Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Free Association (blog)
Supplements
Focuses
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
Reprints and permissions
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Biotechnology
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Medicine
Nature Methods
Nature Reviews Cancer
Nature Reviews Genetics
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
news@nature.com
Nature Conferences
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Letter
Nature Genetics  25, 440 - 443 (2000)
doi:10.1038/78140

A systematic, genome-wide, phenotype-driven mutagenesis programme for gene function studies in the mouse

Patrick M. Nolan1, Jo Peters1, Mark Strivens1, Derek Rogers2, Jim Hagan2, Nigel Spurr3, Ian C. Gray3, Lucie Vizor1, Debra Brooker1, Elaine Whitehill1, Rebecca Washbourne1, Tertius Hough1, Simon Greenaway1, Mazda Hewitt1, Xinhong Liu1, Stefan McCormack1, Karen Pickford1, Rachael Selley1, Christine Wells1, Zuzanna Tymowska-Lalanne1, Phil Roby1, Peter Glenister1, Claire Thornton1, Caroline Thaung1, 9, Julie-Anne Stevenson1, Ruth Arkell1, Philomena Mburu1, Rachel Hardisty1, Amy Kiernan4, Alexandra Erven4, Karen P. Steel4, Stephanie Voegeling5, Jean-Louis Guenet5, Carole Nickols6, Ramin Sadri6, Mahmood Naase6, Adrian Isaacs7, Kay Davies7, Mick Browne3, Elizabeth M.C. Fisher8, Jo Martin6, Sohaila Rastan3, Steve D.M. Brown1 & Jackie Hunter2

1 MRC Mammalian Genetics Unit and Mouse Genome Centre, Harwell, UK.

2 Department of Neuroscience, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, New Frontiers Science Park, Harlow, UK.

3 Department of Biotechnology & Genetics, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, New Frontiers Science Park, Harlow, UK.

4 MRC Institute of Hearing Research, University Park, Nottingham, UK.

5 Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.

6 Department of Morbid Anatomy, Queen Mary and Westfield College, London, UK.

7 Department of Human Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

8 Department of Neurogenetics, Imperial College, London, UK.

9 MRC Human Genetics Unit, Edinburgh, UK.

Correspondence should be addressed to Steve D.M. Brown s.brown@har.mrc.ac.uk
As the human genome project approaches completion, the challenge for mammalian geneticists is to develop approaches for the systematic determination of mammalian gene function. Mouse mutagenesis will be a key element of studies of gene function1, 2, 3. Phenotype-driven approaches using the chemical mutagen ethylnitrosourea4, 5, 6 (ENU) represent a potentially efficient route for the generation of large numbers of mutant mice that can be screened for novel phenotypes. The advantage of this approach is that, in assessing gene function, no a priori assumptions are made about the genes involved in any pathway. Phenotype-driven mutagenesis is thus an effective method for the identification of novel genes and pathways1, 2. We have undertaken a genome-wide, phenotype-driven screen for dominant mutations in the mouse. We generated and screened over 26,000 mice, and recovered some 500 new mouse mutants. Our work, along with the programme reported in the accompanying paper7, has led to a substantial increase in the mouse mutant resource and represents a first step towards systematic studies of gene function in mammalian genetics.

We treated male BALB/c mice with ENU, mated them with C3H females and screened F1 hybrid progeny (using a variety of protocols) for new mutant phenotypes. We obtained 26,047 F1 progeny and established a control cohort of F1 mice from non-mutagenized BALB/c males to set baseline parameters. We screened all mice at birth and weaning for visible anomalies such as craniofacial, limb and tail defects (Table 1 and Fig. 1). At five weeks, we screened mice using the SHIRPA (for SmithKline Beecham, Harwell, Imperial College, Royal London Hospital, phenotype assessment) protocol8. SHIRPA is a comprehensive phenotype assessment tool, involving a battery of up to 40 simple tests, that is used to detect mutants in areas such as lower motor neuron/muscle function, spinocerebellar function, sensory function, neuropsychiatric function and autonomic function. We screened 13,375 F1 mice using SHIRPA. A large fraction of progeny (Tables 1 and 2) has also undergone two behavioural testing protocols at six weeks of age. First, we used measurements of locomotor activity (LMA) to identify deficits in motor function. Abnormally high or low activity may be indicative of neurobehavioural deficits. Second, we undertook screens for abnormal acoustic startle response and deficits in pre-pulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response. Deficits in PPI have been associated with a number of psychiatric disorders in human9. We screened 8,500 F1 mice for abnormal LMA and 9,000 mice for deficits in PPI. We also instituted clinical chemistry screens and analysed blood from 1,454 F1 mice for 17 parameters (Table 1). All data from the mutagenesis programme, including phenotypes, are archived on Mutabase, a distributed data recording system specifically developed for this programme (http://www.mgu.har.mrc.ac.uk/mutabase).

