Abstract
The early event of microtubule–kinetochore attachment is a critical stage for precise chromosome segregation. Here we report that NCAPG2, which is a component of the condensin II complex, mediates chromosome segregation through microtubule–kinetochore attachment by recruiting PLK1 to prometaphase kinetochores. NCAPG2 colocalizes with PLK1 at prometaphase kinetochores and directly interacts with the polo-box domain (PBD) of PLK1 via its highly conserved C-terminal region. In both humans and Caenorhabditis elegans, when NCAPG2 is depleted, the attachment of the spindle to the kinetochore is loosened and misoriented. This is caused by the disruption of PLK1 localization to the kinetochore and by the decreased phosphorylation of its kinetochore substrate, BubR1. In addition, the crystal structure of the PBD of PLK1, in complex with the C-terminal region of NCAPG2, 1007VLS-pT-L1011, exhibits structural conservation of PBD-phosphopeptides, suggesting that the regulation of NCAPG2 function is phosphorylation-dependent. These findings suggest that NCAPG2 plays an important role in regulating proper chromosome segregation through a functional interaction with PLK1 during mitosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Chromosome condensation during mitosis is critical for proper bi-oriented chromosome separation1,2. The production of this mitosis-specific chromosome structure depends primarily on three multiprotein complexes: two condensin complexes and one cohesion complex3. Each condensin complex is composed of two ATPase subunit heterodimers (structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) 2 and 4) and three non-SMC regulatory subunits2,3. A unique set of three non-SMC regulatory components defines each condensin complex; NCAP-D2, NCAP-G and NCAP-H are parts of the condensin I complex, and NCAP-D3, NCAP-G2 and NCAP-H2 are components of the condensin II complex2,3,4. NCAPG and NCAPD2 in the condensin I complex and NCAPG2 and NCAPD3 in the condensin II complex are HEAT-repeat-containing regulatory subunits5. The condensin I complex, which has a conserved structure in both yeast and eukaryotes, is considered a canonical condensin complex functioning in eukaryotic chromosome condensation2. The condensin II complex regulates not only chromosome condensation but also a variety of cellular functions, including chromosome segregation, DNA repair, sister chromatid resolution, gene expression regulation and histone modulation6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16. Interestingly, homozygous mutants of all nematode condensin II complex components show nuclei with abnormal sizes or with an uneven distribution11. In human cells, depleting any condensin II complex component also results in defects in chromosome alignment or segregation13.
The first step of chromosome segregation is microtubule attachment to the kinetochore on the chromosome17. The kinetochore is a protein complex assembly that corresponds to the centromere of the chromosome, where sister chromatids are linked17. Microtubule–kinetochore interactions require precise control to achieve the correct bi-orientation. The early event of microtubule attachment to the kinetochore before stabilizing the interactions is governed by Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1)17,18,19,20,21. PLK1 localization changes based on the microtubule movements during mitosis, from the centrosome to the kinetochore and then to the midbody18,20,22. PLK1 localizes at the kinetochore until chromosome alignment is completed at the metaphase plate18. Until each kinetochore is properly occupied by a microtubule, PLK1 phosphorylates BubR1 and prevents the onset of anaphase19,23,24,25,26. Although some kinetochore proteins may be responsible for PLK1 localization at the kinetochore, further studies are required to identify the PLK1-regulating proteins that critically contribute to the role of PLK1 in microtubule-dependent chromosome alignment17.
Interestingly, the condensin II complex localized at the kinetochore relative to the condensin I complex13,27, suggesting unique functional roles for these complexes during mitosis. However, the detailed mechanism of each condensin II complex component in chromosome segregation regulation remains unclear.
In this study, we investigated the role of NCAPG2, which is a component of the condensin II complex, in chromosome segregation during mitosis using the nematode model Caenorhabditis elegans and a human cell line. Our results demonstrate that NCAPG2 contributes to chromosome segregation via microtubule–kinetochore attachment by mediating PLK1 localization at the kinetochore. This function of NCAPG2 is conserved in both nematodes and mammals and is essential for achieving chromosome integrity during cell division.
Results
NCAPG2 functions in the proper spindle attachment
Although NCAPG2 has been less studied compared with NCAPD3, this subunit is predicted to play important roles similar to the other condensin subunits. To analyse the role of NCAPG2 in mitosis, we employed C. elegans, which is a simple metazoan that has a NCAPG2 homologue, capg-2, and well-conserved condensin I and II complexes11. We depleted capg-2 expression using a bacteria-feeding RNA interference (RNAi) method. Consequently, chromosome segregation defects occurred in both germ cells and embryos (Fig. 1a,b), and these defects were similar to previously reported findings11. Proper chromosome segregation requires accurate orientation of the bipolar spindle attachment to the kinetochore, which is an early event17,28,29. Therefore, we examined CAPG-2 function when the microtubule–kinetochore dynamics were blocked by nocodazole, which interferes with microtubule polymerization. Nocodazole did not directly affect mitosis, and most embryos from the nocodazole-treated worms developed normally. However, combining the nocodazole treatment with capg-2 RNAi induced more severe defects during mitosis in early embryos than capg-2 RNAi alone (Fig. 1b). Moreover, the survival ratio of the progeny from adult worms after the sequential treatment of capg-2 RNAi feeding plus nocodazole was significantly reduced compared with the treatment with capg-2 RNAi feeding alone (Fig. 1c). This synergistic result suggests that CAPG-2 may function in the microtubule–kinetochore interaction during mitosis. Next, we observed the first cleavage process of embryos as a time course to determine the initial defect caused by CAPG-2 depletion during mitotic progression. Although chromosome condensation still occurred during mitosis, chromosome alignment at the metaphase plate was defective in CAPG-2-depleted embryos (Fig. 1d). Surprisingly, spindle attachment to the chromosome tended to be disoriented with capg-2 RNAi feeding (Fig. 1e). These results suggest that capg-2 is involved in the proper orientation of the spindle attachment to the chromosomes in C. elegans.
To further examine the role of NCAPG2 in the microtubule–kinetochore interaction, we observed this interaction following treatment with monastrol, which is an Eg5 spindle motor protein inhibitor that effectively blocks the bipolarity of mitotic spindles in mammalian cells30. Similar to our previous observation in C. elegans, monastrol treatment resulted in deteriorated microtubule–chromosome interactions in NCAPG2-depleted MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 2a). These defective microtubule–kinetochore interactions resulted in complications during chromosome segregation. Centromere fluorescence in situ hybridization showed that NCAPG2-depleted cells treated with nocodazole possessed multiple centromeres compared with the control cells (Fig. 2b,d). For quantification, we counted the number of metaphase chromosomes in each cell. When NCAPG2 was depleted without nocodazole treatment, the population of cells containing more than 2n (=46) chromosomes increased (Fig. 2c). Moreover, the number of cells containing 4n (=92) or more chromosomes greatly increased in NCAPG2-depleted and nocodazole-treated cells (Fig. 2e). This aneuploidy resulting from NCAPG2 depletion is similar to the unusually large nuclei that formed in C. elegans when fed capg-2 RNAi. These findings suggest the involvement of NCAPG2 in the proper interaction between microtubules and kinetochores and, thus, critical roles for NCAPG2 during chromosome segregation in both nematode and mammalian cells.
NCAPG2 functions in BubR1 kinetochore localization
To examine the effect of NCAPG2 function on microtubule–chromosome interactions, we monitored the subcellular localization and phosphorylation of BubR1, which is one of the key kinetochore proteins mediating microtubule–kinetochore attachments23,24,25,26. From prometaphase to anaphase, BubR1 localizes at the kinetochore in a dumbbell-like manner31. Interestingly, the depletion of NCAPG2 clearly interferes with BubR1 localization at the kinetochore (Fig. 3a). We note that BubR1 phosphorylation by PLK1 at the kinetochore is important for facilitating proper interactions between chromosomes and microtubules19,23,25. Thus, we further examined the effect of NCAPG2 depletion on the functional interaction between BubR1 and PLK1 regarding kinetochore localization. Importantly, NCAPG2 depletion also disrupted PLK1 localization at the kinetochore (Fig. 3b). Furthermore, BubR1 phosphorylation at Ser676, which is a known substrate residue of PLK1, decreased in NCAPG2-depleted cells (Fig. 3c). These results indicate that NCAPG2 may be required for PLK1 recruitment to the kinetochore to allow the functional interaction with BubR1.
NCAPG2 is required for PLK1 localization at the kinetochore
Next, we examined whether the PLK1 recruitment to the kinetochore is directly regulated by NCAPG2. For this analysis, first, we examined the subcellular localization of NCAPG2 during mitosis. NCAPG2 was localized as nonspecific spreading in the nucleus during interphase (Supplementary Fig. 1). In prometaphasic cells, NCAPG2 was spotted close to the kinetochore marker CREST (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 1). The existence of NCAPG2 at the kinetochore exhibited similar spatial and temporal localization with PLK1 (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 2). During metaphase, NCAPG2 disappeared from the kinetochore region of the aligned chromosomes but remained at the kinetochores of misaligned chromosomes (Supplementary Fig. 1). During late-phase mitosis, NCAPG2 moved to the midzone and localized at the peripheral region of the midbody (Supplementary Fig. 1).
To examine whether NCAPG2 contributes to PLK1 recruitment to kinetochores, we measured the fluorescence intensity of PLK1 and CREST pseudocolour images. Anti-PLK1 and anti-CREST antibody immunostaining was performed and analysed in control and NCAPG2-depleted cells (Fig. 4). When NCAPG2 expression was downregulated using small interfering RNA (siRNA), the correlation of the immunostaining intensity between PLK1 and CREST became lower than the control (Fig. 4c,d). Moreover, we confirmed the relationship between NGAPG2 expression and PLK1 localization using the in vivo C. elegans model (Fig. 4e,f). The PLK1 homologue in C. elegans, PLK-1 (fused with green-fluorescent protein (GFP)), was expressed simultaneously at holocentric chromosomes and centrosomes during metaphase32. However, in contrast with the centrosome, the GFP::PLK-1 signal was weakened at chromosomes in capg-2-depleted embryos (Fig. 4e,f). We quantified the fluorescence intensity at chromosomes and centrosomes in metaphase cells containing either control or capg-2 RNAi. The relative fluorescence intensity ratio of GFP::PLK-1 in chromosomes compared with that in centrosomes was significantly reduced in capg-2-depleted embryos (Fig. 4f). This result was consistent with the relative fluorescence ratio coefficient found in human cells (Fig. 4d), although the kinetochore structure of mammalian cells is quite different from that of C. elegans. However, PLK1 localization at the midzone and midbody during cytokinesis was not affected by NCAPG2 depletion (Supplementary Fig. 3). These results suggest that NCAPG2 is a critical mediator of PLK1 localization at the kinetochore for the proper microtubule–kinetochore interactions.
NCAPG2 interacts with PLK1
Because NCAPG2 plays a critical role in PLK1 recruitment at the kinetochore, we examined whether NCAPG2 interacts with PLK1. Immunoprecipitation assays performed using the glutathione S-transferase (GST)-tagged full-length PLK1 protein and the FLAG-tagged full-length NCAPG2 protein showed that these two proteins interact with each other (Fig. 5a). In addition, the incubation of FLAG-tagged NCAPG2 with the lysates of cells synchronized largely at prometaphase by nocodazole treatment showed that NCAPG2 forms a complex with endogenous PLK1 (Fig. 5b). To define the region of PLK1 that binds to NCAPG2, we designed various mutants of PLK1 (Fig. 5c). The immunoprecipitation assay showed that the polo-box domain (PBD) of PLK1 was responsible for the interaction with NCAPG2 (Fig. 5d). In addition, PBD domain mutants that included structural defects in the substrate-binding pocket (W414F, V415A, L427A; FAA)33 did not bind to NCAPG2.
Next, we attempted to identify the region of NCAPG2 that binds to PLK1. An in vitro immunoprecipitation experiment using purified GST-PBD (371–594; bacterial expressed) and purified Flag-NCAPG2 (full length, N-terminal (1–714) or C-terminal NCAPG2 (715–1143); mammalian cell expressed) showed that the C-terminal region of NCAPG2 strongly binds to GST-PBD (Fig. 5e,f). These results suggest that the PBD of PLK1 interacts with the C-terminal region of NCAPG2. Given that the PBD of PLK1 preferentially binds to a strictly conserved serine residue followed by a phosphorylated serine or threonine residue (S-pS/T motif) for its proper targeting during mitosis34, we examined whether an S-pS/T motif exists in the C-terminal region of NCAPG2. Thr1010 and the surrounding residues of NCAPG2 are highly conserved from nematodes to mammals (Fig. 6a). We also confirmed the phosphorylation of this residue (Supplementary Fig. 4). When Thr1010 was replaced with alanine, the PLK1 interaction significantly decreased (Fig. 6a,b). The phosphorylated peptide (1006GVLS-pT-LI1012) interacts strongly with the PBD of PLK1, with a Kd value of 69.91±15.95 nM, which was obtained from a fluorescence polarization in vitro binding assay using synthetic peptides (Fig. 6b). We also determined the crystal structure of the PBD of PLK1 in complex with the 5-mer phosphopeptide 1007VLS-pT-L1011 at a resolution of 1.7 Å (Fig. 6c, Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 5). The PBD structure shows the typical architecture that has been previously reported35,36,37,38. Several antiparallel β-sheets from the two PBDs generate a shallow cavity that allows substrate binding. In adiition, the overall conformation of substrate peptides was conserved (Fig. 6d). The phosphothreonine residue (pT1010) forms hydrogen bonds with His538 and with Lys540, similar to other PBD-phosphopeptide structures (Fig. 6d,e)35,36,38. The binding mode of the peptide to the PBD of PLK1 is highly similar to that of other PBD–phosphopeptide complexes (Fig. 6e).
Trp414, which plays important roles in centrosome localization and in substrate binding without affecting kinase activity22, forms multiple hydrogen bonds with the serine residue of the substrate peptide in a direct or water-mediated manner. Moreover, many water molecules found near the phosphothreonine residue form a hydrogen bond network and strengthen the binding affinity, similar to PBD-Cdc25C-primed peptide structures38. A water molecule-mediated hydrogen bond network was formed by Trp414, Asn533 and the oxygen atom of phosphate. In addition, another water molecule forms a hydrogen bond with the carbonyl oxygen of Phe534 and with the oxygen atom of the phosphate in the substrate peptide. In addition, Asp416, His489 and Leu491 also participate in forming hydrogen bonds, and Lys413, Val415, Tyr485 and Leu490 form hydrophobic contacts with the 1010pT peptide. Interestingly, the CL loop, which connects the two PBs (residue 493–507)38 and which is usually activated upon phosphopeptide binding, was partially disordered in our structure.
As the Thr1010 position in NCAPG2 was critical for PLK1 binding, we performed reconstitution experiments after NCAPG2 siRNA transfection. For these experiments, we constructed siRNA resistant-based lentiviral vectors, wild-type or T1010A mutants of NCAPG2 (NCAPG2R-Wt or NCAPG2R-T1010A). When NCAPG2 was depleted, PLK1 localization to the kinetochore disappeared. In contrast to wild-type NCAPG2, which rescued PLK1 localization to the kinetochore, the T1010A mutant was not able to recover PLK1 localization to the kinetochore (Fig. 7a). The relative fluorescence intensities of the PLK1 signal compared with the CREST signal were measured in the kinetochore after reconstitution. Compared with wild type, NCAPG2R-T1010A failed to properly recruit PLK1 to the kinetochore (Fig. 7b). In addition, phosphorylated BubR1, which is shown as a band-shift, became diminished after nocodazole treatment in the T1010A mutant NCAPG2 was reconstituted (Fig. 7c). These results suggest that the NCAPG2 Thr1010 residue and its surrounding region in NCAPG2 are critical for PLK1 localization and function at the kinetochore.
Discussion
Condensin complexes have pivotal functions during mitotic chromosome condensation2. Although the role of the condensin complexes in chromosome segregation is highly conserved from nematodes to mammals11,12,13,14, little is known concerning the specific components of the condensin I or II complex that drive chromosome segregation and how these components function in the diverse steps of chromosome segregation. PLK1 localization at the kinetochore is essential for microtubule–kinetochore attachments and for reliable chromosome segregation39,40,41,42. In this study, we have shown that NCAPG2, which is one of the components of the non-SMC condensin II complex, may contribute to chromosome segregation by recruiting PLK1 to the kinetochore during prometaphase.
To investigate the role of NCAPG2 in chromosome segregation, we used C. elegans and human cells as model systems (Figs 1 and 2). When CAPG-2 was depleted in C. elegans, chromosome condensation occurred normally during early mitosis; however, chromosome alignment at the metaphase plate was delayed, and the chromosome was replicated again without cytokinesis (Fig. 1d). Interestingly, abnormal chromosome alignment by treatment with capg-2-feeding RNAi was caused by a dispersed orientation of the microtubule attachment (Fig. 1e). CAPG-2 depletion caused defects in the proper interaction between microtubules and the kinetochore during early mitosis, resulting in chromosome missegregation. However, these types of defects resulting from CAPG-2 depletion did not occur when other condensin components were depleted in C. elegans14,43. Depletion of the condesin I complex component CAPG-1 occurs in the C. elegans chromosome segregation defect caused by Aurora BAIR2-dependent chromosome obstruction43. CAPG-1 depletion results in cytokinesis failure, which is characterized by anaphase bridge formation43. Moreover, a temperature-sensitive mutant of another component of the condensin II complex, HCP-6 (NCAPD3 homologue in C. elegans), also shows chromosome segregation defects. However, this non-functional hcp-6 mutant shows merotelic kinetochore–microtubule interactions caused by a failure to maintain chromosome rigidity14. The kinetochore–microtubule interaction defects observed in C. elegans are also observed in human cells (Figs 1 and 2). Consistent with previous observations, siRNA-mediated depletion of condensin II components in HeLa cells causes defects in chromosome segregation13. NCAPD3 also plays a role in PLK1 localization to the chromosomal axes44. These results suggest that two individual condensin II components independently recruit PLK1 to different chromosome regions. These NCAPD3 affects on PLK1 during mitosis could explain our observation that the NCAPG2 T1010A mutant still had weak binding to PLK1, although the NCAPG2–PBD interaction was completely abolished when NCAPG2 was unphosphorylated at Thr1010, suggesting indirect binding through the condensin II complex (Fig. 6a,b). Condensin II complex localization at the centromere and at the chromosome arm is important for chromosome function during mitosis13. Mitotic chromosome condensation, which is governed by condensin complex proteins, is necessary for the proper centromere structure for kinetochore complex assembly9. We found in this study that NCAPG2 also has an additional role in proper microtubule attachment to the kinetochore via PLK1 for proper chromosome segregation42,45.
Other proteins may be involved in PLK1 localization and delocalization to the kinetochore; PBIP1, BUB1, NUDC, INCENP and CUL3–KLHL22 may contribute cooperatively with or independent of NCAPG2 (refs 40, 41, 42, 46, 47). However, considering the depletion phenotypes, NCAPG2 plays the most critical role in the kinetochore–microtubule interaction governed by PLK1 during prometaphase to metaphase40,41,46,47,48. Taken together, NCAPG2 contributes to PLK1 kinetochore localization for the kinetochore–microtubule interaction, and CUL3–KLHL22 delocalizes PLK1 from the kinetochore after BubR1 phosphorylation47. These results suggest that PLK1 localization to the kinetochore is governed by different proteins and depends on the timeline of mitosis progression40,47. NCAPG2-regulated PLK1 localization occurs during the initial stage of the microtubule–kinetochore interaction because the NCAPG2 and PLK1 interactions primarily occur during prometaphase, before chromosome alignment is completed.
In addition, our results showed that NCAPG2 is critical for PLK1 kinetochore localization in both human and nematode cells (Fig. 3b and 4c–f), suggesting functional conservation of NCAPG2 in nematodes and vertebrates. Therefore, we hypothesised that the PBD-binding site may be conserved across species and found a conserved PBD-recognition region at the C-terminus of NCAPG2 (Fig. 6a). In human NCAPG2, the PBD-recognition region was 1007VLSpTLI1012, and C. elegans contained a similar sequence, 995SLSpSLL1000. The peptide in C. elegans is relatively conserved within −2 to +2 amino-acid position with the human peptide; however, the threonine is replaced with serine. This region is highly conserved in other species, including Pan troglodytes and Xenopus laevis, indicating that the role of NCAPG2 in PLK1 localization to the kinetochore may be conserved (Fig. 6a). Our immunoprecipitation and in vitro binding assay data indicated that NCAPG2 and PLK1 directly interact with each other in a phosphorylation-dependent manner at Thr1010 (Fig. 6a,b). We confirmed that Thr1010 could be phosphorylated during mitosis by using a phosphospecific antibody (Supplementary Fig. 4). In this study, we also determined the crystal structure of PLK1–PBD in complex with NCAPG2 phosphopeptides. This structure provides a detailed view of the interactions between PLK1 and NCAPG2. In addition, our structure provides another opportunity for developing PLK1 inhibitors that target the PBD. Many extensive studies have been established to develop PLK1 inhibitors that target the PBD49,50,51. These studies were initiated from structural investigations of the PBD and PBIP peptide structures37. As the peptide sequence from NCAPG2 is quite different from PBIP peptides, except for the characteristic S-pT residues, our structure will lay the groundwork for further developing PLK1 inhibitors.
In summary, we found that NCAPG2 is a new critical player in PLK1 kinetochore localization. NCAPG2 interacts with PLK1 during the prometaphase–metaphase transition in unstable microtubule–kinetochore interactions. We suggest a model of NCAPG2 and PLK1 binding at the kinetochore for proper microtubule–kinetochore assembly (Fig. 7d). NCAPG2 localization and PLK1 recruitment to the kinetochores of misaligned chromosomes are critical for the completion of proper chromosome alignment at the metaphase plate. Our study suggests that the conserved function of NCAPG2 is essential for PLK1 localization to kinetochores and for proper chromosome segregation.
Methods
C. elegans strains and RNA interference
C. elegans were cultivated on NGM plates at 20 °C as a standard culture method52. The capg-2 RNAi clone was obtained from Dr J. Ahringer’s bacteria-feeding RNAi library, which was a kind gift from Dr J. Lee (Seoul National University). The wild-type N2 strain was used for measuring embryo lethality when capg-2 RNAi was treated with nocodazole. RW10006 (HIS-72::GFP), XA3501 (GFP::HIS-11 and GFP::TBB-2), JG479 (NPP-1::GFP, mCherry::HIS-58 and GFP::TBB-2) and SA127(GFP::PLK-1) were used to determine the effects of capg-2 knockdown on mitosis. JG479 was generated by crossing XA3501 and OCF3 (NPP-1::GFP and mCherry::HIS-58). HIS-72 is histone 3, and TBB-2 is β-tubulin. Both HIS-11 and HIS-58 are histone 2B proteins ( www.wormbase.org). Most strains were provided by the CGC, which is funded by the NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440). For capg-2 RNA interference, L4 worms were transferred to the RNAi plate, and the F1 embryos were observed. The HT115 Escherichia coli strain, which contains the empty RNAi vector (L4440), was used as the control. To compare the survival ratios of embryos when capg-2 RNAi was treated with or without nocodazole, L4 worms were grown in liquid with or without nocodazole for 12 h after feeding on the capg-2 RNAi or control plates for 12 h. Next, the worms were recovered on NGM plates, and three adult worms were transferred to NGM plates. The worms were removed after laying eggs for 12 h, and the dead embryos were counted the next day. We examined three plates for each case, and all repeated tests showed the same tendency three times. The liquid culture used in the 96-well plates contained E. coli (OP50) and cholesterol, and the culture volumes were 100 μl each of nocodazole (20 μg ml−1) and 1% DMSO (control). All images of C. elegans embryos were observed and captured using an Imager A2 compound microscope (Carl Zeiss) or an LSM700 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss).
Experimental conditions
MDA-MB-231 and HEK293 cells, which were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection, were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s media (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (P/S) in a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C. siRNAs for NCAPG2 were synthesised using 5′-GCUUCAUAGGGUCAUUUAUTT-3′ and 5′-GAAGAAUGAUGCUGAAACATT-3′ sequences (ST Pharm. Co. LTD). Expression vectors or siRNAs were transferred into the cells using the Amaxa Nucleofector system (Amaxa Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For synchronizing cells into a specific phase, 50 ng ml−1 nocodazole (Sigma-Aldrich) or 100 μM monastrol (Sigma-Aldrich) was used.
Immunofluorescence imaging
Cell were grown on coverslips, rinsed twice with PHEM buffer (60 mM PIPES, 25 mM HEPES, 10 mM EGTA and 2 mM MgCl2, pH 6.9 with KOH), permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PHEM buffer at 4 °C for 1 min and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PHEM buffer. The fixed cells were incubated at 4 °C for 1 h with each primary antibody, followed by incubation with a secondary antibody plus 100 ng ml−1 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 3 h. The acquired images were analysed using a confocal microscope (Zeiss 510 Meta, Carl Zeiss).
Counting the chromosome number
Cells were harvested after 4 h colcemid (0.1 μg ml−1) treatment with or without nocodazole (50 ng ml−1) pretreatment. The harvested cells were incubated with a hypertonic solution (0.075 M KCl) and with freshly prepared fixative (methanol/acetic acid, 3:1). The swollen cells were spread on a glass slide. The slides were dried at room temperature, stained with DAPI (100 ng ml−1) and visualized under a confocal microscope.
Vector construction and site-directed mutagenesis
The NCAPG2 expression vectors were constructed using pcDNA3.1, pCMV-3FLAG-1 and pLL3.7 vectors with KpnI/XhoI, EcoRV/XhoI and SmaI/XhoI restriction enzyme sites, respectively. To produce siRNA-resistant NCAPG2 mutants (Lenti-NCAPG2R), the mutants (forward primer: 5′-GAAGACTACCTGAAGCTTCACAGAGTGATTTATCAGCAAATTATCCAGACCTACCTG-3′, reverse primer: 5′-CAGGTAGGTCTGGATAATTTGCTGATAAATCACTCTGTGAAGCTTCAGGTAGTCTTCTTC-3′) were generated using a QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene).
Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting
For the immunoprecipitation experiment, cells were lysed with TAP buffer (25 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 140 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, 10 mM NaF, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 1 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride , 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM β-glycerophosphate, 10% glycerol and 0.2% protease inhibitor cocktail) and incubated with rabbit-IgG (Jackson Laboratory) or anti-FLAG M2 affinity gel (Sigma-Aldrich) at 4 °C. The primary antibodies were purchased from commercial sources as follows: NCAPG2 (Novus Biological, 1/1,000), PLK1 (Novus Biological, 1/1,000), BubR1 (BD Biosciences, 1/1,000), β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich, 1/5,000) and CREST (ImmunoVision, 1/1,000). BubR1 676 antibodies(1/10,000) were prepared as previously reported25.
Full blots are shown in Supplementary Fig. 6.
Expression and purification of PBD of PLK1
The human PLK1–PBD (371–594) was amplified using PCR and cloned into the pGEX6p-1 vector using the EcoRI and XhoI restriction enzyme sites. The protein was overexpressed in E. coli Rosetta2(DE3)pLysS cells (Novagen). The cells were grown at 37 °C in 3 l of Terrific Broth medium to an OD600 of 0.6, and recombinant protein expression was induced with 0.1 mM isopropyl β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 20 °C. The cells were further grown at 20 °C for 20 h after IPTG induction. The purification methods were similar to methods that have been previously reported36. The purified protein was concentrated to 6 mg ml−1 and used for the fluorescence polarization binding assay or for crystal screening.
Crystallization and structure determination
The purified PBD and 5-mer 1010pT peptide (Ac-VLSpTL-NH2; 5 mM final concentration) were mixed and stored on ice for an hour before the crystallization trial. The crystals of the PLK1–PBD in complex with the 1010pT peptide were obtained using the sitting drop vapour diffusion method. Crystals were grown in a reservoir solution of 200 mM potassium iodide, 100 mM MES (pH 6.5) and 25% (v/v) PEG 4000. X-ray diffraction data were collected using an ADSC Q315r CCD detector at Pohang Light Source, Korea. Intensity data were processed and scaled using the program HKL2000 (ref. 53). The structure was determined by molecular replacement using the programme Phaser54, and the model was refined using the programme Phenix55. Manual model building was performed using the programme Coot56.
Fluorescence polarization binding assay for the PBD
For the fluorescence polarization binding assay, fluorescein isothiocyanate-labelled 1010pT (GVLSpTLI) or 1010T (GVLSTLI) peptide was mixed with purified PBD and incubated in a buffer containing 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT and 0.0025% (v/v) Tween 20. The final protein concentrations ranged from 0 to 4 μM, and the final peptide concentration was 10 nM. Fluorescence polarization was analysed 30 min after mixing the peptide and proteins in a 96-well plate using a VERSAmax microplate reader (Molecular Devices). Binding curves were fitted using the GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software).
Additional information
Accession codes: The coordinates for the PBD of the PLK1-1010pT peptide complex have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession code 4O9W.
How to cite this article: Kim, J. H. et al. The condensin component NCAPG2 regulates microtubule–kinetochore attachment through recruitment of Polo-like kinase 1 to kinetochores. Nat. Commun. 5:4588 doi: 10.1038/ncomms5588 (2014).
Accession codes
References
Thadani, R., Uhlmann, F. & Heeger, S. Condensin, chromatin crossbarring and chromosome condensation. Curr. Biol. 22, R1012–R1021 (2012).
Hirano, T. Condensins: universal organizers of chromosomes with diverse functions. Genes Dev. 26, 1659–1678 (2012).
Wood, A. J., Severson, A. F. & Meyer, B. J. Condensin and cohesin complexity: the expanding repertoire of functions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 391–404 (2010).
Green, L. C. et al. Contrasting roles of condensin I and condensin II in mitotic chromosome formation. J. Cell Sci. 125, 1591–1604 (2012).
Neuwald, A. F. & Hirano, T. HEAT repeats associated with condensins, cohesins, and other complexes involved in chromosome-related functions. Genome Res. 10, 1445–1452 (2000).
Wood, J. L., Liang, Y., Li, K. & Chen, J. Microcephalin/MCPH1 associates with the Condensin II complex to function in homologous recombination repair. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 29586–29592 (2008).
Ono, T., Yamashita, D. & Hirano, T. Condensin II initiates sister chromatid resolution during S phase. J. Cell Biol. 200, 429–441 (2013).
Floyd, S. R. et al. The bromodomain protein Brd4 insulates chromatin from DNA damage signalling. Nature 498, 246–250 (2013).
Samoshkin, A. et al. Human condensin function is essential for centromeric chromatin assembly and proper sister kinetochore orientation. PLoS ONE 4, e6831 (2009).
Liu, W. et al. PHF8 mediates histone H4 lysine 20 demethylation events involved in cell cycle progression. Nature 466, 508–512 (2010).
Csankovszki, G. et al. Three distinct condensin complexes control C. elegans chromosome dynamics. Curr. Biol. 19, 9–19 (2009).
Hagstrom, K. A., Holmes, V. F., Cozzarelli, N. R. & Meyer, B. J. C. elegans condensin promotes mitotic chromosome architecture, centromere organization, and sister chromatid segregation during mitosis and meiosis. Genes Dev. 16, 729–742 (2002).
Ono, T., Fang, Y., Spector, D. L. & Hirano, T. Spatial and temporal regulation of Condensins I and II in mitotic chromosome assembly in human cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 3296–3308 (2004).
Stear, J. H. & Roth, M. B. Characterization of HCP-6, a C. elegans protein required to prevent chromosome twisting and merotelic attachment. Genes Dev. 16, 1498–1508 (2002).
Smith, E. D. et al. More than blood, a novel gene required for mammalian postimplantation development. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 1168–1173 (2004).
Xu, Y., Leung, C. G., Lee, D. C., Kennedy, B. K. & Crispino, J. D. MTB, the murine homolog of condensin II subunit CAP-G2, represses transcription and promotes erythroid cell differentiation. Leukemia 20, 1261–1269 (2006).
Foley, E. A. & Kapoor, T. M. Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at the kinetochore. Nat. Rev. Mol Cell. Biol. 14, 25–37 (2013).
Lens, S. M., Voest, E. E. & Medema, R. H. Shared and separate functions of polo-like kinases and aurora kinases in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 10, 825–841 (2010).
Liu, D., Davydenko, O. & Lampson, M. A. Polo-like kinase-1 regulates kinetochore-microtubule dynamics and spindle checkpoint silencing. J. Cell Biol. 198, 491–499 (2012).
Barr, F. A., Sillje, H. H. & Nigg, E. A. Polo-like kinases and the orchestration of cell division. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 429–440 (2004).
Carmena, M. et al. The chromosomal passenger complex activates Polo kinase at centromeres. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001250 (2012).
Lee, K. S., Grenfell, T. Z., Yarm, F. R. & Erikson, R. L. Mutation of the polo-box disrupts localization and mitotic functions of the mammalian polo kinase Plk. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 9301–9306 (1998).
Suijkerbuijk, S. J., Vleugel, M., Teixeira, A. & Kops, G. J. Integration of kinase and phosphatase activities by BUBR1 ensures formation of stable kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Dev. Cell 23, 745–755 (2012).
Lampson, M. A. & Kapoor, T. M. The human mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1 regulates chromosome-spindle attachments. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 93–98 (2005).
Elowe, S., Hummer, S., Uldschmid, A., Li, X. & Nigg, E. A. Tension-sensitive Plk1 phosphorylation on BubR1 regulates the stability of kinetochore microtubule interactions. Genes Dev. 21, 2205–2219 (2007).
Matsumura, S., Toyoshima, F. & Nishida, E. Polo-like kinase 1 facilitates chromosome alignment during prometaphase through BubR1. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 15217–15227 (2007).
Ono, T. et al. Differential contributions of condensin I and condensin II to mitotic chromosome architecture in vertebrate cells. Cell 115, 109–121 (2003).
Cleveland, D. W., Mao, Y. & Sullivan, K. F. Centromeres and kinetochores: from epigenetics to mitotic checkpoint signaling. Cell 112, 407–421 (2003).
Cheeseman, I. M. & Desai, A. Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 33–46 (2008).
Mayer, T. U. et al. Small molecule inhibitor of mitotic spindle bipolarity identified in a phenotype-based screen. Science 286, 971–974 (1999).
Yao, X., Abrieu, A., Zheng, Y., Sullivan, K. F. & Cleveland, D. W. CENP-E forms a link between attachment of spindle microtubules to kinetochores and the mitotic checkpoint. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 484–491 (2000).
Nishi, Y., Rogers, E., Robertson, S. M. & Lin, R. Polo kinases regulate C. elegans embryonic polarity via binding to DYRK2-primed MEX-5 and MEX-6. Development 135, 687–697 (2008).
Ji, J.-H. & Jang, Y.-J. Functional independency between catalytic activity and subcellular targeting of Polo-like kinase-1: Phenotypes of ectopic overexpression of various mutants. Cell Cycle 7, 1597–1603 (2008).
Elia, A. E., Cantley, L. C. & Yaffe, M. B. Proteomic screen finds pSer/pThr-binding domain localizing Plk1 to mitotic substrates. Science 299, 1228–1231 (2003).
Elia, A. E. H. et al. The molecular basis for phosphodependent substrate targeting and regulation of Plks by the Polo-box domain. Cell 115, 83–95 (2003).
Cheng, K. Y., Lowe, E. D., Sinclair, J., Nigg, E. A. & Johnson, L. N. The crystal structure of the human polo-like kinase-1 polo box domain and its phospho-peptide complex. EMBO J. 22, 5757–5768 (2003).
Yun, S. M. et al. Structural and functional analyses of minimal phosphopeptides targeting the polo-box domain of polo-like kinase 1. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 876–882 (2009).
Garcia-Alvarez, B., de Carcer, G., Ibanez, S., Bragado-Nilsson, E. & Montoya, G. Molecular and structural basis of polo-like kinase 1 substrate recognition: Implications in centrosomal localization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3107–3112 (2007).
Sumara, I. et al. Roles of polo-like kinase 1 in the assembly of functional mitotic spindles. Curr. Biol. 14, 1712–1722 (2004).
Kang, Y. H. et al. Self-regulated Plk1 recruitment to kinetochores by the Plk1-PBIP1 interaction is critical for proper chromosome segregation. Mol. Cell 24, 409–422 (2006).
Nishino, M. et al. NudC is required for Plk1 targeting to the kinetochore and chromosome congression. Curr. Biol. 16, 1414–1421 (2006).
Qi, W., Tang, Z. & Yu, H. Phosphorylation- and Polo-box–dependent binding of Plk1 to Bub1 is required for the kinetochore localization of Plk1. Mol. Biol. Cell 17, 3705–3716 (2006).
Bembenek, J. N., Verbrugghe, Koen J. C., Khanikar, J., Csankovszki, G. & Chan, Raymond C. Condensin and the spindle midzone prevent cytokinesis failure induced by chromatin bridges in C. elegans embryos. Curr. Biol. 23, 937–946 (2013).
Abe, S. et al. The initial phase of chromosome condensation requires Cdk1-mediated phosphorylation of the CAP-D3 subunit of condensin II. Genes Dev. 25, 863–874 (2011).
Sunkel, C. E. & Glover, D. M. polo, a mitotic mutant of Drosophila displaying abnormal spindle poles. J. Cell Sci. 89, (Pt 1): 25–38 (1988).
Goto, H. et al. Complex formation of Plk1 and INCENP required for metaphase-anaphase transition. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 180–187 (2006).
Beck, J. et al. Ubiquitylation-dependent localization of PLK1 in mitosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 430–439 (2013).
Aumais, J. P. et al. Role for NudC, a dynein-associated nuclear movement protein, in mitosis and cytokinesis. J. Cell Sci. 116, 1991–2003 (2003).
Liu, F. et al. Identification of high affinity polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) polo-box domain binding peptides using oxime-based diversification. ACS Chem. Biol. 7, 805–810 (2012).
Liu, F. et al. Peptoid-Peptide hybrid ligands targeting the polo box domain of polo-like kinase 1. Chembiochem 13, 1291–1296 (2012).
Liu, F. et al. Serendipitous alkylation of a Plk1 ligand uncovers a new binding channel. Nat. Chem. Biol. 7, 595–601 (2011).
Brenner, S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77, 71–94 (1974).
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. inMethods in Enzymology, Macromolecular Crystallograpy Vol. 276, eds Carter, J. C.W., Sweet R.M. 307–326Academic Press (1997).
McCoy, A. J. Solving structures of protein complexes by molecular QJ;replacement with Phaser. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 63, 32–41 (2007).
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 (2010).
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
Acknowledgements
We thank Tae-Sik Kim and Mi Ae Kim for providing technical support for this study. We thank Lee Ann Chastain for editorial assistance. This work was supported by a National Cancer Center research grant (NCC-1110080) to K.-T.K. and by the Mid-Career Researcher Program (NRF-2011-0029294) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) and funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning to B.I.L.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.H.K., J.S., B.I.L. and K.-T.K. conceived and designed the experiments; J.H.K., J.S., M.-J.J., Y.J., S.M.B., Y.-J.J., E.K.Y., Y.H.K., C.L., B.I.L. and K.-T.K. analysed the data; J.H.K., J.S., M.-J.J., Y.J., S.M.B., Y.-J.J., E.-K.Y., B.I.L., S.-J.L., K.G.K. and K.-T.K. performed the experiments; J.H.K., J.S., Y.H.K., B.I.L. and K.-T.K. wrote the paper. All authors have read and approved the manuscript for publication.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figures 1-6 (PDF 754 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, J., Shim, J., Ji, MJ. et al. The condensin component NCAPG2 regulates microtubule–kinetochore attachment through recruitment of Polo-like kinase 1 to kinetochores. Nat Commun 5, 4588 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5588
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5588
This article is cited by
-
NCAPG2 promotes prostate cancer malignancy and stemness via STAT3/c-MYC signaling
Journal of Translational Medicine (2024)
-
NCAPG2 facilitates glioblastoma cells’ malignancy and xenograft tumor growth via HBO1 activation by phosphorylation
Cell and Tissue Research (2021)
-
A NCAPG2-Derived Phosphopeptide Selectively Binds to the Polo-Box Domain of PLK1 and Inhibits Cancer Cell Proliferation
International Journal of Peptide Research and Therapeutics (2019)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.