Abstract
Recent scientific controversy over the accuracy of population attributable fraction (PAF) estimates for obesity as a cause of mortality has made the concept of PAF visible in both scientific and popular news. The PAF is widely thought to provide information about causation, or attribution, of disease and also to provide information on the consequences of interventions to eliminate the exposure of interest. I discuss the methodological and conceptual limitations of the PAF in providing these two kinds of information. Because of these limitations, the PAF does not provide scientists or policy makers with an accurate answer to the question, How much of the disease burden could be eliminated if the exposure was eliminated from the population? Further, these limitations cannot be overcome merely by better statistical modeling; they must be addressed through more rigorous discussion of specific interventions and the causal consequences of such interventions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Flegal KM, Graubard BI, Williamson DF, Gail MH . Excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity. J Am Med Assoc 2005; 293: 1861–1867.
Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL . Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. J Am Med Assoc 2004; 291: 1238–1245.
Allison DB, Fontaine KR, Manson JE, Stevens J, VanItallie TB . Annual deaths attributable to obesity in the United States. J Am Med Assoc 1999; 282: 1530–1538.
Couzin J . Public health. A heavyweight battle over CDC's obesity forecasts. Science 2005; 308: 770–771.
Greenland S, Robins JM . Conceptual problems in the definition and interpretation of attributable fractions. Am J Epidemiol 1988; 128: 1185–1197.
Wacholder S, Benichou J, Heineman EF, Hartge P, Hoover RN . Attributable risk: advantages of a broad definition of exposure. Am J Epidemiol 1994; 140: 303–309.
Baron JA . The clinical utility of risk factor data. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 1013–1020.
Rockhill B, Weinberg CR, Newman B . Population attributable fraction estimation for established breast cancer risk factors: considering the issues of high prevalence and unmodifiability. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 147: 826–833.
Kempthorne O . Logical, epistemological, and statistical aspects of nature–nurture data interpretation. Biometrics 1978; 34: 1–23.
Hernan M . Hypothetical interventions to define causal effects—afterthought or prerequisite? Am J Epidemiol 2005; 162: 618–620.
Benichou J . Attributable risk. In: Armitage P, Colton T (eds). Encyclopedia of Biostatistics, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, 2005, pp 216–299.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Levine, B. The other causality question: estimating attributable fractions for obesity as a cause of mortality. Int J Obes 32 (Suppl 3), S4–S7 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2008.81
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2008.81
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Are Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Preconception Diabetes Mellitus Less Common in Non-Hispanic Black Women than in Non-Hispanic White Women?
Maternal and Child Health Journal (2014)
-
Workshop on estimating the health burden of overweight and obesity
International Journal of Obesity (2008)