fate specification, morphogenesis and tissue patterning. Recent molecular genetic studies have begun to reveal the transcriptional regulatory cascades that control early patterning events during flower formation, the dynamics of the gene-regulatory interactions, and the complex combinatorial mechanisms that create a distinct final floral architecture and form.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The ABCE model for floral-organ patterning.
Figure 2: The quartet model for potential formation of MADS domain protein-regulatory complexes.
Figure 3: mRNA expression patterns of the Arabidopsis thaliana floral-organ identity genes during two stages of flower development.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ng, M. & Yanofsky, M. F. Three ways to learn the ABCs. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 3, 47–52 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lohmann, J. U. & Weigel, D. Building beauty: the genetic control of floral patterning. Dev. Cell 2, 135–142 (2002). This review presents an in-depth examination of the floral-organ identity genes and their regulation.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Theissen, G. Development of floral organ identity: stories from the MADS house. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4, 75–85 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Steeves, T. A. & Sussex, I. M. Patterns in Plant Development (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1989).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Jurgens, G. Apical–basal pattern formation in Arabidopsis embryogenesis. EMBO J. 20, 3609–3616 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Fletcher, J. C. Shoot and floral meristem maintenance in Arabidopsis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 53, 45–66 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Simpson, G. G. & Dean, C. Arabidopsis, the Rosetta stone of flowering time. Science 296, 285–289 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Coen, E. S. et al. floricaula: a homeotic gene required for flower development in Antirrhinum majus. Cell 63, 1311–1322 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mandel, M. A. & Yanofsky, M. F. A gene triggering flower formation in Arabidopsis. Nature 377, 522–524 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Weigel, D., Alvarez, J., Smyth, D. R., Yanofsky, M. F. & Meyerowitz, E. M. LEAFY controls floral meristem identity in Arabidopsis. Cell 69, 843–859 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Weigel, D. & Nilsson, O. A developmental switch sufficient for flower initiation in diverse plants. Nature 377, 495–500 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Huijser, P. et al. Bracteomania, an inflorescence anomaly, is caused by the loss of function of the MADS-box gene squamosa in Antirrhinum majus. EMBO J. 11, 1239–1249 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Parcy, F., Nilsson, O., Busch, M. A., Lee, I. & Weigel, D. A genetic framework for floral patterning. Nature 395, 561–566 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Riechmann, J. L., Krizek, B. A. & Meyerowitz, E. M. Dimerization specificity of Arabidopsis MADS domain homeotic proteins APETALA1, APETALA3, PISTILLATA, and AGAMOUS. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 4793–4798 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Liljegren, S. J., Gustafson-Brown, C., Pinyopich, A., Ditta, G. S. & Yanofsky, M. F. Interactions among APETALA1, LEAFY and TERMINAL FLOWER1 specify meristem fate. Plant Cell 11, 1007–1018 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wagner, D., Sablowski, R. W. M. & Meyerowitz, E. M. Transcriptional activation of APETALA1 by LEAFY. Science 285, 582–584 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. William, D. A. et al. Genomic identification of direct targets of LEAFY. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 1775–1780 (2004). This paper describes the use of microarray analysis to identify putative LEAFY primary target genes followed by chromatin immunoprecipitation to confirm the binding of the LEAFY protein to the target-gene promoters.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ratcliffe, O. J., Bradley, D. J. & Coen, E. S. Separation of shoot and floral identity in Arabidopsis. Development 126, 1109–1120 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu, H., Ito, T., Wellmer, F. & Meyerowitz, E. M. Repression of AGAMOUS-LIKE 24 is a crucial step in promoting flower development. Nature Genet. 36, 157–161 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hanzawa, Y., Money, T. & Bradley, D. A single amino acid converts a repressor to an activator of flowering. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 7748–7753 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmid, M. et al. Dissection of floral induction pathways using global expression analysis. Development 130, 6001–6012 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wagner, D. et al. Floral induction in tissue culture: a system for the analysis of LEAFY-dependent gene regulation. Plant J. 39, 273–282 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Coen, E. S. & Meyerowitz, E. M. The war of the whorls — genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353, 31–37 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Keck, E., McSteen, P., Carpenter, R. & Coen, E. Separation of genetic functions controlling organ identity in flowers. EMBO J. 22, 1058–1066 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kanno, A., Saeki, H., Kameya, T., Saedler, H. & Theissen, G. Heterotropic expression of class B floral homeotic genes supports a modified ABC model for tulip (Tulipa gesneriana). Plant Mol. Biol. 52, 831–841 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Angenent, G. C., Busscher, M., Franken, J., Mol, J. N. M. & van Tunen, A. J. Differential expression of two MADS box genes in wild-type and mutant Petunia flowers. Plant Cell 4, 983–993 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Webster, M. A. & Gilmartin, P. M. A comparison of early floral ontogeny in wild-type and floral homeotic mutant phenotypes of Primula. Planta 216, 903–917 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nagasawa, N. et al. SUPERWOMAN and DROOPING LEAF genes control floral organ identity in rice. Development 130, 705–718 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Whipple, C. J. et al. Conservation of B-class floral homeotic gene function between maize and Arabidopsis. Development 131, 6083–6091 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ditta, G., Pinyopich, A., Robles, P., Pelaz, S. & Yanofsky, M. F. The SEP4 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana functions in floral organ and meristem identity. Curr. Biol. 14, 1935–1940 (2004). This study identifies a fourth SEP gene, which has an important role for specification of floral-meristem identity, and showed that SEP genes are required for specification of all floral-organ identities.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bowman, J. L., Smyth, D. R. & Meyerowitz, E. M. Genetic interactions among floral homeotic genes of Arabidopsis. Development 112, 1–20 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Vandenbussche, M. et al. Toward the analysis of the petunia MADS box gene family by reverse and forward transposon mutagenesis approaches: B, C and D floral organ identity functions require SEPALLATA-like MADS box genes in petunia. Plant Cell 15, 2686–2693 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ferrario, S., Immink, R. G. H., Shchennikova, A., Busscher-Lange, J. & Angenent, G. C. The MADS box gene FBP2 is required for SEPALLATA function in petunia. Plant Cell 15, 914–925 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Colombo, L. et al. The petunia MADS box gene FBP11 determines ovule identity. Plant Cell 7, 1859–1868 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Pinyopich, A. et al. Assessing the redundancy of MADS-box genes during carpel and ovule development. Nature 424, 85–88 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Favaro, R. et al. MADS-box protein complexes control carpel and ovule development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 15, 2603–2611 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Parenicova, L. et al. Molecular and phylogenetic analyses of the complete MADS-box transcription factor family in Arabidopsis: new openings to the MADS world. Plant Cell 15, 1538–1551 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Honma, T. & Goto, K. Complexes of MADS-box proteins are sufficient to convert leaves into floral organs. Nature 409, 525–529 (2001). This paper describes the association of MADS domain proteins into multimeric complexes (A + B + E and B + C + E). Ectopic expression of the class A, B, C and E floral-organ identity genes was shown to be sufficient to convert leaves into reproductive organs.