Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Foxp3 occupancy and regulation of key target genes during T-cell stimulation

Nature volume 445, pages 931–935 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

Foxp3+CD4+CD25+ regulatory T (Treg) cells are essential for the prevention of autoimmunity1,2. Treg cells have an attenuated cytokine response to T-cell receptor stimulation, and can suppress the proliferation and effector function of neighbouring T cells3,4. The forkhead transcription factor Foxp3 (forkhead box P3) is selectively expressed in Treg cells, is required for Treg development and function, and is sufficient to induce a Treg phenotype in conventional CD4+CD25- T cells5,6,7,8. Mutations in Foxp3 cause severe, multi-organ autoimmunity in both human and mouse9,10,11. FOXP3 can cooperate in a DNA-binding complex with NFAT (nuclear factor of activated T cells) to regulate the transcription of several known target genes12. However, the global set of genes regulated directly by Foxp3 is not known and consequently, how this transcription factor controls the gene expression programme for Treg function is not understood. Here we identify Foxp3 target genes and report that many of these are key modulators of T-cell activation and function. Remarkably, the predominant, although not exclusive, effect of Foxp3 occupancy is to suppress the activation of target genes on T-cell stimulation. Foxp3 suppression of its targets appears to be crucial for the normal function of Treg cells, because overactive variants of some target genes are known to be associated with autoimmune disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Strategy to identify direct Foxp3 transcriptional effects.
Figure 2: Direct Foxp3 targets include key modulators of T-cell function.
Figure 3: Foxp3 directly suppresses the activation of target genes.
Figure 4: Core direct regulatory effects of Foxp3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sakaguchi, S., Sakaguchi, N., Asano, M., Itoh, M. & Toda, M. Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by activated T cells expressing IL-2 receptor alpha-chains (CD25). Breakdown of a single mechanism of self-tolerance causes various autoimmune diseases. J. Immunol. 155, 1151–1164 (1995)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Baecher-Allan, C. & Hafler, D. A. Human regulatory T cells and their role in autoimmune disease. Immunol. Rev. 212, 203–216 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shevach, E. M. CD4+ CD25+ suppressor T cells: more questions than answers. Nature Rev. Immunol. 2, 389–400 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. von Boehmer, H. Mechanisms of suppression by suppressor T cells. Nature Immunol. 6, 338–344 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hori, S., Nomura, T. & Sakaguchi, S. Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3. Science 299, 1057–1061 (2003)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fontenot, J. D., Gavin, M. A. & Rudensky, A. Y. Foxp3 programs the development and function of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Nature Immunol. 4, 330–336 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Khattri, R. et al. An essential role for Scurfin in CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells. Nature Immunol. 4, 337–342 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fontenot, J. D. et al. Regulatory T cell lineage specification by the forkhead transcription factor foxp3. Immunity 22, 329–341 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brunkow, M. E. et al. Disruption of a new forkhead/winged-helix protein, scurfin, results in the fatal lymphoproliferative disorder of the scurfy mouse. Nature Genet. 27, 68–73 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bennett, C. L. et al. The immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome (IPEX) is caused by mutations of FOXP3. Nature Genet. 27, 20–21 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wildin, R. S. et al. X-linked neonatal diabetes mellitus, enteropathy and endocrinopathy syndrome is the human equivalent of mouse scurfy. Nature Genet. 27, 18–20 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu, Y. et al. FOXP3 controls regulatory T cell function through cooperation with NFAT. Cell 126, 375–387 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schubert, L. A., Jeffery, E., Zhang, Y., Ramsdell, F. & Ziegler, S. F. Scurfin (FOXP3) acts as a repressor of transcription and regulates T cell activation. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 37672–37679 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Boyer, L. A. et al. Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature 441, 349–353 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, C., Rowell, E. A., Thomas, R. M., Hancock, W. W. & Wells, A. D. Transcriptional regulation by Foxp3 is associated with direct promoter occupancy and modulation of histone acetylation. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 36828–36834 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cobb, B. S. et al. A role for Dicer in immune regulation. J. Exp. Med. 203, 2519–2527 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McHugh, R. S. et al. CD4+CD25+ immunoregulatory T cells: gene expression analysis reveals a functional role for the glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor. Immunity 16, 311–323 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bruder, D. et al. Neuropilin-1: a surface marker of regulatory T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 34, 623–630 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Iellem, A. et al. Unique chemotactic response profile and specific expression of chemokine receptors CCR4 and CCR8 by CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. J. Exp. Med. 194, 847–853 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Harbison, C. T. et al. Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 431, 99–104 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Klein, L., Khazaie, K. & von Boehmer, H. In vivo dynamics of antigen-specific regulatory T cells not predicted from behavior in vitro. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8886–8892 (2003)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jordan, M. S. et al. Thymic selection of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells induced by an agonist self-peptide. Nature Immunol. 2, 301–306 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kretschmer, K. et al. Inducing and expanding regulatory T cell populations by foreign antigen. Nature Immunol. 6, 1219–1227 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stanford, W. L. et al. Altered proliferative response by T lymphocytes of Ly-6A (Sca-1) null mice. J. Exp. Med. 186, 705–717 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Myers, L. M. & Vella, A. T. Interfacing T-cell effector and regulatory function through CD137 (4–1BB) co-stimulation. Trends Immunol. 26, 440–446 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bottini, N. et al. A functional variant of lymphoid tyrosine phosphatase is associated with type I diabetes. Nature Genet. 36, 337–338 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu, J. et al. Identification of substrates of human protein-tyrosine phosphatase PTPN22. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 11002–11010 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bottini, N., Vang, T., Cucca, F. & Mustelin, T. Role of PTPN22 in type 1 diabetes and other autoimmune diseases. Semin. Immunol. 18, 207–213 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Vang, T. et al. Autoimmune-associated lymphoid tyrosine phosphatase is a gain-of-function variant. Nature Genet. 37, 1317–1319 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Young, von Boehmer and Fraenkel laboratories, as well as R. Jaenisch and D. K. Gifford, for discussions and critical review of the manuscript, especially T. I. Lee, J. Zeitlinger and D. T. Odom. We also thank Biology and Research Computing (BaRC), especially T. Dicesare for graphic assistance, as well as E. Herbolsheimer for computational and technical support. K.K. was supported in part by a fellowship grant from the German Research Foundation. This work was supported in part by a donation from E. Radutzky, and by the Whitaker Foundation (E.F.) and the NIH (H.v.B. and R.A.Y.). All microarray data from this study are available from ArrayExpress at the EBI under the accession code E-TABM-154

Author Contributions R.A.Y. and H.v.B. contributed both as senior and corresponding authors.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Alexander Marson and Karsten Kretschmer: These authors contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, 9 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA,

    Alexander Marson, Garrett M. Frampton, Elizabeth S. Jacobsen, Stuart S. Levine & Richard A. Young

  2. Department of Biology,,

    Alexander Marson, Garrett M. Frampton & Richard A. Young

  3. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science,,

    Kenzie D. MacIsaac

  4. Biological Engineering Division,,

    Ernest Fraenkel

  5. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA,

    Ernest Fraenkel

  6. Department of Cancer Immunology and AIDS, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA,

    Karsten Kretschmer, Julia K. Polansky & Harald von Boehmer

  7. Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA,

    Karsten Kretschmer & Harald von Boehmer

Authors
  1. Alexander Marson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karsten Kretschmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Garrett M. Frampton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elizabeth S. Jacobsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Julia K. Polansky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kenzie D. MacIsaac
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Stuart S. Levine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ernest Fraenkel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Harald von Boehmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Richard A. Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Harald von Boehmer or Richard A. Young.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Competing interests: R.A.Y. is a consultant to Agilent Technologies.

Supplementary information

TITLE

This file contains the Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Discussion, Supplementary Notes, Supplementary Figures S1–S6 with legends and additional references. (PDF 2123 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

This file contains Supplementary Table S1 which shows Foxp3 bound regions in stimulated and unstimulated hybridoma cells. The genomic regions that are bound by Foxp3, which are identified at false discovery rates of 5% and 10% in stimulated and unstimulated hybridoma cells, are listed. (XLS 182 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

This file contains Supplementary Table S2 which shows Foxp3 bound genes in stimulated and unstimulated hybridoma cells. Genes with Foxp3 bound regions within a 10kb window (8kb upstream to 2kb downstream) from a well-annotated TSS in stimulated and unstimulated hybridoma cells are listed. (XLS 273 kb)

Supplementary Table 3

This file contains Supplementary Table S3 which shows selected Foxp3 target genes with roles in T cell biology. Many Foxp3 target genes known to play roles in T cell biology are listed and categorized, including miRNAs that are differentially expressed between Treg cells and conventional T cells. (DOC 67 kb)

Supplementary Table 4

This file contains Supplementary Table S4 which shows E2F4 bound regions and genes in unstimulated hybridoma cells. The genomic regions that are bound by E2F4, which are identified at a false discovery rate of 5% in unstimulated hybridoma cells, are listed. The genes with E2F4 bound regions within a 1kb window (800bp upstream to 200bp downstream) around a well-annotated TSS in unstimulated hybridoma cells are listed. This data was generated on the single slide promoter proximal arrays. (XLS 70 kb)

Supplementary Table 5

This file contains Supplementary Table S5 which shows DNA motif results. The log2-odds ratio PSSM of the DNA motif that was discovered by the THEME algorithm within Foxp3 bound regions is provided. The counts of total and conserved Foxp3 and Nfat DNA motifs in Foxp3 bound regions compared to all arrayed regions are provided, as is information about the enrichment of neighbouring forkhead and Nfat motifs in Foxp3 bound regions. (XLS 10 kb)

Supplementary Table 6

This file contains Supplementary Table S6 which shows hybridoma expression dataset. The complete expression dataset from the hybridoma cells is provided in quantile normalized and unnormalized forms. (XLS 10961 kb)

Supplementary Table 7

This file contains Supplementary Table S7 which shows Foxp3 dependant differentially expressed genes in stimulated hybridoma cells. In part (a) expression data for the genes that were determined to be differentially expressed between stimulated Foxp3- and Foxp3+ hybridoma cells are provided. These genes were selected according to methods described in the supplementary section, Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes. This data is displayed in Figure 3a. In part (b) expression data for the probesets that were determined to be differentially expressed between stimulated Foxp3- and Foxp3+ hybridoma cells are provided. (XLS 101 kb)

Supplementary Table 8

This file contains Supplementary Table S8 which shows Foxp3 dependant differentially expressed genes in unstimulated hybridoma cells. In part (a) Expression data for the genes that were determined to be differentially expressed between unstimulated Foxp3- and Foxp3+ hybridoma cells are provided. These genes were selected according to methods described in the supplementary section, Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes. In part (b) expression data for the probesets that were determined to be differentially expressed between unstimulated Foxp3- and Foxp3+ hybridoma cells are provided. (XLS 41 kb)

Supplementary Table 9

This file contains Supplementary Table S9 which shows Ex vivo expression dataset. The complete expression dataset from the ex vivo cells is provided in quantile normalized and unnormalized forms. (XLS 10949 kb)

Supplementary Table 10

This file contains Supplementary Table S10 which shows genes with consistent Foxp3 dependant differential expression in ex vivo and hybridoma cells. Expression data for the genes with the greatest Foxp3 dependent expression in both ex vivo and hybridoma cells are provided. These genes were selected according to methods described in the supplementary section, Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes. (XLS 67 kb)

Supplementary Table 11

This file contains SupplementaryTable S11 which shows eal-time RT-PCR dataset. The complete dataset from quantitative PCR experiments is provided. (XLS 31 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marson, A., Kretschmer, K., Frampton, G. et al. Foxp3 occupancy and regulation of key target genes during T-cell stimulation. Nature 445, 931–935 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05478

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05478

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing