Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letters to Nature
Nature 405, 60-63 (4 May 2000) | doi:10.1038/35011039; Received 16 October 1999; Accepted 31 March 2000
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Methods of Modeling Adaptation in Populations
The analysis of adaptation with a population is a frequently encountered computational modeling scen...
-
Direct Molecular Detection of Proteins and Nucleic Acids
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to protein and nucleic acid detection. This is an Id...
nature jobs
Gastroenterologist / Nutrition
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation
- Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Oleo Chemistry
- Praj Matrix - Praj Industries Ltd
- Pune, Maharashtra Pune-411021 India
Large differences in tropical aerosol forcing at the top of the atmosphere and Earth's surface
S. K. Satheesh & V. Ramanathan
- Center for Clouds, Chemistry, and Climate (C4), Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093 USA
Correspondence to: V. Ramanathan Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to V.R. (e-mail: Email: ram@fiji.ucsd.edu).
Abstract
The effect of radiative forcing by anthropogenic aerosols is one of the
largest sources of uncertainty in climate predictions1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
Direct observations of the forcing are therefore needed, particularly for
the poorly understood tropical aerosols. Here we present an observational
method for quantifying aerosol forcing to within
5 per cent. We use
calibrated satellite radiation measurements and five independent surface radiometers
to quantify the aerosol forcing simultaneously at the Earth's surface and
the top of the atmosphere over the tropical northern Indian Ocean. In winter,
this region is covered by anthropogenic aerosols of sulphate, nitrate, organics,
soot and fly ash from the south Asian continent7, 8. Accordingly,
mean clear-sky solar radiative heating for the winters of 1998 and 1999 decreased
at the ocean surface by 12 to 30 W m-2, but only
by 4 to 10 W m-2 at the top of the atmosphere.
This threefold difference (due largely to solar absorption by soot) and the
large magnitude of the observed surface forcing both imply that tropical aerosols
might slow down the hydrological cycle.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).

