Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

In vivo induction of antitumor immunity and protection against tumor growth by injection of CD154-expressing tumor cells

Abstract

As they should enhance tumor-specific antigen presentation by dendritic cells, tumor cell lines genetically modified to express CD154 molecules have been used in an attempt to induce protective antitumor immunity. Two murine models were used: the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I negative melanoma B16F10 and the MHC class I positive mammary adenocarcinoma TS/A. CD154 or mock-transfected B16F10 or TS/A cells were injected subcutaneously into H-2–compatible B6D2 mice. CD154 expression by tumor cells induced a complete rejection (in the TS/A model) or a striking reduction (in the B16F10 model) of modified tumors growth, but also a significant protection against the growth of mock tumor cells injected simultaneously, either mixed with the CD154-expressing tumor cells, or in the other flank of mice. Thirty days after CD154-expressing tumor rejection, splenic lymphocytes from surviving tumor-free mice were able to inhibit tumor proliferation in vitro and significant amounts of IFN-γ were detected in the sera of these mice. Growth kinetics of mock and CD154-expressing tumors in immunocompetent versus nude mice suggest that T lymphocytes and natural killer cells responses are implicated in this antitumor immunity. The injection of CD154-expressing tumor cell induced an antitumor protective response, both locally and distant from the injection site. The effect was most pronounced in MHC class I expressing TS/A tumor model.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van den Eynde BJ, van der Bruggen P . T cell defined tumor antigens Curr Opin Immunol 1997 9: 684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Couderc B, Zitvogel L, Douin-Echinard V et al. Enhancement of antitumor immunity by expression of CD70 (CD27 ligand) or CD154 (CD40 ligand) costimulatory molecules in tumor cells Cancer Gene Ther 1998 5: 163

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams IR, Ort RJ, Daley D et al. Constitutive expression of B7-1 (CD80) on mouse keratinocytes does not prevent development of chemically induced skin papillomas and carcinomas J Immunol 1996 156: 3382

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Douin-Echinard V, Robbins PD, Lotze MT, Favre G, Couderc B . Enhancement of anti-tumor immunity by injection of fibroblasts genetically engineered to produce IL-12 and to express CD70 Adv Exp Med Biol 1998 451: 353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nieland JD, Graus YF, Dortmans YE, Kremers BL, Kruisbeek AM . CD40 and CD70 co-stimulate a potent in vivo antitumor T cell response J Immunother 1998 21: 225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Toes REM, Schoenberger SP, van der Voort EIH, Offringa R, Melief CJM . CD40–CD40 ligand interactions and their role in cytotoxic T lymphocyte priming and anti-tumor immunity Semin Immunol 1998 10: 443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moodycliffe AM, Shreedhar V, Ullrich SE et al. CD40–CD40 ligand interactions in vivo regulate migration of antigen-bearing dendritic cells from the skin to draining lymph nodes J Exp Med 2000 191: 2011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Schuurhuis DH, Laban S, Toes RE et al. Immature dendritic cells acquire CD8(+) cytotoxic T lymphocyte priming capacity upon activation by T helper cell–independent or –dependent stimuli J Exp Med 2000 192: 145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Banchereau J . Dendritic cells: therapeutic potentials Transfus Sci 1997 18: 313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schoenberger SP, Toes RE, van der Voort EI, Offringa R, Melief CJ . T-cell help for cytotoxic T lymphocytes is mediated by CD40–CD40L interactions [see comments] Nature 1998 393: 480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Eggert AA, Schreurs MW, Boerman OC et al. Biodistribution and vaccine efficiency of murine dendritic cells are dependent on the route of administration Cancer Res 1999 59: 3340

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zitvogel L, Mayordomo JI, Tjandrawan T et al. Therapy of murine tumors with tumor peptide–pulsed dendritic cells: dependence on T cells, B7 costimulation, and T helper cell 1–associated cytokines [see comments] J Exp Med 1996 183: 87

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morse MA, Deng Y, Coleman D et al. A Phase I study of active immunotherapy with carcinoembryonic antigen peptide (CAP-1)–pulsed, autologous human cultured dendritic cells in patients with metastatic malignancies expressing carcinoembryonic antigen Clin Cancer Res 1999 5: 1331

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nestle FO, Alijagic S, Gilliet M et al. Vaccination of melanoma patients with peptide- or tumor lysate–pulsed dendritic cells [see comments] Nat Med 1998 4: 328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grohmann U, Belladonna ML, Bianchi R et al. Immunogenicity of tumor peptides: importance of peptide length and stability of peptide/MHC class II complex Cancer Immunol Immunother 1999 48: 195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kugler A, Stuhler G, Walden P et al. Regression of human metastatic renal cell carcinoma after vaccination with tumor cell–dendritic cell hybrids [see comments] Nat Med 2000 6: 332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Douin-Echinard V, Bornes S, Rochaix P et al. The expression of CD70 and CD80 by gene-modified tumor cells induces an antitumor response depending on the MHC status Cancer Gene Ther 2000 7: 1543

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Terheyden P, Straten P, Brocker EB, Kampgen E, Becker JC . CD40-ligated dendritic cells effectively expand melanoma-specific CD8+ CTLs and CD4 + IFN-gamma–producing T cells from tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes J Immunol 2000 164: 663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Giacomini P, Tecce R, Gambari R, Sacchi A, Fisher PB, Natali PG . Recombinant human IFN-gamma but not IFN-alpha or IFN-beta, enhances MHC– and non-MHC–encoded glycoproteins by a protein synthesis–dependent mechanism J Immunol 1988 140: 3073

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Klein C, Bueler H, Mulligan RC . Comparative analysis of genetically modified dendritic cells and tumor cells as therapeutic cancer vaccines J Exp Med 2000 191: 1699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kikuchi T, Moore MA, Crystal RG . Dendritic cells modified to express CD40 ligand elicit therapeutic immunity against preexisting murine tumors Blood 2000 96: 91

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Guilloux Y, Bai XF, Liu X, Zheng P, Liu Y . Optimal induction of effector but not memory antitumor cytotoxic T lymphocytes involves direct antigen presentation by the tumor cells Cancer Res 2001 61: 1107

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Claudius Regaud Institut and the Association for Research against Cancer. We thank Marie Penary and Danièle Berg for excellent biotechnical assistance, and Christiane Pages and Lourdes Gasquet from the animal facility.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne-Françoise Tilkin-Mariamé.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grangeon, C., Cormary, C., Douin-Echinard, V. et al. In vivo induction of antitumor immunity and protection against tumor growth by injection of CD154-expressing tumor cells. Cancer Gene Ther 9, 282–288 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cgt.7700439

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cgt.7700439

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links