Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Airborne manufactured nano-objects released from commercially available spray products: temporal and spatial influences

Abstract

This paper reports a study of the dispersion of manufactured nano-objects (MNOs) through the air, both in time and space, during the use of two commercially available nano-spray products and comparable products without MNOs. The main objective was to identify whether personal exposure can occur at a greater distance than the immediate proximity of the source (>1 m from the source), that is, in the “far field” (bystanders), or at a period after the emission occurred (re-entry). The spray experiments were conducted in an experimental room with well-controlled environmental and ventilation conditions (19.5 m3). The concentration of MNOs was investigated by measuring real-time size distribution, number, and active surface area concentration. For off-line analysis of the particles in the air, samples for scanning/transmission electron microscopy and elemental analysis were collected. The release of MNOs was measured at 30 and 290 cm from the source (“near field” and “far field”, respectively). For all four spray products, the maximum number and surface area concentrations in the “near field” exceeded the maximum concentrations reached in the “far field”. At 2 min after the emission occurred, the concentration in both the “near field” and “far field” reached a comparable steady-state level above background level. These steady-state concentrations remained elevated above background concentration throughout the entire measurement period (12 min). The results of the real-time measurement devices mainly reflect the liquid aerosols emitted by the spray process itself rather than only the MNO, which hampers the interpretation of the results. However, the combination of the off-line analysis and the results of the real-time devices indicates that after the use of nano-spray products, personal exposure to MNOs can occur not only in the near field, but also at a greater distance than the immediate proximity of the source and at a period after emission occurred.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maynard AD, Aitken RJ, Butz T, Colvin V, Donaldson K, Oberdörster G et al. Safe handling of nanotechnology. Nature 2006; 444: 267–269.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nemmar A., Vanbilloen H., Hoylaerts MF, Hoet PH, Verbruggen A., Nemery B . Passage of intratracheally instilled ultrafine particles from the lung into the systemic circulation in hamster. Am J Resp Crit Care 2001; 164: 1665–1668.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Oberdörster G., Sharp Z., Atudorei V., Elder A., Gelein R., Lunts A. et al. Extrapulmonary translocation of ultrafine carbon particles following whole-body inhalation exposure of rats. J Toxicol Environ Health 2002; 65: 1531–1543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Elder A., Gelein R., Silva V., Feikert T., Opanashuk L., Carter J et al. Translocation of inhaled ultrafine manganese oxide particles to the central nervous system. Environ Health Persp 2006; 114: 1172–1178.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Oberdörster G., Sharp Z., Atudorei V., Elder A., Gelein R., Kreyling W et al. Translocation of inhaled ultrafine particles to the brain. Inhal Toxicol 2004; 16: 437–445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Takenaka S, Karg E., Roth C., Schulz H., Ziesenis A., Heinzmann U et al. Pulmonary and systemic distribution of inhaled ultrafine silver particles in rats. Environ Health Persp 2001; 109 (Supp 4): 547–551.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schneider T., Brouwer DH., Koponen IK., Jensen KA, Fransman W., Van Duuren-Stuurman B et al. Conceptual model for assessment of inhalation exposure to manufactured nanoparticles. J Expo Sci Env Epid 2011; 21: 450–463.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Norgaard AW, Jensen KA, Janfelt C., Lauritsen FR, Clausen PA, Wolkoff P. . Release of VOCs and particles during use of nanofilm spray products. Environ Sci Technol 2009; 43: 7824–7830.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Quadros M E, Marr LC . Silver nanoparticles and total aerosols emitted by nanotechnology-related consumer spray products. Environ Sci Technol 2011; 45: 10713–10719.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen BT, Afshari A., Stone S., Jackson M., Schwegler-Berry D., Frazer DG et al. Nanoparticles-containing spray can aerosol: characterization, exposure assessment, and generator design. Inhal Toxicol 2010; 22: 1072–1082.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nazarenko Y., Han T. W., Lioy P. J., Mainelis G. . Potential for exposure to engineered nanoparticles from nanotechnology-based consumer spray products. J. Expo Sci Env Epid 2011; 21: 515–528.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hagendorfer H., Lorenz C., Kaegi R., Sinnet B., Gehrig R., Goetz NV et al. Size-fractionated characterization and quantification of nanoparticle release rates from a consumer spray product containing engineered nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 2010; 12: 2481–2494.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lorenz C., Hagendorfer H., Von Goetz N., Kaegi R., Gehrig R., Ulrich A et al. Nanosized aerosols from consumer sprays: experimental analysis and exposure modeling for four commercial products. J Nanopart Res 2011; 13: 3377–3391.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Delmaar JE, Bremmer HJ The ConsExpo spray Model. Modeling and experimental validation of the inhalation exposure of consumers to aerosols from spray cans and trigger sprays. RIVM report 2009 320104005/2009. Available at http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/320104005.pdf.

  15. Seipenbusch M., Binder A., Kasper G . Temporal evolution of nanoparticle aerosols in workplace exposure. Ann Occup Hyg 2008; 52: 707–716.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. van Duuren-Stuurman B, Vink SR, Verbist KJM, Heussen HGA, Brouwer DH, Kroese DED et al. Stoffenmanager nano version 1.0: a web-based tool for risk prioritization of airborne manufactured nano objects. Ann Occup Hyg 2012; 56: 525–541.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment for funding and RJ Schimmel and R Engel for their assistance during the experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cindy Bekker.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bekker, C., Brouwer, D., van Duuren-Stuurman, B. et al. Airborne manufactured nano-objects released from commercially available spray products: temporal and spatial influences. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 24, 74–81 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2013.36

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2013.36

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links