Abstract
FULLERENES have internal cavities large enough to encapsulate atoms1,2. Recently, noble-gas atoms were introduced into about one in a million fullerene molecules3. It is now possible to achieve far greater yields of these noble-gas endohedral compounds4. Because 3He has a spin of 1/2 and is an excellent NMR nucleus5,6, it can be used as a probe for the magnetic shielding environment inside the fullerene cavity. This environment should reflect possible ring currents and hence the aromaticity in fullerenes7–15, an issue that measurements of magnetic susceptibility16,17 have not completely resolved. Here we present 3He NMR spectra of the endohedral compounds 3He@C60 and 3He@C70 (the @ symbol denotes a compound that is endohedral). We find that the 3He nuclei encapsulated in C6o and C70 are shielded by 6 and 29 parts per million respectively, relative to free 3He. These shieldings are unexpectedly large, indicating significant diamagnetic ring currents in C60 and very large ones in C70. Our results also show that, because of its small size and inertness, helium can serve as a useful probe of magnetic molecular properties. In addition, our work represents the first 3He NMR spectra of stable helium compounds.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Heath, J. R. et al. J. Am. chem. Soc. 107, 7779–7780 (1985).
Bethune, D. S., Johnson, R. D., Salem, J. R., de Vries, M. S. & Yannoni, C. S. Nature 366, 123–128 (1993).
Saunders, M., Jiménez-Vázquez, H. A., Cross, R. J. & Poreda, R. J. Science 259, 1428–1430 (1993).
Saunders, M. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. (in the press).
Schrobilgen, G. J. in NMR and the Periodic Table (eds Harris, R. K. & Mann, B. E.) 439–454 (Academic, New York, 1976).
Seydoux, R., Diehl, P., Nazitov, R. K. & Jokisaari, J. J. magn. Reson. 101, 78–83 (1993).
Elser, V. & Haddon, R. C. Nature 325, 792–794 (1987).
Elser, V. & Haddon, R. C. Phys. Rev. A36, 4579–4584 (1987).
Haddon, R. C. & Elser, V. Chem. Phys. Lett. 169, 362–364 (1990).
Pasquarello, A., Schlüter, M. & Haddon, R. C. Science 257, 1660–1661 (1992).
Pasquarello, A., Schlüter, M. & Haddon, R. C. Phys. Review. A47, 1783–1789 (1993).
Fowler, P. W., Lazzeretti, P. & Zanasi, R. Chem. Phys. Lett. 165, 79–86 (1990).
Schmalz, T. G. Chem. Phys. Lett. 175, 3–5 (1990).
Fowler, P. W., Lazzeretti, P., Malagoli, M. & Zanasi, R. J. phys. Chem. 95, 6404–6405 (1991).
Fowler, P. W., Lazzeretti, P., Malagoli, M. & Zanasi, R. Chem. Phys. Lett. 179, 174–180 (1991).
Haddon, R. C. et al. Nature 350, 46–47 (1991).
Ruoff, R. S. et al. J. phys. Chem. 95, 3457–3459 (1991).
Martin, M. L., Delpuech, J.-J. & Martin, G. J. Practical NMR Spectrascopy 404–405 (Heyden, London, 1980).
Cioslowski, J. & Fleischmann, E. D. J. chem. Phys. 94, 3730–3734 (1991).
Bug, A. L. R., Wilson, A. & Voth, G. A. J. phys. Chem. 96, 7864–7869 (1992).
Cioslowski, J. & Nanayakkara, A. J. chem. Phys. 96, 8354–8362 (1992).
Pang, L. & Brisse, F. J. phys. Chem. 97, 8562–8563 (1993).
Breton, J., Gonzales-Platas, J. & Girardet, C. J. chem. Phys. 99, 4036–4040 (1993).
Isaacs, L., Wehrsig, A. & Diederich, F. Helv. chim. Acta 76, 1231–1250 (1993).
Prato, M., Suzuki, T., Wudl, F., Lucchini, V. & Maggini, M. J. Am. chem. Soc. 115, 7876–7877 (1993).
Tanner, M. E., Knobler, C. B. & Cram, D. J. J. org. Chem. 57, 40–46 (1992).
Bausch, J. W. et al. J. Am. chem. Soc. 113, 3205–3206 (1991).
Haddon, R. C. Science 261, 1545–1550 (1993).
Diederich, F. & Whetten, R. L. Acct. Chem. Res. 25, 119–126 (1992).
Kroto, H. W., Heath, J. R., O'Brien, S. C., Curl, R. F. & Smalley, R. E. Nature 318, 162–163 (1985).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saunders, M., Jiménez-Vázquez, H., Cross, R. et al. Probing the interior of fullerenes by 3He NMR spectroscopy of endohedral 3He@C60 and 3He@C70. Nature 367, 256–258 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/367256a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/367256a0
This article is cited by
-
Solid-State \(\mathrm {^3He}\) NMR of the Superconducting Rubidium Endofulleride \(\mathrm {Rb_3(^3He@C_{60})}\)
Applied Magnetic Resonance (2023)
-
On the aromaticity of uracil and its 5-halogeno derivatives as revealed by theoretically derived geometric and magnetic indexes
Structural Chemistry (2021)
-
Shielding cone behavior in the spherical aromatic He@C606−: origin of the record for the most shielded encapsulated 3He nucleus and comparison to He@C706−
Journal of Molecular Modeling (2019)
-
Multinuclear in situ magnetic resonance imaging of electrochemical double-layer capacitors
Nature Communications (2014)
-
Theoretical identification of the lowest energy structure of C70−n Si n , n = 1, 2, 6, 10, and 20 heterofullerenes
Structural Chemistry (2014)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.