Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Volume 12 Issue 4, April 1996

Editorial

Top of page ⤴

News & Views

Top of page ⤴

Correspondence

Top of page ⤴

Commentary

  • There are two biological properties of genomic methylation patterns that can be regarded as established. First, methylation of 5′-CpG-3′ dinucleotides within promoters represses transcription, often to undetectable levels. Second, in most cases methylation patterns are subject to clonal inheritance. These properties suit methylation patterns for a number of biological roles, although none of the current hypotheses can be regarded as proved or disproved. One hypothesis suggests that the activity of parasitic sequence elements is repressed by selective methylation. Features of invasive sequences that might allow their identification and inactivation are discussed in terms of the genome defense hypothesis. Identification of the cues that direct de novo methylation may reveal the biological role (or roles) of genomic methylation patterns.

    • Timothy H. Bestor
    • Benjamin Tycko
    Commentary
Top of page ⤴

Article

Top of page ⤴

Letter

Top of page ⤴

Erratum

Top of page ⤴

Correction

Top of page ⤴

Search

Quick links