Figure 1. A few mutants with visible phenotypes detected in the mutagenesis programme.
Figure 1 thumbnail

a, Nanomouse (Nano), GENA50. b, Dominant spotting (KitW-39H), GENA133. c, A microphthalmia mutant, GENA163. d,e, Batface, a craniofacial mutant, GENA123.



Full FigureFull Figure and legend (57K)
Table 1. Screening protocols
Table 1 thumbnail

Full TableFull Table
Table 2. Numbers of mice tested along with phenotypes and inherited mutations identified
Table 2 thumbnail

Full TableFull Table
From the various screens, we identified 1,089 mice with visible or other anomalies. We introduced 339 mice into inheritance testing by mating founder F1s with C3H (each potential mutant being assigned a GENA number). Routinely, we recovered and rescreened 20−25 progeny from these matings to assess inheritance of dominant phenotypes. We confirmed 126 phenotypes as inherited (Table 2) and 140 phenotypes as not inherited (which includes mice that failed to breed due to illness or fertility problems and those that died before inheritance testing). Also, 73 potential mutants are still in inheritance testing. Thus approximately 50% of the phenotypes uncovered in the programme are true inherited dominant mutations. Overall, we can extrapolate that we have recovered approximately 500 mutants from the screening programme. The rate of recovery of dominant mutations is approximately 2%. We have successfully recovered mutants in all phenotypic areas screened (Table 2). Finally, during inheritance testing we observed only one instance of segregation of elements of the mutant phenotype, GENA191. Whereas the founder mutant mouse showed both abnormal gait and corneal opacity, these two phenotypes appeared to segregate in the progeny. This indicates that, despite the fact that ENU would be expected to introduce multiple hits around the genome, most mutant phenotypes are effectively monogenic.

We used fresh or frozen spermatazoa from original mutant F1 founders (or alternatively from male backcross progeny of founders) to undertake speed backcrosses using in vitro fertilization10 (IVF), mapping a significant fraction of the 126 confirmed mutants. Sperm from mutant animals was used to fertilize C3H oocytes for the rapid, simultaneous generation of large numbers of backcross progeny. Normally, over 100 backcross progeny were produced from each IVF session, scored and tail tipped for DNAs. We used a rapid genotyping approach involving pooling of affected DNAs and fluorescent genotyping of DNA pools using a set of over 200 SSLPs spanning the mouse genome. Overall, we mapped 30 of the confirmed mutants, allowing us to establish that many carry mutations at previously unidentified loci in the mouse genome. In total, 13 mutants (GENA22, 29, 38, 42, 50, 65, 70, 77, 78, 104, 161, 175 and 180) appear to represent novel mutations, of which 3 (22, 50 and 161) appear to be X-linked on the basis of male lethality. We confirmed eight mutations with phenotypes suggesting they represented alleles of known loci on the basis of allelism tests. We mapped six circling mutations (25, 41, 47, 52, 60 and 137), indicative of a vestibular defect, to proximal chromosome 4 in the region of the wheels (Whl) allele11 that may represent new alleles at this locus (manuscript in preparation). Finally, two mutations (51 and 57) were mapped to chromosome 11 and identified as mutations at the Pmp22 locus (manuscript submitted). Thus, this mutagenesis programme has extended both the breadth and the depth of the mouse mutant resource.

We have undertaken the archiving of novel phenotypes arising from the mutagenesis programme irrespective of their status as confirmed inherited mutations. All male F1 progeny demonstrating detectable phenotypes are archived by sperm freezing10. In addition, ovaries from females with abnormal phenotypes are frozen. All phenotypic data can be perused at the ENU Mutagenesis Programme web site (http://www.mgu.har.mrc.ac.uk/mutabase/). All mutants are freely available to non-commercial researchers without restrictions on research and can be requested at the above web site.

Methods
Animals.
We carried out animal studies under the guidance issued by the Medical Research Council12 and Home Office Project Licence no. 30/1517. For this study, we used male BALB/c mice (Charles River). To determine the most appropriate dosage regimen for BALB/c males, we injected males intraperitoneally at approx10 weeks of age with 2times80, 2times100, 1times160 or 1times200 mg/kg ENU (Sigma). We recorded average length of temporary sterility, lethality of injected males, average litter size and average number of dominant phenotypes per injected male. Procedures for ENU administration, including detailed safety procedures, have been described13. Comparison of pilot data indicated that the 2times100 mg/kg dose was the most effective for BALB/c males. We injected batches of 300 BALB/c males at 6 monthly intervals to ensure a constant weekly supply of up to 300 F1 progeny for phenotypic screens. A maximum of 50 progeny was screened per BALB/c male injected. Phenotypic screens were routinely carried out on F1 progeny of mutagenized males mice crossed to C3H/HeN females (Charles River), as well as on mouse lines selected for inheritance testing, on inbred strains and on a control cohort of BALB/ctimesC3H/He F1 hybrid mice. Mating cages contained one male and up to two females. Following weaning at three weeks of age, the screening population was group housed in cages of up to five mice. For inheritance testing, we generally backcrossed F1 mice to the C3H/He strain and classified at least 20 progeny for the phenotype identified in the founder.

Dysmorphology screen.
We classified progeny of mutagenized males at birth and up to weaning. Size defects at birth were recorded by weighing the abnormal neonate plus two siblings of the same sex.

SHIRPA screen.
At five weeks of age, we assessed all mice using the SHIRPA protocol8. The screen, involving a battery of up to 40 simple tests, is semi-quantitative and based on modifications to earlier screens14. The procedure was carried out in a simple testing arena and took approx10 min per mouse. Once abnormal phenotypes at SHIRPA were identified, an independent operator confirmed results. Full details on setting up and effecting the SHIRPA screen are available (http://www.mgc.har.mrc.ac.uk/mutabase/shirpa_summary.html).

Quantitative behavioural screens.
For the purposes of this programme, we carried out two simple behavioural screens on F1 progeny at six weeks of age. To monitor locomotor activity, we analysed mice in cages equipped with beam-splitting devices (Benwick Electronics). Activity was measured by recording the number of beam splits and the number of cage transitions over a 35-min test period in bins of 5-min duration. Total activity and transitions were measured over the last 30 min of this time period. Values in the first 5-min bin were ignored due to extreme variations in results. To monitor acoustic startle response and pre-pulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response (PPI), we tested mice in soundproofed custom-built startle chambers. Tests were divided into startle and PPI sessions and the entire procedure lasted approx40 min. For the startle response, a session consisted of a 5-min acclimation period followed by three types of trials presented a total of 15 times each in pseudorandom order: 110-db pulse at a frequency of 12 or 20 kHz, or white noise. Responses were expressed in arbitrary units and averaged for each type of trial. Duration of pulses was 10 ms and the interval between pulses was 25 s. For PPI, animals received either a pulse alone (white noise, 110 db) or pulse preceded by a 90-db pre-pulse at a frequency of either 12 or 20 kHz. The interval between pre-pulse and pulse was 100 ms. Again each trial was presented a total of 15 times in pseudorandom order. Startle responses of mice when given a pulse following a pre-pulse were expressed as a percentage of the pulse response alone and values were averaged over the trial period. For LMA, startle and PPI testing, mice with any measured value greater than 3 s.d. from the population mean were considered as outliers. The behaviour of an individual was confirmed by retesting after one week.

Clinical biochemistry.
We carried out blood sampling between 8 and 12 weeks of age. Plasma (125 mul) was required to perform the current standard profile of 17 clinical assays using an Olympus AU400 analyser. Two criteria were used to identify potential outliers: mice with values greater than 3 s.d. from the mean for any one parameter or greater than 2 s.d. from the mean for groups of related parameters. We retested mice meeting either of these criteria after one month.

Cryopreservation of mouse spermatozoa and mouse ovarian tissue and IVF of mouse oocytes.
Sperm freezing and the use of IVF have been described10. For ovary freezing, we cut ovaries from mature mice into several pieces and froze them in a cryoprotectant solution of dimethyl sulphoxide (1.5 M) and 10% fetal bovine serum in medium M2 as described14. The pieces of ovary were placed in cryoprotectant (0.3 ml) in 1.8-ml Nunc cryotubes and held on ice for 20 min. The samples were cooled to -8 °C at 2 °C/min where ice formation (seeding) was induced by touching the cryotubes near the meniscus of the cryoprotectant with forceps cooled in liquid nitrogen. Cooling was then continued at 0.3 °C/min to -40 °C, whereupon the samples were plunged into liquid nitrogen and stored in liquid nitrogen.

Genetic mapping.
We took tail snips from backcross mice and extracted DNA using a Nucleon HT extraction kit. For each mutant line, we combined equimolar aliquots of DNA from mutant mice and scanned duplicate DNA pools with a set of up to 229 CA repeat markers spanning the mouse genome with a spacing of <20 cM. Markers were derived from the Whitehead/MIT database (http://www-genome.wi.mit.edu/). For those strains with a fully penetrant mutant phenotype, genotyping of the mutant DNA pools was complemented by analysis of pools derived from non-mutant backcross animals. We used a minimum of 40 mice for each genome scan. Putative hits from the pooled scan were confirmed by genotyping individual mice. We mapped five circling mutants, 25, 41, 47, 52 and 60, using agarose gel electrophoresis, and details of procedures for the mapping of these mutants will be reported elsewhere (manuscript in preparation).