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pelaz, S., Tapia-Lopez, R., Alvarez-Buylla, E. R. & Yanofsky, M. F. Conversion of leaves into petals in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 11, 182–184 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Honma, T. & Goto, K. The Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene PISTILLATA is regulated by discrete cis-elements responsive to induction and maintenance signals. Development 127, 2021–2030 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Egea-Cortines, M., Saedler, H. & Sommer, H. Ternary complex formation between the MADS-box proteins SQUAMOSA, DEFICIENS and GLOBOSA is involved in the control of floral architecture in Antirrhinum majus. EMBO J. 18, 5370–5379 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Pelaz, S., Ditta, G. S., Baumann, E., Wisman, E. & Yanofsky, M. F. B and C floral organ identity functions require SEPALLATA MADS-box genes. Nature 405, 200–203 (2000). This paper defines a new organ-identity function. The SEPALLATA genes ( SEP1, SEP2, SEP3 ) function with the class A, B and C floral-organ identity genes to specify petal, stamen and carpel identity.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Immink, R. G. H. et al. Analysis of the petunia MADS box transcription factor family. Mol. Genet. Genomics 268, 598–606 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Fan, H. -Y., Hu, Y., Tudor, M. & Ma, H. Specific interactions between the K domains of AG and the AGLs, members of the MADS domain family of DNA binding proteins. Plant J. 11, 999–1010 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Pelaz, S., Gustafson-Brown, C., Kohalmi, S. E., Crosby, W. L. & Yanofsky, M. F. APETALA1 and SEPALLATA3 interact to promote flower development. Plant J. 26, 385–394 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. de Folter, S. et al. Comprehensive interaction map of the Arabidopsis MADS box transcription factors. Plant Cell 17, 1424–1433 (2005). A comprehensive analysis of interactions between MADS domain proteins. Because of the observed interactions between some MADS domain proteins that specify floral-organ fate with those that regulate floral induction, the authors propose a model in which such mixed complexes function in negative-feedback loops to control switches in meristem identity.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Ng, M. & Yanofsky, M. F. Activation of the Arabidopsis B class homeotic genes by APETALA1. Plant Cell 13, 739–753 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Lenhard, M., Bohnert, A., Jurgens, G. & Laux, T. Termination of stem cell maintenance in Arabidopsis floral meristems by interactions between WUSCHEL and AGAMOUS. Cell 105, 805–814 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lohmann, J. U. et al. A molecular link between stem cell regulation and floral patterning in Arabidopsis. Cell 105, 793–803 (2001). This paper, together with reference 48, shows that termination of meristem identity in the centre of a flower is due to downregulation of the stem cell specifier WUSCHEL by the floral-organ identity gene AGAMOUS.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Alvarez-Venegas, R. et al. ATX-1, an Arabidopsis homolog of trithorax, activates flower homeotic genes. Curr. Biol. 13, 627–637 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Yu, H. et al. Floral homeotic genes are targets of gibberellin signaling in flower development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 7827–7832 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Gustafson-Brown, C., Savidge, B. & Yanofsky, M. F. Regulation of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene APETALA1. Cell 76, 131–143 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Drews, G. N., Bowman, J. L. & Meyerowitz, E. M. Negative regulation of the Arabidopsis homeotic gene AGAMOUS by the APETALA2 product. Cell 65, 991–1001 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Aukerman, M. J. & Sakai, H. Regulation of flowering time and floral organ identity by a microRNA and its APETALA2-like target genes. Plant Cell 15, 2730–2741 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Chen, X. A microRNA as a translational repressor of APETALA2 in Arabidopsis flower development. Science 303, 2022–2025 (2004). This paper, together with reference 54, describes the role of an miRNA in regulating floral-organ identity gene expression.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Schwab, R. et al. Specific effects of microRNAs on the plant transcriptome. Dev. Cell 8, 517–527 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Sridhar, V. V., Surendrarao, A., Gonzalez, D., Conlan, R. S. & Liu, Z. Transcriptional repression of target genes by LEUNIG and SEUSS, two interacting regulatory proteins for Arabidopsis flower development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 11494–11499 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Navarro, C. et al. Molecular and genetic interactions between STYLOSA and GRAMINIFOLIA in the control of Antirrhinum vegetative and reproductive development. Development 131, 3649–3659 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Byzova, M. V. et al. Arabidopsis STERILE APETALA, a multifunctional gene regulating inflorescence, flower and ovule development. Genes Dev. 13, 1002–1014 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Krizek, B. A., Prost, V. & Macias, A. AINTEGUMENTA promotes petal identity and acts as a negative regulator of AGAMOUS. Plant Cell 12, 1357–1366 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Bao, X., Franks, R. G., Levin, J. Z. & Liu, Z. Repression of AGAMOUS by BELLRINGER in floral and inflorescence meristems. Plant Cell 16, 1478–1489 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Bowman, J. L. et al. SUPERMAN, a regulator of floral homeotic genes in Arabidopsis. Development 114, 599–615 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Schultz, E. A., Pickett, F. B. & Haughn, G. W. The FLO10 gene-product regulates the expression domain of homeotic genes AP3 and PI in Arabidopsis flowers. Plant Cell 3, 1221–1237 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Sakai, H., Medrano, L. J. & Meyerowitz, E. M. Role of SUPERMAN in maintaining Arabidopsis floral whorl boundaries. Nature 378, 199–203 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Chen, X. & Meyerowitz, E. M. HUA1 and HUA2 are two members of the floral homeotic AGAMOUS pathway. Mol. Cell 3, 349–360 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Cheng, Y. & Chen, X. Posttranscriptional control of plant development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 7, 20–25 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Cheng, Y., Kato, N., Wang, W., Li, J. & Chen, X. Two RNA binding proteins, HEN4 and HUA1, act in the processing of AGAMOUS pre-mRNA in Arabidopsis thaliana. Dev. Cell 4, 53–66 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Park, M. Y., Wu, G., Gonzalez-Sulser, A., Vaucheret, H. & Poethig, R. S. Nuclear processing and export of microRNAs in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 3691–3696 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Yu, B. et al. Methylation as a crucial step in plant microRNA biogenesis. Science 307, 932–935 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Schoof, H. et al. The stem cell population of Arabidopsis shoot meristems is maintained by a regulatory loop between the CLAVATA and WUSCHEL genes. Cell 100, 635–644 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Carles, C. C., Choffnes-Inada, D., Reville, K., Lertpiriyapong, K. & Fletcher, J. C. ULTRAPETALA1 encodes a putative SAND domain transcription factor that controls shoot and floral meristem activity in Arabidopsis. Development 132, 897–911 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Fletcher, J. C. The ULTRAPETALA gene controls shoot and floral meristem size in Arabidopsis. Development 128, 1323–1333 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Carles, C. C., Lertpiriyapong, K., Reville, K. & Fletcher, J. C. The ULTRAPETALA1 gene functions early in Arabidopsis development to restrict shoot apical meristem activity, and acts through WUSCHEL to regulate floral meristem determinacy. Genetics 167, 1893–1903 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Goodrich, J. et al. A Polycomb-group gene regulates homeotic gene expression in Arabidopsis. Nature 386, 44–51 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Hennig, L., Taranto, P., Walser, M., Schonrock, N. & Gruissem, W. Arabidopsis MSI1 is required for epigenetic maintenance of reproductive development. Development 130, 2555–2565 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Serrano-Cartegena, J. et al. Genetic analysis of incurvata mutants reveals three independent genetic operations at work in Arabidopsis leaf morphogenesis. Genetics 156, 1363–1377 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Chitvivattana, Y. et al. Interaction of Polycomb-group proteins controlling flowering in Arabidopsis. Development 131, 5263–5276 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Lund, A. H. & van Lohuizen, M. Polycomb complexes and silencing mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16, 239–246 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Sablowski, R. W. M. & Meyerowitz, E. M. A homologue of NO APICAL MERISTEM is an immediate target of the floral homeotic genes APETALA3/PISTILLATA. Cell 92, 93–103 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Sakai, H., Krizek, B. A., Jacobsen, S. E. & Meyerowitz, E. M. Regulation of SUP expression identifies multiple regulators involved in Arabidopsis floral meristem development. Plant Cell 12, 1607–1618 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Zik, M. & Irish, V. Global identification of target genes regulated by APETALA3 and PISTILLATA floral homeotic gene action. Plant Cell 15, 207–222 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Ito, T. et al. The homeotic protein AGAMOUS controls microsporogenesis by regulation of SPOROCYTELESS. Nature 430, 356–360 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Gomez-Mena, C., de Folter, S., Costa, M. M., Angenent, G. C. & Sablowski, R. Transcriptional program controlled by the floral homeotic gene AGAMOUS during early organogenesis. Development 132, 429–438 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Cheng, H. et al. Gibberellin regulates Arabidopsis floral development via suppression of DELLA protein function. Development 131, 1055–1064 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Wellmer, F., Riechmann, J. L., Alves-Ferreira, M. & Meyerowitz, E. M. Genome-wide analysis of spatial gene expression in Arabidopsis flowers. Plant Cell 16, 1314–1326 (2004). This paper describes a microarray approach that uses floral-homeotic mutants to identify genes that are expressed in an organ-specific manner.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Durfee, T. et al. The F-box-containing protein UFO and AGAMOUS participate in antagonistic pathways governing early petal development in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8571–8576 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Griffith, M. E., da Silva Conceicao, A. & Smyth, D. R. PETAL LOSS gene regulates initiation and orientation of second whorl organs in the Arabidopsis flower. Development 126, 5635–5644 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Takeda, S., Matsumoto, N. & Okada, K. RABBIT EARS, encoding a SUPERMAN-like zinc finger protein, regulates petal development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 131, 425–434 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Xing, S., Rosso, M. G. & Zachgo, S. ROXY1, a member of the plant glutaredoxin family, is required for petal development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 132, 1555–1565 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Brewer, P. B. et al. PETAL LOSS, a trihelix transcription factor gene, regulates perianth architecture in the Arabidopsis flower. Development 131, 4035–4045 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Aida, M., Ishida, T., Fukaki, H., Fujisawa, H. & Tasaka, M. Genes involved in organ separation in Arabidopsis: an analysis of the cup-shaped cotyledon mutant. Plant Cell 9, 841–857 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Souer, E., van Houwelingen, A., Kloos, D., Mol, J. & Koes, R. The NO APICAL MERISTEM gene of Petunia is required for pattern formation in embryos and flowers and is expressed at meristem and primordia boundaries. Cell 85, 159–170 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Takada, S., Hibara, K., Ishida, T. & Tasaka, M. The CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON1 gene of Arabidopsis regulates shoot apical meristem formation. Development 128, 1127–1135 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Weir, I. et al. CUPULIFORMIS establishes lateral organ boundaries in Antirrhinum. Development 131, 915–922 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Cubas, P., Lauter, N., Doebley, J. & Coen, E. The TCP domain: a motif found in proteins regulating plant growth and development. Plant J. 18, 215–222 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Rhoades, M. W. et al. Prediction of plant microRNA targets. Cell 110, 513–520 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Baker, C. C., Sieber, P., Wellmer, F. & Meyerowitz, E. M. The early extra petals1 mutant uncovers a role for microRNA miR164c in regulating petal number in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 15, 303–315 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Laufs, P., Peaucelle, A., Morin, H. & Traas, J. MicroRNA regulation of the CUC genes is required for boundary size control in Arabidopsis meristems. Development 131, 4311–4322 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Mallory, A. C., Dugas, D. V., Bartel, D. P. & Bartel, B. MicroRNA regulation of NAC-domain targets is required for proper formation and separation of adjacent embryonic, vegetative and floral organs. Curr. Biol. 14, 1035–1046 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Soltis, D. E. et al. Missing links: the genetic architecture of flower and floral diversification. Trends Plant Sci. 7, 22–31 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. van Tunen, A. J., Eikelboom, W. & Angenent, G. Floral organogenesis in Tulipa. Flow. News Lett. 16, 33–37 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Ochiai, T. et al. The differentiation of sepal and petal morphologies in Commelinaceae. Gene 343, 253–262 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Ambrose, B. A. et al. Molecular and genetic analyses of the silky1 gene reveal conservation in floral organ specification between eudicots and monocots. Mol. Cell 5, 569–579 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Mena, M. et al. Diversification of C-function activity in maize flower development. Science 274, 1537–1540 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Kang, H. -G., Jeon, J. -S., Lee, S. & An, G. Identification of class B and class C floral organ identity genes from rice plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 38, 1021–1029 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Yamaguchi, T. et al. The YABBY gene DROOPING LEAF regulates carpel specification and midrib development in Oryza sativa. Plant Cell 16, 500–509 (2004). This paper identifies a novel role for a YABBY gene in carpel identity specification in rice.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Tsukaya, H. Organ shape and size: a lesson from studies of leaf morphogenesis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 6, 57–62 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Hu, Y., Xie, A. & Chua, N. -H. The Arabidopsis auxin-inducible gene ARGOS controls lateral organ size. Plant Cell 15, 1951–1961 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Elliot, R. C. et al. AINTEGUMENTA, an APETALA2-like gene of Arabidopsis with pleiotropic roles in ovule development and floral organ growth. Plant Cell 8, 155–168 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  110. Klucher, K. M., Chow, H., Reiser, L. & Fischer, R. L. The AINTEGUMENTA gene of Arabidopsis required for ovule and female gametophyte development is related to the floral homeotic gene APETALA2. Plant Cell 8, 137–153 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Krizek, B. A. Ectopic expression of AINTEGUMENTA in Arabidopsis plants results in increased growth of floral organs. Dev. Genet. 25, 224–236 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Mizukami, Y. & Fischer, R. L. Plant organ size control: AINTEGUMENTA regulates growth and cell numbers during organogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 942–947 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. Waites, R. & Hudson, A. phantastica: a gene required for dorsoventrality of leaves in Antirrhinum majus. Development 121, 2143–2154 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Golz, J. F., Roccaro, M., Kuzoff, R. & Hudson, A. GRAMINIFOLIA promotes growth and polarity of Antirrhinum leaves. Development 131, 3661–3670 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Siegfried, K. R. et al. Members of the YABBY gene family specify abaxial cell fate in Arabidopsis. Development 126, 4117–4128 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Crawford, B. C. W., Nath, U., Carpenter, R. & Coen, E. CINCINNATA controls both cell differentiation and growth in petal lobes and leaves of Antirrhinum. Plant Physiol. 135, 244–253 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Juenger, T., Perez-Perez, J. M., Bernal, S. & Micol, J. L. Quantitative trait loci mapping of floral and leaf morphology traits in Arabidopsis thaliana: evidence for modular genetic architecture. Evol. Dev. 7, 259–271 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Linnaeus, C. De Peloria (Diss. Ac. Amoenitates Academicae III, Uppsala, 1749).

    Google Scholar 

  119. Galego, L. & Almeida, J. Role of DIVARICATA in the control of dorsoventral symmetry in Antirrhinum flowers. Genes Dev. 16, 880–891 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Perez-Rodriguez, M., Jaffe, F. W., Butelli, E., Glover, B. J. & Martin, C. Development of three different cell types is associated with the activity of a specific MYB transcription factor in the ventral petal of Antirrhinum majus flowers. Development 132, 359–370 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Luo, D., Carpenter, R., Vincent, C., Copsey, L. & Coen, E. Origin of floral asymmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature 383, 794–799 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Luo, D. et al. Control of organ asymmetry in flowers of Antirrhinum. Cell 99, 367–376 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Corley, S. B., Carpenter, R., Copsey, L. & Coen, E. Floral asymmetry involves an interplay between TCP and MYB transcription factors in Antirrhinum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5068–5073 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Cubas, P., Vincent, C. & Coen, E. An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry. Nature 401, 157–161 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Jofuku, K. D., den Boer, B. G. W., van Montagu, M. & Okamuro, J. K. Control of Arabidopsis flower and seed development by the homeotic gene APETALA2. Plant Cell 6, 1211–1225 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Mandel, M. A., Gustafson-Brown, C., Savidge, B. & Yanofsky, M. F. Molecular characterization of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene APETALA1. Nature 360, 273–277 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Goto, K. & Meyerowitz, E. M. Function and regulation of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene PISTILLATA. Genes Dev. 8, 1548–1560 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Jack, T., Brockman, L. L. & Meyerowitz, E. M. The homeotic gene APETALA3 of Arabidopsis thaliana encodes a MADS box and is expressed in petals and stamens. Cell 68, 683–697 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Weigel, D. & Meyerowitz, E. M. Activation of floral homeotic genes in Arabidopsis. Science 261, 1723–1726 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Yanofsky, M. F. et al. The protein encoded by the Arabidopsis homeotic gene agamous resembles transcription factors. Nature 346, 35–39 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Flanagan, C. A. & Ma, H. Spatially and temporally regulated expression of the MADS box gene AGL2 in wild-type and mutant Arabidopsis flowers. Plant Mol. Biol. 26, 581–595 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Savidge, B., Rounsley, S. D. & Yanofsky, M. F. Temporal relationship between the transcription of two Arabidopsis MADS box genes and the floral organ identity genes. Plant Cell 7, 721–33 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. Mandel, M. A. & Yanofsky, M. F. The Arabidopsis AGL9 MADS box gene is expressed in young flower primordia. Sex. Plant Reprod. 11, 22–28 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank E. Coen, G. Ditta, M. Yanofsky, G. Angenent and P. McSteen for supplying photographs, and Y. Eshed for communicating results prior to publication. We acknowledge support for our work from the United States Department of Agriculture, the National Science Foundation, and the United States Department of Energy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer C. Fletcher.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Related links

Related links

DATABASES

TAIR

ag

AGL24

AP1

ap2

ap3

CAL

hen2

hen4

HUA1

HUA2

LFY

pi

sep1

sep2

sep3

SHP1

SHP2

STK

TFL1

TRX1

UFO

WUS

FURTHER INFORMATION

Arabidopsis 2010–Establishing regulatory networks in Arabidopsis

Beth Krizek's web site

Elliot Meyerowitz's laboratory

Enrico Coen's laboratory

Floral Genome Project

Maize Genetics and Genomics Database

Martin Yanofsky's laboratory

Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research

The Arabidopsis Information Resource

The Fletcher Laboratory

Glossary

CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION

A method to determine the in vivo binding of a protein to a DNA sequence.

INFLORESCENCE MERISTEM

The growing shoot tip during the reproductive, flower-producing phase of development.

WHORL

A concentric ring of floral organs.

PERIANTH

The outermost sterile floral organs that include sepals, petals and tepals.

TEPAL

The organ of a flower perianth in which first and second-whorl organs have the same form.

OVULES

The organs within the carpels that contain the embryo sac and develop into seeds.

FLORAL MERISTEM

A group of cells that is initiated by the inflorescence meristem that generates the organs of a flower.

INDETERMINATE

A structure undergoing growth without a defined end.

INFLORESCENCE

A shoot that contains more than one flower.

HOMEOTIC TRANSFORMATION

An event in which an organ of one type assumes the identity of another type within a meristic series.

EUDICOT

A plant that forms two seed leaves during embryogenesis and has three or more pores in its pollen.

MONOCOT

A plant that forms a single seed leaf during embryogenesis.

QUARTET MODEL

This model proposes that tetrameric complexes of MADS proteins determine floral-organ identity in each whorl.

CADASTRAL

A gene activity that defines the boundaries of a region within a flower.

DIFFERENTIAL DISPLAY SCREEN

A molecular method to identify sequences that are enriched in one genotype or set of conditions compared with another.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krizek, B., Fletcher, J. Molecular mechanisms of flower development: an armchair guide. Nat Rev Genet 6, 688–698 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1675

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1675

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing