Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Free Association (blog)
Supplements
Focuses
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
Reprints and permissions
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Biotechnology
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Medicine
Nature Methods
Nature Reviews Cancer
Nature Reviews Genetics
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
news@nature.com
Nature Conferences
RNAi Gateway
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Perspective
Nature Genetics  36, 943 - 947 (2004)
Published online: 30 August 2004; | doi:10.1038/ng1422

Towards sound epistemological foundations of statistical methods for high-dimensional biology

Tapan Mehta1, 2, Murat Tanik1, 2 & David B Allison1, 3

1  Department of Biostatistics, Section on Statistical Genetics, Ryals Public Health Building, Suite 327; University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1665 University Boulevard, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA.

2  Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering; University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1665 University Boulevard, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA.

3  Clinical Nutrition Research Center; University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1665 University Boulevard, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA.

Correspondence should be addressed to David B Allison dallison@uab.edu
A sound epistemological foundation for biological inquiry comes, in part, from application of valid statistical procedures. This tenet is widely appreciated by scientists studying the new realm of high-dimensional biology, or 'omic' research, which involves multiplicity at unprecedented scales. Many papers aimed at the high-dimensional biology community describe the development or application of statistical techniques. The validity of many of these is questionable, and a shared understanding about the epistemological foundations of the statistical methods themselves seems to be lacking. Here we offer a framework in which the epistemological foundation of proposed statistical methods can be evaluated.


MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

 Top
Abstract
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Full textFull text
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

Competing financial interests
Figures & Tables
Export citation
natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Nature Genetics
ISSN: 1061-4036
EISSN: 1546-1718
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2004 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy