You ask in an Editorial whether the Beijing Genomics Institute's strategy of tackling a huge research project by using a large team of new graduates could eventually displace a PhD degree as a model for the training and development of future scientists (Nature 464, 7; 2010). I don't believe so.

Although the institute's army of sequencers can produce impressive amounts of data, their individual capabilities are primarily technical and are limited to the field of genomics. They are unlikely to move on to conceptually more advanced projects, to publish their own results in world-class journals or to defend them at conferences.

Routine sequencing work cannot measure up to the standards of advanced education or creativity demanded by a formal PhD programme. The graduates at the Beijing Genomics Institute, like workers in any other industrial or academic setting, are mainly functioning as labourers to operate instruments and collect data.

China's higher-education system is expanding rapidly and the job market for new graduates is becoming increasingly tough. Central government is subsidizing academic institutions that hire them in an attempt to rectify the situation. The Beijing Genomics Institute's venture is therefore a response to political and social demand, rather than a genuine scheme to train future scientists. Most of the students will end up in non-academic positions where they are likely to be paid more.

A scientist has to be able to use the kind of logic and creativity that can really only be acquired through scientific education and training. To produce more creative researchers, China will need educational reforms that make doctorates seem more attractive and worthwhile to good graduates.