Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context

Nature volume 389, pages 596–599 (1997)Cite this article

Abstract

A degraded image of an object or face, which appearsmeaningless when seen for the first time, is easily recognizableafter viewing an undegraded version of the same image1. The neural mechanisms by whichthis form of rapid perceptual learning facilitates perception are notwell understood. Psychological theory suggests the involvementof systems for processing stimulus attributes, spatial attentionand feature binding2,as well as those involved in visual imagery3. Here we investigate where andhow this rapid perceptual learning is expressed in the human brain byusing functional neuroimaging to measure brain activity duringexposure to degraded images before and after exposure to thecorresponding undegraded versions (Fig. 1). Perceptuallearning of faces or objects enhanced the activity of inferiortemporal regions known to be involved in face and object recognitionrespectively46. In addition, both faceand object learning led to increased activity in medial and lateralparietal regions that have been implicated in attention7 and visual imagery8. We observed a strong couplingbetween the temporal face area and the medial parietal cortexwhen, and only when, faces were perceived. Thissuggests that perceptual learning involves direct interactions betweenareas involved in face recognition and those involved in spatialattention, feature binding and memoryrecall.

Binarized images of an object (top row) and face (bottom row) and their associated full grey-scale versions. The process of binarizing images involved transforming grey-scale levels into either black or white (two-tone) with values of either 0 or 1. Exposure to the associated grey-scale version took place 5 min before a second exposure to the two-tone version in study 1. In the pre- and post-learning scans, the subjects were told that they might see faces or objects, respectively, in the stimuli. A significant behavioural learning effect, operationally defined as the facilitation of performance by prior exposure to the grey-scale version, was evident for the object and face conditions. Behavioural data were collected for all conditions at the end of each individual scan. The mean number of resolved percepts pre- and post-exposure to the grey-scale images were 13 and 87% in the object, and 55 and 93% in face conditions, respectively. In study 2, the same sequence and stimuli were used but with pre- and post-exposure being interposed with non-related grey-scale images of objects and faces. Here the mean number of resolved percepts pre- and post-exposure to non-associated grey-scale images were 8 and 10% in the object, and 19 and 25% in the face conditions, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 2: Main effect of exposure.
Figure 3: Main effects of stimulus in study 1 for a, objects (Ob + Oa) − (Fb + Fa), and b, faces (Fb + Fa) − (Ob + Oa) according to the convention of Fig. 2 and in the text.
Figure 4: Left, regions in the right fusiform gyrus where there are significant modulatory effects from the medial parietal cortex; right, same effect as individual data points with respect to the face and object condition.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ramachandran, V. S. in The Artful Eye (eds Gregory, R. L. & Harris, J.) 249–267 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, (1994)).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Treisman, A. Features and objects. Quart. J. Exp. Psych. 40 A, 201–237 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kosslyn, S. M. Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, (1996)).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Moran, J. & Desimone, R. Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science 229, 782–784 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Baylis, G. C. & Rolls, E. T. Responses of neurones in the inferior temporal cortex in short term and serial recognition memory tasks. Exp. Brain Res. 65, 614–622 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gross, C. G., Bender, D. B. & Gerstein, G. L. Activity of inferior temporal neurons in behaving monkey. Neuropsychologia 17, 215–229 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Posner, M. I. & Petersen, S. E. The attention system of the human brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 25–42 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fletcher, P. et al. The mind's eye — activation of the precuneus in memory related imagery. Neuroimage 2, 196–200 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Friston, K. J. Testing for anatomically specified regional effects. Human Brain Mapping 5, 133–166 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Haxby, J. et al. The functional organisation of human extrastriate cortex: a PET-rCBF study of selective attention to faces and locations. J. Neurosci. 14, 6336–6353 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Clark, V. P. et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of human visual cortex during face matching: a comparison with positron emission tomography. Neuroimage 4, 1–15 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J. & Chun, M. M. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J. Neurosci. 17, 4302–4311 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Desimone, R. & Gross, C. G. Visual areas in the temporal lobe of the macaque. Brain Res. 178, 363–380 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tanaka, K., Saito, H., Fukada, Y. & Moriya, M. Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. J. Neurosci. 6, 134–144 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gross, G. C. in Handbook of Sensory Physiology (ed. Jung, B. R.) Vol. 7b;, 451–482 (Springer, Berlin, (1972)).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ungerleider, L. G. & Mishkin, M. in Analysis of Behaviour (eds Goodale, M. A. & Mansfield, R. J. Q.) 549–586 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, (1982)).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Malach, R. et al. Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 8135–8139 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sakai, K. & Miyashita, Y. Neural organization for the long-term memory of paired associates. Nature 354, 152–155 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tovee, M. J., Rolls, E. T. & Ramachandrann, V. S. Visual learning in neurons of the primate temporal visual cortex. Neuroreport 7, 2757–2760 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sakia, K. & Miyashita, Y. Neuronal tuning to learned complex forms in vision. Neuroreport 5, 829–832 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Miller, E. K., Li, L. & Desimone, R. Aneural mechanism for working and recognition memory in inferior temporal cortex. Science 254, 1377–1379 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Li, L., Miller, E. K. & Desimone, R. The representation of stimulus familiarity in the anterior inferior temporal cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 69, 1918–1929 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Friedman-Hill, S. R., Robertson, L. C. & Treisman, A. Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions. Science 269, 853–855 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Shallice, T. et al. Brain regions associated with acquisition and retrieval of verbal episodic memory. Nature 368, 633–635 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ishai, A. & Sagi, D. Common mechanisms of visual imagery and perception. Science 268, 1772–1774 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Heinze, H. J. et al. Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans. Nature 372, 543–546 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fink, G. R. et al. Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and trees? Nature 382, 626–629 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Roelfsema, P. R., Engel, A. K., Konig, P. & Singer, W. Visuomotor integration is associated with zero time-lag synchronization among cortical areas. Nature 385, 157–161 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Friston, K. et al. Statistical parametric mapping in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Human Brain Mapping 2, 189–210 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Talairach, J. & Tournoux, P. Co-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain (Thieme, Stuttgart, (1988)).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank our volunteers and the radiography staff at the Wellcome Department. R.J.D., K.J.F., R.S.J.F. and G.R.F. are supported by the Wellcome Trust. The bibliographic support of R. Lai continues to be invaluable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, W1N 3BG, London, UK

    R. J. Dolan, G. R. Fink, A. Holmes, R. S. J. Frackowiak & K. J. Friston

  2. Academic Department of Psychiatry, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, NW3, London, UK

    R. J. Dolan

  3. Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, OX1 3UD, Oxford, UK

    E. Rolls & M. Booth

Authors
  1. R. J. Dolan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. R. Fink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. Rolls
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Booth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Holmes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R. S. J. Frackowiak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. K. J. Friston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. J. Dolan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dolan, R., Fink, G., Rolls, E. et al. How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context. Nature 389, 596–599 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/39309

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/39309

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing