Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Disruptive selection for alternative life histories in salmon

Abstract

Many salmon species include males which mature as much as 50% younger and as small as 30% of the adult body size of other males in the population1–8. In the semelparous Pacific salmon Oncorhynchus spp., these small males are known as ‘jacks’, and they compete with larger late-maturing ‘hooknose’ males for opportunity to spawn on the breeding grounds. The existence of jacks is problematical as it is believed that salmon populations should have a single optimal age or size at maturity9–11. I now show, however, that these two alternative life histories are evolutionarily favoured by frequency-dependent disruptive12 selection on the breeding grounds. In coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch), small and large males gain access to females by sneaking and fighting respectively. By contrast, intermediate-sized males are at a competitive disadvantage. Jacks, which are specialized at sneaking, and hooknose males, which are specialized at fighting, have negatively frequency-dependent fitnesses from these alternative breeding tactics. Calculations suggest that the lifetime fitness of jacks is similar to that of hooknose males. Thus, age of maturity in salmon has probably not evolved as a single optimum, but rather as a ‘mixed evolutionarily stable strategy13,14 in which precocious maturity is an evolutionarily viable alternative life history strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jones, J. W., The Salmon (Harper, New York, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Geghards, S. V. Prog. Fish. Cult. 22, 121–123 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kimura, S. Jap. J. Ichthyol. 19, 111–119 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ricker, W. E. in The Stock Concept in Pacific Salmon (eds Simon, R. C. & Larkin, P. A.) 19–160 (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hager, R. C. & Noble, R. E. Prog. Fish. Cult. 38, 144–147 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schmidt, S. P. & House, E. W. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 36, 90–93 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jonsson, B. thesis, Univ. Oslo (1981).

  8. Maekawa, K. Jap. J. Ichthyol. 30, 227–234 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schaffer, W. M. & Elson, P. F. Ecology. 56, 577–590 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schaffer, W. M. Symp. zool. Soc. Lond. 44, 307–326 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Crandall, R. E. & Stearns, S. C. Theor. Populat. Biol. 21, 11–23 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thoday, J. M. Proc. R. Soc. B182, 109–143 (1972).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Maynard Smith, J. Evolution and the Theory of Games (Cambridge University Press, 1982).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Gross, M. R. Z. Tierpsychol. 60, 1–26 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schroder, S. L. in Salmon and Trout Migratory Behavior Symp. (eds Brannon, E. L. & Salo, E. O.) 275–285 (School of Fisheries, University of Washington, Seattle, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kazakov, R. V. J. Fish. Biol. 18, 1–8 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gross, M. R. & Charnov, E. L. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 6937–6948 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Charnov, E. L. The Theory of Sex Allocation (Princeton University Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Charlesworth, B. Evolution in Age-Structured Populations (Cambridge University Press, 1980).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. 1979–1983 Stock Input Information (Washington State Department of Fisheries, Washington DC, 1984).

  21. Ricker, W. E. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 38, 1636–1656 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bilton, H. T., Alderdice, D. F. & Schnute, J. T. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 39, 426–447 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gross, M. R. in Fish Reproduction: Strategies and Tactics (eds Potts, G. W. & Wootton, R. J.) 55–75 (Academic, London, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Iwamoto, R. N., Alexander, B. A. & Hershberger, W. K. Salmonid Reproduction, 8 (School of Fisheries, University of Washington, Seattle, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Slatkin, M. Am. Nat. 114, 384–398 (1979).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Marr, J. C. Stanford Ichthyol. Bull. 2, 157–197 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gross, M. Disruptive selection for alternative life histories in salmon. Nature 313, 47–48 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1038/313047a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/313047a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing