Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Volume 52 Issue 5, May 2023

The case for including more female mice in research

Male mice have been the default in scientific experiments for decades, based on the assumption that hormonal fluctuations across the estrous cycle make females more variable than males. In a News & Views this month, Bronwyn Graham discusses recent findings showing that the estrous phase had little effect on the exploratory behavior of female mice, and that female mice were actually less variable than males.

See Graham

COVER IMAGE: Marina Spence. COVER DESIGN: Marina Spence.

In This Issue

Top of page ⤴

Protocol Review

Top of page ⤴

Correspondence

Top of page ⤴

Research Highlights

Top of page ⤴

News & Views

  • A recent study performed directed C5-cytosine methylation of CpG islands to demonstrate that acquired methylation at critical loci could be reestablished for multiple generations in mice. This work provides a manipulatable system to examine how non-genetic information is transmitted across generations to regulate complex phenotypes.

    • Gautam Sarkar
    • Eric Lieberman Greer
    News & Views
  • New research using high-dimensional behavioural analyses has further undermined the “females are the more variable sex” trope that often accompanies all-male studies. But when we consider the benefits to the inclusion of females in research, their lesser variability is only the icing on the cake. It’s just good science, really.

    • Bronwyn M. Graham
    News & Views Open Access
Top of page ⤴

Search

Quick links