Main

Thyroid tumours are the most common neoplasms of the endocrine system1 with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) representing the most frequent malignancy comprising approximately 80% of all thyroid cancers.2 The diffuse sclerosing variant of PTC is a rare subtype accounting for 1.8% of PTC cases in larger series.3 This subtype exhibits a higher frequency of cervical and distant metastasis4, 5, 6 affiliating with a worse prognosis,7, 8 female preponderance and younger age.4, 9 However, in two published series,10, 11 comprising 15 and 22 patients, respectively, as well as studies with smaller numbers of cases,5, 12 a prognosis similar to that of conventional PTC has been reported. First described by Vickery et al13 as an unusual form of PTC, this subtype is histologically characterized by dense sclerosis, extensive squamous metaplasia, patchy to dense lymphocytic infiltrates, numerous psammoma bodies, and small papillary structures within dilated lymphovascular spaces. The tumour shows involvement of one or both thyroid lobes, usually without forming a dominant mass.1

RET/PTC rearrangements represent one of the two major genetic tumour initiation events in the pathogenesis of PTC particularly in patients after radiation exposure and in children.14, 15, 16 Chromosomal rearrangements linking the promoter and N-terminal domains of unrelated genes to the C-terminal fragment of RET result in the aberrant production of a chimeric form of the receptor in thyroid cells that is constitutively active.17 Several forms have been identified that differ according to the 5′ partner gene involved in the rearrangement, with RET/PTC1 and RET/PTC3 being the most common accounting for >90% of all rearrangements.18

BRAF represent one type of RAF serine/threonine kinases that play a central role in the transduction of signals along the RAS-RAF-MAPK pathway regulating cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis in response to cytokines, hormones, and growth factors.19 This major genetic alteration involved in the pathogenesis of PTC is an activating mutation of the BRAF gene occurring in about 45% of the sporadic type (reviewed by Xing20) resulting in increased kinase activity of BRAF with activation of ERK. BRAF-activating missense point mutations in the kinase domain are clustered in exons 11 and 15 of the gene. About 80% of all mutations display a thymine-to-adenine transversion at nucleotide 1799 (T1799A) leading to a substitution of valine by glutamic acid at amino-acid residue 600 (V600E) in exon 15.21 BRAF mutation-positive tumours have been associated with various subtypes,20 older age of patients,22, 23 extrathyroidal extension,22, 24, 25 and more advanced tumour stage at presentation.22, 25, 26 BRAF mutations have also been linked to tumour progression from well-differentiated papillary to anaplastic carcinoma, possibly with the intermediate step of poorly differentiated carcinoma.24, 27

In most series described so far, RET/PTC rearrangement and activating mutations of BRAF and RAS are mutually exclusive.28, 29, 30 In the light of these findings, we searched in a series of seven cases of diffuse sclerosing variant of PTC for both BRAF mutations and RET/PTC rearrangements in order to elucidate its pathogenetical background, probably providing a putative therapeutic option for this rare variant of PTC.

Materials and methods

Patients and Tumour Samples

Eight cases of the diffuse sclerosing variant of PTC diagnosed between 1999 and 2005 were retrieved from the files of the Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital of Essen, Germany. All samples exhibited the classical features as described by Vickery et al;13 the typical histology is depicted in Figure 1a and b. The clinical data of these eight cases are summarized in Table 1. All patients were female with an age ranging from 14 to 61 years (mean 33.3 years). To the best of our knowledge, none of the patients had a history of radiation exposure (environmental or therapeutic). All tumours showed extrathyroidal extension except one (case 2) and involved both lobes except two (cases 6 and 8). Lymph node metastases were found in six cases (75%). One patient showed serologically Hashimoto's thyroiditis (case 3). All patients gave informed consent.

Figure 1
figure 1

Diffuse sclerosing variant of PTC (hematoxylin and eosin, HE, × 100) showing dense sclerosis, squamous metaplasia and a lymphocytic infiltrate (a). Papillary structures are located within dilated lymphovascular spaces (b; HE, × 200). Representative punching cylinder of 0.2 cm after macrodissection for RNA extraction stained with HE (× 80) (c).

Table 1 Clinical characteristics and results

Macrodissection of Tumour Tissue

Macrodissection from paraffin-embedded specimens to obtain ‘pure’ tumour tissues was performed as follows: areas exhibiting exclusively tumour tissue were marked on histological slides and the corresponding paraffin tissue blocks as previously described by Musholt et al.31 At least five tissue cylinders were obtained from the centres of tumour areas with a punching tool of 0.6 mm diameter and collected in a 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube for DNA extraction. For RNA extraction, multiple tissue cylinders of 0.2 cm diameter obtained as described above were re-embedded in paraffin and cut into multiple 20 μm sections (Figure 1c). To avoid contamination between tumour samples, the punching tool was cleaned with 1% SDS-solution.

Immunohistochemistry

Four micrometre sections of paraffin-embedded tissues of all cases were cut and mounted onto coated slides for immunohistochemical staining. Heat-induced antigen retrieval was carried out with 0.01 M citrate buffer at pH 6.0 for 20 min. Specimens were stained with a polyclonal rabbit anticalcitonin antibody (dilution 1:4800; DAKO, Hamburg, Germany). Staining was detected using a biotin free enhanced polymer step staining technique (EPOS method) with a peroxidase-conjugated polymer backbone coupled with a secondary (anti-rabbit) antibody (EnVision, DAKO, Hamburg, Germany).

Identification of BRAF Mutation

For analysis of BRAF gene mutation, genomic DNA was isolated from the macrodissected tissues. The samples were deparaffinized by xylene/ethanol treatment. DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Exon 15 of BRAF was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with the primers listed in Table 2. Briefly, 2 μl DNA was amplified with 10 pmol of each primer, 200 μM deoxynucleotide triphosphates, 1 × PCR Buffer (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and 1.25 U of Hot Star Taq DNA Polymerase (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) in a final volume of 50 μl. The PCR conditions were initially denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles (denaturation at 94°C for 30 s; annealing at 55°C for 60 s; synthesis at 72°C for 60 s) and a final extension at 72°C for 8 min with a Primus 25 thermocycler (MWG Biotech, Ebersberg, Germany). Amplification products were analysed on 2.3% agarose gel and purified using the Min Elute PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).

Table 2 Primers used in this study16

Nucleotide sequence analysis was performed with the BigDye Terminator v1.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The purified PCR products were sequenced in both directions using BRAF R and BRAF WR primers (Table 2), respectively. Cycle sequencing products were analysed using the ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany).

Owing to an unsatisfactory product for sequence analysis in two cases (samples 5 and 7) additionally a nested PCR was performed. For the first PCR, the external primers BRAF F and BRAF WF (Table 2) were used followed by the internal and external primers BRAF R and BRAF WR for the second PCR.

A case of tall cell variant of PTC with proven T1799A mutation was processed in the same way and served as positive control.

Detection of RET/PTC Rearrangements

RET/PTC rearrangements were analysed by RT-PCR. For RNA extraction tissue cylinders of 0.2 cm diameter were re-embedded in paraffin and cut into multiple 20 μm sections as previously described by Musholt et al.31 One 4 μm section before and one after these collected sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin to prove tumour cells are present (Figure 1c). RNA was extracted using the RNeasy FFPE Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Briefly, tissue sections were deparaffinized by xylene/ethanol treatment. Tissue pellets were resuspended in 150 μl Buffer PKD, 20 μl Proteinase K and incubated overnight on a shaker incubator at 56°C. Further processing of the samples was performed according to the recommendations of the supplier. Total RNA (1 μg) was reverse transcribed to complementary DNA (cDNA) with Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) according to the recommendations of the supplier. Amplification of c-N-ras with PCR was used as quality control for RNA integrity.

At first a general screening for RET/PTC rearrangements was performed by evaluation of expression of both the tyrosine kinase (TK) and extracellular (EC) domains of RET by RT-PCR as described by Nikiforov et al.16 Tumours demonstrating expression of the TK domain with lack of the EC domain were considered to be positive for RET rearrangement. A medullary (MTC) and follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) served as positive and negative control, respectively. The TPC 1 cell line known to harbour RET/PTC1 rearrangement served as positive control. All controls were embedded in paraffin and were processed in the same way as the tumour samples. The same PCR procedure was applied for the determination of RET/PTC 1 and 3 rearrangements; the primers used (Table 2) have been reported previously.16 One case of PTC that harbour RET/PTC3 rearrangement proven by sequencing (data not shown) served as positive control. Amplification products were analysed on 2.3% agarose gel, visualized by ethidium bromide and purified using the Min Elute PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The samples producing the specific TK and EC domains were sequenced for confirmation.

Subsequently, the presence of the most common types of RET rearrangement (RET/PTC1 and RET/PTC3) were analysed in detail using the nested RT-PCR assay described by Chua et al.32 For each PCR, 2 μl cDNA was amplified with 10 pmol of each primer (Table 2), 200 μM deoxynucleotide triphosphates, 1 × PCR buffer (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and 1 U of Hot Star Taq DNA Polymerase (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) in a final volume of 30 μl. After an initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, amplification was performed over 40 cycles consisting of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 45 s, 72°C for 45 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min in a Primus 25 Thermocycler (MWG Biotech, Ebersberg, Germany) machine. PCR products were analysed on 2.3% agarose gelatine, purified using the Min Elute PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and sequenced for confirmation as described above.

Results

BRAF Mutations in Tumour Samples

All eight tumours of the present series were negative for the typical thymine → adenine missense mutation at nucleotide 1799 of the BRAF gene. Sequence analysis of a representative case (case 2) and the positive control are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2
figure 2

Sequence analysis of BRAF exon 15 in one patient (case 2) showing wild-type sequence (above) and in the positive control (PTC, tall cell variant) (down) harbouring the T1799A transversion.

RET/PTC Rearrangements Tumour Samples

From eight cases of DSVPTC seven (all except case 3) had the required quality of RNA and produced the c-N-ras band of 236 bp (Figure 3a). Tissue samples of case 3 were analysed in triplicate without providing a satisfactory RNA extraction result; thus, we assumed that the starting material only offered poor RNA quality, omitting this case from further investigations. The examination of the remaining seven samples showed the expression of the specific TK band of 155 bp in the absence of the EC band of 184 bp in all cases (Figure 3b). This was also confirmed by nucleotide sequence analysis (data not shown). The immunohistochemical examination of all tumour samples with antibodies against calcitonin was consistently negative (data not shown). These results suggest the presence of a RET/PTC rearrangement in all seven cases investigated. The additional analysis of RET/PTC 1 and RET/PTC 3 rearrangements revealed RET/PTC1 rearrangement in 2/7 cases (28%) and RET/PTC 3 in 1/7 cases (14%) (Figure 4a). Sequence analysis of RET/PTC 1 (case 1) and RET/PTC 3 (case 2) are shown in Figure 4b.

Figure 3
figure 3

(a) Amplification of 236-bp sequence of c-N-ras cDNA for proving RNA integrity. All samples except case 3 and all controls showed detectable levels of N-ras transcripts. (b) Screening of the remaining seven cases (excluding case 3) for RET gene arrangements. Amplification of the fragments corresponding to the TK (above) and EC domains (down) of RET demonstrate expression of TK lacking the EC domain. The generation of both amplicons is demonstrated in the wild-type RET (MTC). TPC1 and FTC served as positive and negative control of the TK domain.

Figure 4
figure 4

(a) RET/PTC 1 and 3 analysis by RT-PCR. Amplification of the samples demonstrate two cases harbouring RET/PTC 1 (cases 1 and 8, above). Case 2 shows RET/PTC 3 (down). (b) Sequence analysis of RET/PTC 1 (case 1, above) and RET/PTC 3 (case 2, down). The fusion points of the involved genes are indicated by vertical bars.

Discussion

Several studies have shown that BRAF mutations and RET/PTC rearrangements are strictly alternative pathways in the etiopathogenesis of PTC28, 29, 30 although one study reported a single patient with coexisting BRAF mutation and RET/PTC rearrangement.33 Activating mutations of BRAF represent the most common genetic alteration in PTCs with reported frequencies ranging from 2926 to 83%34 with an overall prevalence of approximately 45% (reviewed by Xing20). The T1799A transversion in exon 15 has been associated with distinct histological subtypes of PTC (the highest prevalence was shown for the tall cell variant with 77%, followed by the conventional type with 60%).24, 28, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 The lowest prevalence was reported for the follicular variant (12%) (reviewed by Xing20). A literature search revealed seven cases of diffuse sclerosing variant of PTC examined for BRAF V599E mutation so far (Table 3).24, 38, 39, 40 In accordance with the findings of the present study, four out of these seven cases lacked BRAF mutation.24, 38, 40 In contrast, Salvatore et al,39 examining both thyroid aspirates and corresponding paraffin-embedded surgical samples by SSCP and DNA sequencing, found BRAF mutations in two out of three patients (66%) with this rare variant. These discrepancies either indicate that BRAF mutations may be the initiating genetic event in a small proportion of this subtype or Salvatore et al may have included cases not representing ‘true’ cases.

Table 3 Diffuse sclerosing variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma and BRAF

In order to confirm our negative BRAF results in all cases, we performed the RET/PTC rearrangement screening method originally described by Nikiforov et al,16 which has been subsequently used by other investigators for the general demonstration of RET/PTC rearrangements.41, 42 Using this method, we found a consistent and reproducible lack of the EC domain in all seven cases investigated, whereas the TK domain of RET could be equally consistent and reproducible demonstrated in all cases. Subsequently, RET/PTC types 1 and 3 rearrangements were found in three cases, suggesting that the remaining four cases may harbour one of the rare types of RET/PTC rearrangement. However, owing to the study of Learoyd et al43 demonstrating a different prevalence of the RET TK domain mRNA using different sets of primers, we are aware that our results have to be interpreted with caution. As we used RT-PCR with RET TK exon 15/17 primers that resulted in the study of Learoyd et al in a significantly lower prevalence of 24% (12 of 50 PTC) of the RET TK domain compared with RET TK exon 12/13 that was amplified in 35 of 50 PTC (70%), it seems to be most likely that our results do not represent artefacts. An unwanted contamination with C cells leading to a false-positive TK domain result was virtually excluded by immunohistochemistry of the tissue samples investigated. In the light of our results, it is tempting to suggest for the remaining four cases that the occurrence of one of the alternative rearrangement types mostly but not exclusively (RET/ELKS) found in post-radiation-induced PTCs (RET/PTC 5, RET/PTC 6, RET/PTC 7, RET/KTN 1, RET/RFG 8, RET/PCM-1).44

RET/PTC1 and RET/PTC3 account for >90% of all rearrangements found in PTCs.18 Various types of RET/PTC rearrangement have been correlated with histological variants with RET/PTC1 being more common in tumours with pure or predominantly papillary growth.45 Obvious correlation between different types of RET/PTC and morphological features have also been observed in tumours from children exposed to radiation after the Chernobyl accident. The solid variant of PTC correlated strongly with RET/PTC3, whereas the conventional type was regularly referred to RET/PTC1.16, 46, 47 To our knowledge, RET/PTC rearrangement has been reported in 15 diffuse sclerosing variants so far, presumably including eight (sporadic) cases without radiation exposure history and seven post-Chernobyl cases (Table 4).16, 39, 47, 48, 49 Excluding six cases, which do not explicitly describe the type of rearrangement,39, 48 RET/PTC1 rearrangement was found in six (four with radiation history) out of nine (67%) patients, the remaining three cases with radiation exposure exhibited RET/PTC3 (33%) rearrangement.

Table 4 Diffuse sclerosing variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma and RET/PTC rearrangements

RET/PTC rearrangements have also been reported to show a higher prevalence in children and young adults50, 51, 52 with RET/PTC 1 representing the major type. As the average age of patients with this subtype is considerably lower compared with other types of PTC,10, 11 it is not surprising that RET/PTC rearrangement represents the initiating genetic event of this variant. However, it is intriguing to note that one of our patients was aged 61 at the initial diagnosis (showing RET/PTC type 1 rearrangement).

Heterogeneity in distribution of RET/PTC rearrangement within one tumour has been demonstrated by two studies.53, 54 Using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), Unger et al53 revealed that within a single PTC, only a subset of tumour cells (not more than 46%) showed RET/PTC rearrangement beside areas completely lacking tumour cells with RET/PTC rearrangement. In contrast to these studies, Zhu et al54 using FISH technique reported that the vast majority (50–86%) if not all tumour cells carried the rearrangement. They also provide evidence of a broad variability in the prevalence of RET/PTC rearrangement owing to usage of different detection methods (three different RT-PCR methods, FISH, Southern blot analysis). The macrodissection method used for this study,36 however, seems to be well suited to obtain sufficient amounts of RNA from representative tumour areas to demonstrate RET/PTC rearrangement.

Our results do not allow to draw conclusions concerning a correlation between type of RET/PTC rearrangement and clinical behaviour or nodal metastasis, respectively, as described by others.45, 55, 56 All three patients with an identified rearrangement type initially presented with locally advanced stage of disease and nodal involvement, which has presumably to be attributed to this special variant rather than to the underlying genetic event.

Melillo et al57 have shown the oncogenic proteins encoded either by BRAF or rearranged RET/PTC genes work along the same signalling cascade with each of them being a possible focus of targeted cancer therapy. BAY 43-9006, a biaryl urea that targets RAF-1 and BRAF as well as other TKs58 is now being tested in a phase II study of patients with locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent thyroid cancer in the United States. ZD6474, a low molecular TK inhibitor was shown in vivo to block phosphorylation and signalling of both RET/PTC3 and RET/MEN2B,59 may be a promising candidate for targeted therapy of diffuse sclerosing variant of PTC.