Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Response of snow-dependent hydrologic extremes to continued global warming

Abstract

Snow accumulation is critical for water availability in the Northern Hemisphere1,2, raising concern that global warming could have important impacts on natural and human systems in snow-dependent regions1,3. Although regional hydrologic changes have been observed (for example, refs 1, 3, 4, 5), the time of emergence of extreme changes in snow accumulation and melt remains a key unknown for assessing climate-change impacts3,6,7. We find that the CMIP5 global climate model ensemble exhibits an imminent shift towards low snow years in the Northern Hemisphere, with areas of western North America, northeastern Europe and the Greater Himalaya showing the strongest emergence during the near-term decades and at 2 °C global warming. The occurrence of extremely low snow years becomes widespread by the late twenty-first century, as do the occurrences of extremely high early-season snowmelt and runoff (implying increasing flood risk), and extremely low late-season snowmelt and runoff (implying increasing water stress). Our results suggest that many snow-dependent regions of the Northern Hemisphere are likely to experience increasing stress from low snow years within the next three decades, and from extreme changes in snow-dominated water resources if global warming exceeds 2 °C above the pre-industrial baseline.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Comparison of model realizations in the baseline and late-twenty-first-century periods.
Figure 2: Emergence of low and extremely low snow years in the twenty-first century.
Figure 3: Emergence of extreme precipitation, melt and runoff years in the twenty-first century.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barnett, T. P., Adam, J. C. & Lettenmaier, D. P. Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions. Nature 438, 303–309 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Viviroli, D., Durr, H. H., Messerli, B., Meybeck, M. & Weingartner, R. Mountains of the world, water towers for humanity: Typology, mapping, and global significance. Wat. Resour. Res. 43, 1–13 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stewart, I. T. Changes in snowpack and snowmelt runoff for key mountain regions. Hydrol. Process. 23, 78–94 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barnett, T. P. et al. Human-induced changes in the hydrology of the western United States. Science 319, 1080–1083 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Choi, G., Robinson, D. A. & Kang, S. Changing Northern Hemisphere snow seasons. J. Clim. 23, 5305–5310 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gardelle, J., Berthier, E. & Arnaud, Y. Slight mass gain of Karakoram glaciers in the early twenty-first century. Nature Geosci. 5, 322–325 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mote, P. W., Hamlet, A. F., Clark, M. P. & Lettenmaier, D. P. Declining mountain snowpack in western north America. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 86, 39–49 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kurz, W. A. et al. Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change. Nature 452, 987–990 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Westerling, A. L., Hidalgo, H. G., Cayan, D. R. & Swetnam, T. W. Warming and earlier spring increase western US forest wildfire activity. Science 313, 940–943 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kelly, A. E. & Goulden, M. L. Rapid shifts in plant distribution with recent climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 11823–11826 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gornall, J. et al. Implications of climate change for agricultural productivity in the early twenty-first century. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 2973–2989 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rood, S. B. et al. Declining summer flows of Rocky Mountain rivers: Changing seasonal hydrology and probable impacts on floodplain forests. J. Hydrol. 349, 397–410 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schroter, D. et al. Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science 310, 1333–1337 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cayan, D. R. Interannual climate variability and snowpack in the western United States. J. Clim. 9, 928–948 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Scherrer, S. C. & Appenzeller, C. Swiss Alpine snow pack variability: Major patterns and links to local climate and large-scale flow. Clim. Res. 32, 187–199 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J. & Meehl, G. A. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 485–498 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Moss, R. H. et al. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463, 747–756 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rogelj, J., Meinshausen, M. & Knutti, R. Global warming under old and new scenarios using IPCC climate sensitivity range estimates. Nature Clim. Change 2, 248–253 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kapnick, S. & Hall, A. Causes of recent changes in western North American snowpack. Clim. Dyn. 38, 1885–1899 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bohr, G. S. & Aguado, E. Use of April 1 SWE measurements as estimates of peak seasonal snowpack and total cold-season precipitation. Wat. Resour. Res. 37, 51–60 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Meehl, G. A. in IPCC Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (eds Solomon, S. et al.) Ch. 10 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Deser, C., Tomas, R., Alexander, M. & Lawrence, D. The seasonal atmospheric response to projected Arctic sea ice loss in the late twenty-first century. J. Clim. 23, 333–351 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yin, J. H. A consistent poleward shift of the storm tracks in simulations of 21st century climate. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L18701 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bookhagen, B. & Burbank, D. W. Toward a complete Himalayan hydrological budget: Spatiotemporal distribution of snowmelt and rainfall and their impact on river discharge. J. Geophys. Res. 115, F03019 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ashfaq, M., Bowling, L. C., Cherkauer, K., Pal, J. S. & Diffenbaugh, N. S. Influence of climate model biases and daily-scale temperature and precipitation events on hydrological impacts assessment: A case study of the United States. J. Geophys. Res. 115, D14116 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Masson, D. & Knutti, R. Climate model genealogy. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L08703 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Boggs, C. L. & Inouye, D. W. A single climate driver has direct and indirect effects on insect population dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 15, 502–508 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Diffenbaugh, N. S. & Scherer, M. Observational and model evidence of global emergence of permanent, unprecedented heat in the 20th and 21st centuries. Clim. Change 107, 615–624 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Armstrong, R. L., Brodzik, M. J., Knowles, K. & Savoie, M. Global Monthly EASE-Grid Snow Water Equivalent Climatology (National Snow and Ice Data Center, Digital Media, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Giorgi, F. & Bi, X. Updated regional precipitation and temperature changes for the 21st century from ensembles of recent AOGCM simulations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L21715 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Support for data storage and analysis was provided by the Center for Computational Earth and Environmental Sciences in the School of Earth Sciences at Stanford University. We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for CMIP, and we thank the climate modelling groups (listed in Supplementary Table S1) for producing and making available their model output. For CMIP the US Department of Energy’s Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provides coordinating support and led development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals. We thank the National Snow and Ice Data Center for providing the SWE data. Our work was supported by NSF award 0955283 and NIH award 1R01AI090159-01 to N.S.D., and ORNL LDRD 32112413 and DOE award ERKP777 to M.A.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

N.S.D. designed the climate model analysis, performed the climate model analysis and wrote the paper. M.S. designed the climate model analysis and performed the climate model analysis. M.A. designed the climate model analysis and wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noah S. Diffenbaugh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 9339 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diffenbaugh, N., Scherer, M. & Ashfaq, M. Response of snow-dependent hydrologic extremes to continued global warming. Nature Clim Change 3, 379–384 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1732

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1732

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing