Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letters to Nature
Nature 390, 65-67 (6 November 1997) | doi:10.1038/36324; Received 13 February 1997; Accepted 18 August 1997
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Direct Molecular Detection of Proteins and Nucleic Acids
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to protein and nucleic acid detection. This is an Id...
-
Methods of Modeling Adaptation in Populations
The analysis of adaptation with a population is a frequently encountered computational modeling scen...
nature jobs
Senior Faculty Positions
- Torrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies
- Port St. Lucie, FL
Gastrointestinal Pathologist
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Boston, MA
Organic carbon burial forcing of the carbon cycle from Himalayan erosion
Christian France-Lanord1,2 & Louis A. Derry2
- Centre de Recherches Pétrographiques et Géochimiques, CNRS, BP20 54501 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
- Cornell University, Department of Geological Sciences, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA
Correspondence to: Christian France-Lanord1,2 Correspondence should be addressed to C.F.-L. at CRPG-CNRS (e-mail: Email: cfl@crpg.cnrs-nancy.fr).
Abstract
Weathering and erosion can affect the long-term ocean–atmosphere budget of carbon dioxide both through the consumption of carbonic acid during silicate weathering and through changes in the weathering and burial rates of organic carbon1, 2, 3, 4. Recent attention has focused on increased silicate weathering of tectonically uplifted areas in the India–Asia collision zone as a possible cause for falling atmospheric CO2 levels in the Cenozoic era5, 6, 7. The chemistry of Neogene sediments from the main locus of sedimentary deposition for Himalayan detritus, the Bengal Fan, can be used to estimate the sinks of CO2 from silicate weathering and from the weathering and burial of organic carbon resulting from Himalayan uplift. Here we show that Neogene CO2 consumption from the net burial of organic carbon during Himalayan sediment deposition was 2–3 times that resulting from the weathering of Himalayan silicates. Thus the dominant effect of Neogene Himalayan erosion on the carbon cycle is an increase in the amount of organic carbon in the sedimentary reservoir, not an increase in silicate weathering fluxes.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).

