Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review
  • Published:

Reviews

The mechanism of weight loss with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: induction of satiety not restriction

International Journal of Obesity volume 35, pages S26–S30 (2011)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) has rapidly emerged as a popular bariatric procedure because of its safety, efficacy, durability and adjustability. Despite widespread use, there is limited understanding of how it induces weight loss. Previously, it has been classified as a restrictive procedure, physically limiting the patient to a small meal that subsequently slowly empties into the distal stomach. However, the tiny pouch of stomach created above the LAGB appears to be unable to accommodate even the smallest of meals. Therefore, the key mechanism has been hypothesized to be the induction of satiety via, as yet, undefined pathways. The critical question remains: what are the key physiological changes that lead to satiety and weight loss? In successful LAGB patients, a consistent intraluminal pressure at the level of the LAGB of 26.9±19.8 mm Hg is observed. Studies using semi-solid swallows combined with intraluminal pressure recordings have demonstrated that semi-solid transit across the resistance of the LAGB is mediated by repeated esophageal peristaltic contractions (mean 4.5±2.9) that produce episodic flow, interspersed by reflux events. Failed transit results in obstruction and regurgitation, whereas dilatation of the supraband stomach induces severe and intolerable reflux. Overall gastric emptying does not appear to be significantly altered following LAGB. Focused investigations have shown that the supraband stomach is empty of an ingested meal 1–2 min after intake ceases. Considerable progress has been made in understanding the mechanical physiological effects of the LAGB on esophageal and proximal gastric function. These have been correlated with patient outcomes and sensations. On the basis of recent data, it appears that the LAGB activates the peripheral satiety mechanism without physically restricting the meal size. Therefore, it should not be classified as a restrictive procedure. The precise mechanism of weight loss with the LAGB remains to be delineated.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Favretti F, Ashton D, Busetto L, Segato G, De Luca M . The gastric band: first-choice procedure for obesity surgery. World J Surg 2009; 10: 2039–2048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Brien PE, Brown WA, Smith A, McMurrick PJ, Stephens M . Prospective study of a laparoscopically placed, adjustable gastric band in the treatment of morbid obesity. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 113–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Brien PE, Sawyer SM, Laurie C, Brown WA, Skinner S, Veit F et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in severely obese adolescents: a randomized trial. JAMA 2010; 303: 519–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Brien PE, McPhail T, Chaston TB, Dixon JB . Systematic review of medium-term weight loss after bariatric operations. Obes Surg 2006; 16: 1032–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. de Jong JR, van Ramshorst B, Gooszen HG, Smout AJ, Tiel-Van Buul MM . Weight loss after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is not caused by altered gastric emptying. Obes Surg 2009; 19: 287–292.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dixon AF, Dixon JB, O’Brien PE . Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding induces prolonged satiety: a randomized blind crossover study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005; 90: 813–819.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Burton PR, Brown W, Laurie C, Richards M, Afkari S, Yap K et al. The effect of laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands on esophageal motility and the gastroesophageal junction; analysis using high resolution video manometry. Obes Surg 2009; 19: 905–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burton PR, Yap K, Brown WA, Laurie C, O’Donnell M, Hebbard G et al. Effects of adjustable gastric bands on gastric emptying, supra- and infraband transit and satiety: a randomized double-blind crossover trial using a new technique of band visualization. Obes Surg 2010; 20: 1690–1697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Speakman JR . Obesity: the integrated roles of environment and genetics. J Nutr 2004; 134: 2090S–2105S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Prentice A, Jebb S . Energy intake/physical activity interactions in the homeostasis of body weight regulation. Nut Rev 2004; 62: S98–S104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Keesey RE . Physiological regulation of body weight and the issue of obesity. Med Clin North Am 1989; 73: 15–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Garrow JS . Energy balance in man—an overview. Am J Clin Nutr 1987; 45: 1114–1119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Busetto L, Valente P, Pisent C, Segato G, de Marchi F, Favretti F et al. Eating pattern in the first year following adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB) for morbid obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1996; 20: 539–546.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Busetto L, Segato G, De Marchi F, Foletto M, De Luca M, Favretti F et al. Postoperative management of laparoscopic gastric banding. Obes Surg 2003; 13: 121–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schindler K, Prager G, Ballaban T, Kretschmer S, Riener R, Buranyi B et al. Impact of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding on plasma ghrelin, eating behaviour and body weight. Eur J Clin Invest 2004; 34: 549–554.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Horchner R, Tuinebreijer W, Kelder H . Eating patterns in morbidly obese patients before and after a gastric restrictive operation. Obes Surg 2002; 12: 108–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lang T, Hauser R, Buddeberg C, Klaghofer R . Impact of gastric banding on eating behavior and weight. Obes Surg 2002; 12: 100–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Burton PR, Brown W, Laurie C, Lee M, Korin A, Anderson M et al. Outcomes, satiety, and adverse upper gastrointestinal symptoms following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg 2011; 21: 574–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Burton PR, Brown WA, Laurie CP, Richards M, Hebbard G, O’Brien PE . Effects of gastric band adjustments on intraluminal pressure. Obes Surg 2009; 19: 1508–1514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Burton PR, Brown WA, Laurie C, Hebbard G, O’Brien PE . Mechanisms of bolus clearance in patients with laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands. Obes Surg 2010; 20: 1265–1272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Burton PR, Brown WA, Laurie C, Hebbard G, O’Brien PE . Criteria for assessing esophageal motility in laparoscopic adjustable gastric band patients: the importance of the lower esophageal contractile segment. Obes Surg 2010; 20: 316–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Burton PR, Brown WA, Laurie C, Korin A, Yap K, Richards M et al. Pathophysiology of laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands: analysis and classification using high-resolution video manometry and a stress barium protocol. Obes Surg 2010; 20: 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Burton PR, Brown WA, Laurie C, Hebbard G, O’Brien PE . Predicting outcomes of intermediate term complications and revisional surgery following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: utility of the CORE classification and Melbourne motility criteria. Obes Surg 2010; 20: 1516–1523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Woods SC . Gastrointestinal satiety signals I. An overview of gastrointestinal signals that influence food intake. Am J Physiol 2004; 286: G7–G13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Crowell MD, Decker GA, Levy R, Jeffrey R, Talley NJ . Gut-brain neuropeptides in the regulation of ingestive behaviors and obesity. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 2848–2856; quiz 914.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Murphy KG, Bloom SR . Gut hormones and the regulation of energy homeostasis. Nature 2006; 444: 854–859.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Murphy KG, Dhillo WS, Bloom SR . Gut peptides in the regulation of food intake and energy homeostasis. Endocr Rev 2006; 27: 719–727.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. de Fatima Haueisen Sander Diniz M, de Azeredo Passos VM, Diniz MT . Gut-brain communication: how does it stand after bariatric surgery? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2006; 9: 629–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang Y, Liu J . Plasma ghrelin modulation in gastric band operation and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 2009; 19: 357–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Geary N . Endocrine controls of eating: CCK, leptin, and ghrelin. Physiol Behav 2004; 81: 719–733.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Obesity Research and Education, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    P R Burton & W A Brown

Authors
  1. P R Burton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W A Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P R Burton.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

WA Brown received consulting fees from Allergan and an unrestricted research grant for her team from Allergan. WA Brown has also served as an expert witness for medical legal cases in relation to obesity surgery. PR Burton declares no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burton, P., Brown, W. The mechanism of weight loss with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: induction of satiety not restriction. Int J Obes 35 (Suppl 3), S26–S30 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2011.144

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2011.144

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links