Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Consumer versus resource control of species diversity and ecosystem functioning

Abstract

A key question in ecology is which factors control species diversity in a community1,2,3. Two largely separate groups of ecologists have emphasized the importance of productivity or resource supply, and consumers or physical disturbance, respectively. These variables show unimodal relationships with diversity when manipulated in isolation4,5,6,7,8. Recent multivariate models9,10, however, predict that these factors interact, such that the disturbance–diversity relationship depends on productivity, and vice versa. We tested these models in marine food webs, using field manipulations of nutrient resources and consumer pressure on rocky shores of contrasting productivity. Here we show that the effects of consumers and nutrients on diversity consistently depend on each other, and that the direction of their effects and peak diversity shift between sites of low and high productivity. Factorial meta-analysis of published experiments confirms these results across widely varying aquatic communities. Furthermore, our experiments demonstrate that these patterns extend to important ecosystem functions such as carbon storage and nitrogen retention. This suggests that human impacts on nutrient supply11 and food-web structure12,13 have strong and interdependent effects on species diversity and ecosystem functioning, and must therefore be managed together.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Consumer versus resource control of species diversity.
Figure 2: Factorial field experiments.
Figure 3: Factorial meta-analysis of published field experiments.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hutchinson, G. E. Homage to Santa Rosalia, or why are there so many kinds of animals. Am. Nat. 93, 145–159 (1959)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tilman, D. Causes, consequences and ethics of biodiversity. Nature 405, 208–211 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sommer, U. & Worm, B. (eds) Competition and Coexistence (Springer, Berlin, 2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Connell, J. H. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199, 1302–1310 (1978)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tilman, D. Resource Competition and Community Structure (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Flöder, S. & Sommer, U. Diversity in planktonic communities: an experimental test of the intermediate disturbance hypothesis. Limnol. Oceanogr. 44, 1114–1119 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Buckling, A., Kassen, R., Bell, G. & Rainey, P. B. Disturbance and diversity in experimental microcosms. Nature 408, 961–964 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kassen, R., Buckling, A., Bell, G. & Rainey, P. B. Diversity peaks at intermediate productivity in laboratory microcosms. Nature 406, 508–512 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Huston, M. A. Biological Diversity (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kondoh, M. Unifying the relationships of species richness to productivity and disturbance. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 269–271 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vitousek, P. M. et al. Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecol. Appl. 7, 737–750 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Dalsgaard, J., Froese, R. & Torres, F. Jr Fishing down marine food webs. Science 279, 860–863 (1998)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jackson, J. B. C. et al. Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293, 629–638 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tilman, D. Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75, 2–16 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mann, K. H. Seaweeds: their productivity and strategy for growth. Science 182, 975–981 (1973)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nielsen, K. J. Bottom-up and top-down forces in tide pools: test of a food chain model in an intertidal community. Ecol. Monogr. 71, 187–217 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Menge, B. A. & Sutherland, J. P. Community regulation: variation in disturbance, competition, and predation in relation to environmental stress and recruitment. Am. Nat. 130, 730–757 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sorokin, Y. I. Coral Reef Ecology (Springer, Berlin, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Worm, B., Lotze, H. K. & Sommer, U. Coastal food web structure, carbon storage and nitrogen retention regulated by consumer pressure and nutrient loading. Limnol. Oceanogr. 45, 339–349 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chapin, F. S. III et al. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405, 234–242 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gurevitch, J., Morrison, J. A. & Hedges, L. V. The interaction between competition and predation: a meta-analysis of field experiments. Am. Nat. 155, 435–453 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Terborgh, J. et al. Ecological meltdown in predator-free forest fragments. Science 294, 1923–1925 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Watling, L. & Norse, E. A. Disturbance of the seabed by mobile fishing gear: a comparison to forest clearcutting. Conserv. Biol. 12, 1180–1197 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lotze, H. K., Worm, B. & Sommer, U. Strong bottom-up and top-down control of early life stages of macroalgae. Limnol. Oceanogr. 46, 749–757 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Worm, B., Reusch, T. B. H. & Lotze, H. K. In situ nutrient enrichment: methods for marine benthic ecology. Internat. Rev. Hydrobiol. 85, 359–375 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Stirling, G. & Wilsey, B. Empirical relationships between species richness, evenness, and proportional diversity. Am. Nat. 158, 286–299 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hillebrand, H., Worm, B. & Lotze, H. K. Marine microbenthic community structure regulated by nitrogen loading and herbivore pressure. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 204, 27–38 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hillebrand, H. & Kahlert, M. Effect of grazing and nutrient supply on periphyton biomass and nutrient stoichiometry in habitats of different productivity. Limnol. Oceanogr. 46, 1881–1898 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gough, L. & Grace, J. B. Herbivore effects on plant species density at varying productivity levels. Ecology 79, 1586–1594 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Proulx, M., Pick, F. R., Mazumder, A., Hamilton, P. B. & Lean, D. R. S. Experimental evidence for interactive impacts of human activities on lake algal species richness. Oikos 76, 191–195 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank L. Gough, R. Karez, D. Kehler, I. Milewski, R. A. Myers, R. T. Paine and T. B. H. Reusch for comments, and J. Gurevitch for statistical advice. This work was funded by the German Research Council (DFG) and the German Ministry of Science and Education.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boris Worm.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Worm, B., Lotze, H., Hillebrand, H. et al. Consumer versus resource control of species diversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature 417, 848–851 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00830

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00830

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing