Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Supplements
Focuses
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Medicine
Neuroscience Gateway
UCSD-Nature Signaling Gateway
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Article
Nature Neuroscience - 9, 1177 - 1185 (2006)
Published online: 6 August 2006; Corrected online: 13 December 2006 | doi:10.1038/nn1745


There is a Corrigendum (January 2007) associated with this Article.

High-resolution imaging reveals highly selective nonface clusters in the fusiform face area

Kalanit Grill-Spector1, 2, Rory Sayres2 & David Ress3

1  Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305, USA.

2  Neuroscience Program, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305, USA.

3  Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, 02912, USA.

Correspondence should be addressed to Kalanit Grill-Spector kalanit@psych.stanford.edu

A region in ventral human cortex (fusiform face area, FFA) thought to be important for face perception responds strongly to faces and less strongly to nonface objects. This pattern of response may reflect a uniform face-selective neural population or activity averaged across populations with heterogeneous selectivity. Using high-resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we found that the FFA has a reliable heterogeneous structure: localized subregions within the FFA highly selective to faces are spatially interdigitated with localized subregions highly selective to different object categories. We found a preponderance of face-selective responses in the FFA, but no difference in selectivity to faces compared to nonfaces. Thus, standard fMRI of the FFA reflects averaging of heterogeneous highly selective neural populations of differing sizes, rather than higher selectivity to faces. These results suggest that visual processing in this region is not exclusive to faces. Overall, our approach provides a framework for understanding the fine-scale structure of neural representations in the human brain.

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

NEWS AND VIEWS

Fine structure in representations of faces and objects

Nature Neuroscience News and Views (01 Sep 2006)

Developing recognition of faces and places

Nature Neuroscience News and Views (01 Apr 2007)

See all 4 matches for News And Views
 Top
Abstract
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Full textFull text
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
rights and permissionsRights and permissions
Order commercial reprintsOrder commercial reprints
CrossRef lists 26 articles citing this articleCrossRef lists 26 articles citing this article
Save this linkSave this link
Figures & Tables
Supplementary info
Export citation

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
Nature Neuroscience
ISSN: 1097-6256
EISSN: 1546-1726
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2006 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy