Abstract
Sphygmomanometers are the cornerstone of blood pressure management and yet there is no national standard for the regulation of this equipment in the UK. It is known that these machines may often be inaccurate, particularly those used in the community. We embarked upon a survey of all sphygmomanometers in current use in one inner city primary care group. Contrary to our initial hypothesis, inaccuracy rates were lower than in other reported community surveys with 2.3% of mercury and 14.8% of anaeroid sphygmomanometers failing the test. Surprisingly, inaccurate machines did not cluster in the less well developed practices. The implication is that all practices need to have procedures in place for the regular calibration of their sphygmomanometers.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ashworth, M., Gordon, K., Baker, G. et al. Sphygmomanometer calibration: a survey of one inner-city primary care group. J Hum Hypertens 15, 259–262 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001172
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001172
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Automated Sphygmomanometers Should Not Replace Manual Ones, Based on Current Evidence
American Journal of Hypertension (2008)