Data capture and analysis.
All raw and derived data from the programme were stored on a custom designed, distributed database system, Mutabase (http://www.mgu.har.mrc.ac.uk/mgu-about/infor.html). This system comprises an industrial strength database (Sybase Adaptive Enterprise Server, Sybase), application middleware (including World-Wide Web, CORBA and JDBC interfaces) and a standard World-Wide Web browser, client interface. The user interface for Mutabase gives access to functions related to animal husbandry and tracking, behavioural and other screens, and a number of tools to analyse and summarize data. Mutabase is accessible through generic workstations (Windows NT) running a World-Wide Web browser (Netscape Communicator, Netscape) connected to servers via a 100 Mbit network. We used customized barcode technology for both cage and sample labelling, reducing transcription errors when entering data into Mutabase.

 Top
Received 1 February 2000; Accepted 25 April 2000

REFERENCES
  1. Peters, J. & Brown, S.D.M. Combining mutagenesis and genomics in the mouse—closing the phenotype gap. Trends Genet. 12, 433–435 (1996). | Article | PubMed  | ISI |
  2. Brown, S.D.M. & Nolan, P.M. Mouse mutagenesis—systematic studies of mammalian gene function. Hum. Mol. Genet. 7, 1627–1633 (1998). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  3. Justice, M., Noveroske, J.K., Weber, J.S., Zheng, B. & Bradley, A. Mouse ENU mutagenesis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 8, 1955–1963 (1999). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  4. Russell, W.L. et al. Specific locus test shows ethylnitrosourea to be the most potent mutagen in the mouse. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 76, 5918–5922 (1979).
  5. Shedlovsky, A, McDonald, J.D., Symula, D. & Dove, W.F. Mouse models of human phenylketonuria. Genetics 134, 1205–1210 (1993). | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  6. Rinchik, E.M. & Carpenter, D.A. N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea mutagenesis of a 6- to 11-cM subregion of the Fah-Hbb interval of mouse chromosome 7: completed testing of 4,557 gametes and deletion mapping and complementation analysis of 31 mutations. Genetics 152, 373–383 (1999). | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  7. Hrabe de Angelis, M. et al. Genome-wide, large-scale production of mutant mice by ENU mutagenesis. Nature Genet. 25, 444–447 (2000). | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  8. Rogers, D.C. et al. Behavioural and functional analysis of mouse phenotype: SHIRPA, a proposed protocol for comprehensive phenotype assessment. Mamm. Genome 8, 711–713 (1997). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  9. Geyer, M.A. & Braff, D.L. Startle habituation and sensorimotor gating in schizophrenia and related animal models. Schizophr. Bull. 13, 643–668 (1987). | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  10. Thornton, C.E., Brown, S.D.M. & Glenister, P.H. Large numbers of mice established by in vitro fertilisation with cryopreserved spermatazoa: implications and applications for genetic resource banks, mutagenesis screens and mouse backcrosses. Mamm. Genome 10, 987–992 (1999). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  11. Nolan, P.M. et al. Heterozygosity mapping of partially congenic lines: mapping of a semi-dominant neurological mutation, wheels (Whl), on mouse chromosome 4. Genetics 140, 245–254 (1995). | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  12. Medical Research Council Responsibility In the Use of Animals for Medical Research (Medical Research Council, London, 1993).
  13. Nolan, P.M., Kapfhamer, D. & Bucan, M. Random mutagenesis screen for dominant behavioural mutations in mice. Methods 13, 379–395 (1997). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  14. Irwin, S. Comprehensive observational assessment: 1a. A systematic, quantitative procedure for assessing the behavioural and physiologic state of the mouse. Psychopharmacalogica 13, 222–257 (1968). | ChemPort |
  15. Candy, C.J., Wood, M.J. & Whittingham, D.G. Effect of cryoprotectants on the survival of follicles in frozen mouse ovaries. J. Reprod. Fert. 110, 1–19 (1997).
 Top
Acknowledgments
We thank A. Jordan, N. Chobrot, K. Arnold, N. Sear, A. Parker, J. Airey,M. Boatfield, S. Mansell, C. Johns, S. Clements, A. Nash, S. Smythe, I. Latham, K. Doncaster, C. Parsons and L. Rooke for technical assistance. This work was supported by the Medical Research Council, SmithKline Beecham, the European Union, the Motor Neuron Disease Association and the Birth Defects Foundation.

FULL TEXT
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
Save this linkSave this link

naturejobs

Methods
Figures & Tables
Acknowledgments
References
Export citation
Export references
natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Nature Genetics
ISSN: 1061-4036
EISSN: 1546-1718
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2000 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy