Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letter
Nature 435, 328-331 (19 May 2005) | doi:10.1038/nature03622; Received 19 January 2005; Accepted 7 April 2005
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Novel Approaches to Protecting Maize from Insect Damage
The Seeker is looking for novel approaches to protecting maize from insect damage. This Challenge re...
-
Methods to Analyze Consumer Emotions
The Seeker is looking for methods to analyze consumer emotions. This Challenge requires only a writ...
nature jobs
Professor of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Karolinska Institute
- Stockholm Sweden
Assistant / Associate / Full Professor
- Northeastern University
- Boston, MA
Real-time forecasts of tomorrow's earthquakes in California
Matthew C. Gerstenberger1, Stefan Wiemer2, Lucile M. Jones1 & Paul A. Reasenberg3
- US Geological Survey, 525 S. Wilson Ave, Pasadena, California 91106, USA
- ETH Zürich, Institute of Geophysics, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
- US Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA
Correspondence to: Matthew C. Gerstenberger1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.C.G. (Email: mattg@usgs.gov).
Abstract
Despite a lack of reliable deterministic earthquake precursors, seismologists have significant predictive information about earthquake activity from an increasingly accurate understanding of the clustering properties of earthquakes1, 2, 3, 4. In the past 15 years, time-dependent earthquake probabilities based on a generic short-term clustering model have been made publicly available in near-real time during major earthquake sequences. These forecasts describe the probability and number of events that are, on average, likely to occur following a mainshock of a given magnitude, but are not tailored to the particular sequence at hand and contain no information about the likely locations of the aftershocks. Our model builds upon the basic principles of this generic forecast model in two ways: it recasts the forecast in terms of the probability of strong ground shaking, and it combines an existing time-independent earthquake occurrence model based on fault data and historical earthquakes5 with increasingly complex models describing the local time-dependent earthquake clustering1, 2. The result is a time-dependent map showing the probability of strong shaking anywhere in California within the next 24 hours. The seismic hazard modelling approach we describe provides a better understanding of time-dependent earthquake hazard, and increases its usefulness for the public, emergency planners and the media.
- US Geological Survey, 525 S. Wilson Ave, Pasadena, California 91106, USA
- ETH Zürich, Institute of Geophysics, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
- US Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA
Correspondence to: Matthew C. Gerstenberger1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.C.G. (Email: mattg@usgs.gov).
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
Earth science A different kind of foreshockNature News and Views (24 Mar 2005)
Earthquakes Future shock in CaliforniaNature News and Views (19 May 2005)
See all 17 matches for News And ViewsRESEARCH
Foreshock sequences and short-term earthquake predictability on East Pacific Rise transform faultsNature Article (24 Mar 2005)
Stress changes from the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake and increased hazard in the Sichuan basinNature Letters to Editor (24 Jul 2008)
See all 50 matches for Research
