Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Characterization of the prime and non-prime active site specificities of proteases by proteome-derived peptide libraries and tandem mass spectrometry

Abstract

To link cleaved substrates in complex systems with a specific protease, the protease active site specificity is required. Proteomic identification of cleavage sites (PICS) simultaneously determines both the prime- and non-prime-side specificities of individual proteases through identification of hundreds of individual cleavage sequences from biologically relevant, proteome-derived peptide libraries. PICS also identifies subsite cooperativity. To generate PICS peptide libraries, cellular proteomes are digested with a specific protease such as trypsin. Following protease inactivation, primary amines are protected. After incubation with a test protease, each prime-side cleavage fragment has a free newly formed N-terminus, which is biotinylated for affinity isolation and identification by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. The corresponding non-prime sequences are derived bioinformatically. The step-by-step protocol also presents a web service for PICS data analysis, as well as introducing and validating PICS peptide libraries made from Escherichia coli.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: PICS library generation.
Figure 2: PICS specificity assay.
Figure 3: Comparison of MMP-2 specificity profiles from peptide-centric (PICS3) and protein-based (TAILS8) approaches. Human or bacterial (E. coli) peptide libraries yield comparable specificity profiles, thereby validating the use of bacterial peptide libraries for PICS experiments with eukaryotic enzymes.
Figure 4: Timeline for PICS library generation and PICS specificity assay.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schechter, I. & Berger, A. On the active site of proteases. 3. Mapping the active site of papain; specific peptide inhibitors of papain. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 32, 898–902 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schilling, O. & Overall, C.M. Proteomic discovery of protease substrates. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 11, 36–45 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schilling, O. & Overall, C.M. Proteome-derived, database-searchable peptide libraries for identifying protease cleavage sites. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 685–694 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Auf dem Keller, U. & Schilling, O. Proteomic techniques and activity-based probes for the system-wide study of proteolysis. Biochimie 92, 1705–1714 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Matthews, D.J. & Wells, J.A. Substrate phage: selection of protease substrates by monovalent phage display. Science 260, 1113–1117 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Boulware, K.T. & Daugherty, P.S. Protease specificity determination by using cellular libraries of peptide substrates (CLiPS). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 7583–7588 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Turk, B.E., Huang, L.L., Piro, E.T. & Cantley, L.C. Determination of protease cleavage site motifs using mixture-based oriented peptide libraries. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 661–667 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kleifeld, O. et al. Isotopic labeling of terminal amines in complex samples identifies protein N-termini and protease cleavage products. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 281–288 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sukuru, S.C.K. et al. A lead discovery strategy driven by a comprehensive analysis of proteases in the peptide substrate space. Protein Sci. 19, 2096–2109 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schilling, O. & Overall, C.M. Protease subsite profiling with proteome-derived peptide libraries (PICS). Nat. Protoc. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.88 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Perkins, D.N., Pappin, D.J., Creasy, D.M. & Cottrell, J.S. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 20, 3551–3567 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Craig, R. & Beavis, R.C. TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 20, 1466–1467 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A.I., Kolker, E. & Aebersold, R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 74, 5383–5392 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pedrioli, P.G.A. Trans-proteomic pipeline: a pipeline for proteomic analysis. Methods Mol. Biol. 604, 213–238 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Colaert, N., Helsens, K., Martens, L., Vandekerckhove, J. & Gevaert, K. Improved visualization of protein consensus sequences by iceLogo. Nat. Methods 6, 786–787 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank B. Mayer for technical assistance in establishing the simplified PICS library generation workflow. O.S. acknowledges support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, grants SCHI 871/1-1 and 871/2-1) and the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (MSFHR). P.F.H. is supported by Postdoctoral Fellowships of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) and the MSFHR. O.B. acknowledges support from the Swiss National Foundation of Sciences (SNF) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). C.M.O. is supported by a Canada Research Chair in Metalloproteinase Proteomics and Systems Biology. This work was supported by a grant from the CIHR and from a program project grant in Breast Cancer Metastases from the Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance (CBCRA) with funds from the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation and the Cancer Research Society, as well as by an Infrastructure Grant from MSHFR.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

O.S. and C.M.O. designed and developed the PICS procedure. O.S. and U.a.d.K. developed the web-based analysis platform, P.F.H. established bacterial libraries and O.S., P.F.H. and O.B. optimized the protocol. O.S. drafted the manuscript and O.S. and P.F.H. designed the figures. All authors edited and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher M Overall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schilling, O., Huesgen, P., Barré, O. et al. Characterization of the prime and non-prime active site specificities of proteases by proteome-derived peptide libraries and tandem mass spectrometry. Nat Protoc 6, 111–120 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2010.178

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2010.178

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing