Main

Growth and metastasis of solid tumours are considered to strictly depend on angiogenesis (Folkman, 1992). However, especially in organs with high vessel densities such as lung, liver and brain, the dependency of infiltrative tumours on angiogenesis is not always evident because the pre-existent vasculature may supply sufficient blood to the tumour cells to allow tumour progression. In the brain, the prototypes of such tumours are the diffuse infiltrative gliomas. Importantly, co-opted blood vessels in such brain tumours may be relatively unaffected by the tumour cells and may retain the highly specialised blood–brain barrier function (Kusters et al, 2002; Leenders et al, 2003). This probably explains why diffuse infiltrative parts of glioblastoma multiforma, the most frequent and most malignant glial brain tumour, as well as low-grade, infiltrative gliomas do not show enhancement in Gadolinium-DTPA (Gd-DTPA) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Leenders et al, 2003). Indeed, in brain tumours, Gd-DTPA leaks from the vascular system into the interstitial space only when the blood–brain barrier is disrupted, that is, when the tumour increases the permeability of pre-existing blood vessels or induces the growth of leaky blood vessels.

The detailed characterisation of tumour vasculature with respect to permeability and vascular volume provides essential insight into tumour physiology and is a prerequisite to investigate and evaluate tumour response to antiangiogenic therapy. Apart from Gd-DTPA, superparamagnetic ultrasmall iron oxide particles (USPIO)-enhanced MRI has been demonstrated to be useful for the characterisation of the tumour vasculature (Dennie et al, 1998; Su et al, 1998; Le Duc et al, 1999; Tropres et al, 2001; Turetschek et al, 2001; Kusters et al, 2002; Bremer et al, 2003; Leenders et al, 2003; Pathak et al, 2003; Robinson et al, 2003; van Laarhoven et al, 2006). Although Gd-DTPA is used routinely in the clinic since many years, USPIOs have only recently been introduced for human applications (Enochs et al, 1999; Harisinghani et al, 2003). Superparamagnetic ultrasmall iron oxide particle contrast agents remain intravascular for a prolonged period of time and drastically increase the transverse water proton MR relaxation rate, the USPIO T2 relaxivity being up to 20 times that of Gd-DTPA (Gambarota et al, 2006). Superparamagnetic ultrasmall iron oxide particle thus provides a good marker for alterations in blood volume in different tissues, a characteristic that might be exploited for tumour detection and characterisation, such as in human brain (Enochs et al, 1999; Varallyay et al, 2002; Taschner et al, 2005). Although the USPIO-induced signal dephasing extends beyond the size of the main magnetic field perturbers, that is, the blood vessels, this does not seem to confound tumour delineation at the human scale. Previous studies have already shown that magnetic susceptibility effects caused by USPIO can be used to assess relative blood volumes within tumours (Dennie et al, 1998; Le Duc et al, 1999). In particular, the change in the transverse relaxation rates ΔR2 and ΔR2* after injection of USPIO provides an index proportional to the blood volume of the microvasculature and macrovasculature, respectively (Kennan et al, 1994; Weisskoff et al, 1994). In murine brain tumours, however, so far only qualitative measurements of the decrease in signal intensity following USPIO administration have been reported (Leenders et al, 2003).

We have previously shown that treatment of angiogenic brain tumours with ZD6474, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with specificity towards vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor 2 and the epidermal growth factor receptor, resulted in conversion to a nonangiogenic phenotype, characterised by perivascular growth along pre-existent vessels (Leenders et al, 2004). Importantly, this treatment also resulted in restoration of the blood–brain barrier and a concomitant inability to detect these tumours with conventional Gd-DTPA MRI. This restoration of the blood–brain barrier may thus lead to overestimation of therapeutic efficacy. To detect infiltratively growing brain tumours, MR-based quantification of blood volume may have added value in evaluating antiangiogenic therapies. Indeed, we have previously shown that intracerebral lesions of Mel57, a human melanoma cell line with no notable expression of VEGF-A, were not detectable in Gd-DTPA MR images, yet were visible in T2 images after intravenous injection of USPIOs (Leenders et al, 2003). Similar results have been obtained with intracerebral U87 xenografts (Claes et al, 2008). This detection was based on the low intratumoral vascular volume, relative to the surrounding brain parenchyma.

In the current study, we aimed to develop imaging protocols that better define the vascular characteristics of different tumours. Tumour models were used, of which the vasculature has been extensively characterised at the morphological level. Tumour-bearing mice were subjected to both Gd-DTPA and USPIO imaging. Blood volume maps were generated for all tumours, by calculating ΔR2 and ΔR2* following USPIO administration.

Materials and methods

Tumour models

E34 is a transplantable human glioblastoma xenograft line that is maintained as subcutaneous tumours in mice (Claes et al, 2008 accepted in Brain Pathology). On the day of intracerebral tumour injection, a nude mouse carrying a subcutaneous E34 xenograft was killed. The tumour was removed under sterile conditions and minced to small pieces using a scalpel. A tumour cell suspension was prepared by gently filtering the homogenate through a 70-μm mesh filter. Twenty microlitres of this cell suspension was transcranially injected, 3 mm under the skull under standardised conditions. The procedure was carried out with 7- to 8-week-old Balb/c nude mice under anaesthesia with a mixture of 1.3% isoflurane in N2O/O2. This procedure reproducibly results in neurological symptoms due to intracerebral tumour growth 24–30 days after injection.

U87 glioma cells and stable VEGF-A165 transfectants of Mel57 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum essentially as described before (Kusters et al, 2002). For the U87 tumour model, 1 × 105 cells were injected transcranially using the same procedure as described for E34. Mel57-VEGF-A165 cells were injected in the internal carotid artery using a microsurgical procedure that was described before (Kusters et al, 2001). Using this melanoma metastasis model, multiple lesions develop in the brain parenchyma that display all hallmarks of angiogenesis (including leaky, highly dilated vessels). All experiments were approved by the Animal Experimental Committee of the Radboud University Nijmegen.

Magnetic resonance imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging was performed as described in a previous study (Leenders et al, 2003). Mice were anaesthesised with isoflurane (1.5–2%) in N2O/O2; in each mouse, a catheter was inserted in a lateral tail vein to allow administration of contrast agent. A 10-mm diameter surface transmitter/receiver RF coil was positioned over the mouse head. During the measurements, the body temperature of the mice was maintained with a warm water pad.

Magnetic resonance imaging experiments were performed on a 7 T/200 mm horizontal-bore MR magnet interfaced to an SMIS console and equipped with a gradient insert (gradient strength=150 mT m−1 and rise time=150 μs). The image acquisition protocol started with three gradient-echo scout images for slice positioning. The protocol of the Gd-DTPA contrast-enhanced MRI consisted of T1-weighted multislice gradient-echo images with TR/TE=400/6 ms, voxel size=136 × 136 × 1000 μm, 16 slices, receiver bandwidth=100 kHz, scan time=1 min 16 s. The images were acquired prior to and 1, 2, 10 and 20 min after administration of Gd-DTPA (Magnevist®; Schering, Berlin, Germany) at a dose of 0.2 mmol kg−1.

A number of pilot experiments were performed to optimise the protocol of blood volume measurements. At the dose of USPIO agent used in the current study, a good compromise between signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast enhancement was found for values of TE in the range of 5–10 ms. As susceptibility effects scale linearly with the static magnetic field strength, longer (shorter) values of TE might be advantageous for blood volume measurements at a lower (higher) field. The protocol of the USPIO contrast-enhanced MRI consisted of multislice gradient-echo (TR/TE=1500/7 ms, 16 slices, voxel size=136 × 136 × 1000 μm, receiver bandwith=100 kHz, scan time=4 min 54 s) and spin-echo (TR/TE=2000/9 ms, 16 slices, voxel size=136 × 136 × 1000 μm, receiver bandwith=100 kHz, scan time=6 min 32 s) imaging performed prior to and following administration of a USPIO blood-pool agent (Sinerem; Guerbet, Roissy, France; 170 μg Fe/mouse). Magnetic resonance imaging with USPIO was performed 2–3 h after Gd-DTPA imaging in mice with intracerebral Mel57-VEGF-A165 (n=4), E34 (n=3) or U87 (n=4) tumours. This time gap allowed complete wash out of Gd-DTPA and enabled a correlation between Gd-DTPA and USPIO enhancement.

Data analysis

For each animal, pixel-by-pixel ΔR2* maps were obtained from the formula where TE is the echo time, and So the signal amplitude pre-USPIO (Sobef) and post-USPIO (Soaft), in the gradient-echo images. The same algorithm was employed to generate ΔR2 maps from the spin-echo images. For each mouse, after ΔR2* and ΔR2 colormaps were generated, three slices were chosen, based on the maximum values of ΔR2* in tumours, as assessed on the ΔR2* colormaps. ΔR2* and ΔR2 were measured in manually segmented ROIs on these slices. For each animal carrying Mel57-VEGF-A165 tumours, at least five lesions were analysed. In the animals carrying E34 and U87 tumours, multiple ROIs (n=9 per mouse) were defined within the tumour. Similarly, ROIs were defined within healthy brain regions (in total, nine ROIs in cortex and nine ROIs in striatum). For each ROI, mean ΔR2 and ΔR2* were calculated by averaging the values of all pixels within the ROI. For each tumour line, as well as for healthy brain regions, the average and standard deviation was calculated from all ROIs. All algorithms were implemented in Matlab (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA).

Histological and immunohistochemical analysis

After the MRI experiments, animals were killed and the brains were removed and fixed in formalin. Coronal slices were embedded in paraffin and processed for immunohistochemical analysis. Vessels in E34, U87 and Mel57-VEGF-A165 lesions were highlighted by staining for the endothelial marker CD34 (Hycult Biotechnology, Uden, The Netherlands), glut-1 (Dakocytomation, Glostrup, Denmark; a marker for brain vasculature) and the pericyte marker α-smooth muscle actin (α-SM1; Sigma Chemical Co., Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands) according to previously published protocols (Kusters et al, 2002). To detect vascular permeability in the different tumours, sections were stained with HRPO-labelled anti-mouse IgG as described before (Kusters et al, 2002).

Results

Precontrast MR images showed little or no contrast between tumour and healthy brain tissue in all three tumour models (Figures 1, 2 and 3A and C). Following Gd-DTPA and USPIO administration, tumours could be easily identified (Figures 1, 2 and 3B and D). Each tumour model displayed a distinctive pattern of vascular morphology and enhancement following administration of contrast agents.

Figure 1
figure 1

(AD) Magnetic resonance images of mouse brain with a E34 glioma xenograft, acquired prior to (A and C) and following (B and D) administration of Gd-DTPA (B, gradient-echo images, TR/TE=400/6 ms, in-plane resolution=136 × 136 μm) and USPIO (D, spin-echo images, TR/TE=2000/9 ms, in-plane resolution=136 × 136 μm). In (B), the asteriscs (*) indicate the position of centre of the ROIs chosen for data analysis (see also Table 1) and the white circle indicates the size of the ROIs. (E and F) Immunohistochemical staining for glut-1 highlighting vessels (E) and immunostaining for extravasated mouse immunoglobulins (F). Note that vessel leakage is limited and heterogeneous. The arrow points at a tumour region where IgG has extravasated. Such regional leakage is in agreement with the heterogeneity in Gd-DTPA extravasation as shown in (B). Note that the Gd-DTPA-enhancing region underestimates the extent of the glioma in both hemispheres (compare B and D).

Figure 2
figure 2

(AD) Magnetic resonance images of mouse brain with Mel57-VEGF-A165 tumour, acquired prior to (A and C) and following administration of Gd-DTPA (B) and USPIO (D). The imaging parameters are the same as in Figure 1. From the image shown in the figure, three ROIs (labelled a, b and c) were analysed. (E and F) Immunostainings for pericytes (E) and extravasated IgGs (F) of a lesion in a section matched with the MRI slice. Note the highly dilatated tumour vasculature and the enormous amount of extravasated IgG.

Figure 3
figure 3

(AD) Magnetic resonance images of mouse brain with a U87 tumour, acquired prior to (A and C) and following administration of Gd-DTPA (B) and USPIO (D), with the same imaging parameters as in Figure 1. (E and F) Immunohistochemical staining for glut-1 (E), highlighting vessels and an immunostaining for extravasated mouse immunoglobulins (F) confirm the contrast-enhanced MRI findings of high tumour blood volume and vessel leakage.

Following Gd-DTPA administration, all tumours were hyperintense indicating Gd-DTPA extravasation. This correlated well with the vascular permeability in the tumours, as assessed by anti-IgG staining (compare panels F in Figures 1, 2 and 3). Following administration of USPIO, the E34 glioma showed high values of ΔR2 and ΔR2* throughout the tumour (Figure 1D and Table 1). The Mel57-VEGF-A165 metastases appeared as black spots and showed an expansive growth pattern (Figure 2D–F), with very high values of ΔR2 and ΔR2* (Table 1). Interestingly, this correlated well with the presence of highly dilated vessels (see α-SM1 staining in Figure 2E). The U87 tumours were characterised by a ring-like structure (Figure 3D), with relatively low ΔR2 and ΔR2* values in the core and very high ΔR2 and ΔR2* values in the peritumoral region. The values of ΔR2 and ΔR2* were also measured in healthy brain regions (cortex: ΔR2=5±2 s−1 and ΔR2*=21±9 s−1; striatum: ΔR2=9±3 s−1 and ΔR2*=36±10 s−1). The macrovascular blood volume map of Mel57-VEGF-A165 tumours is shown in Figure 4A. In Figure 4B, the corresponding gradient-echo images are shown. A high threshold for ΔR2* was used in the tumour areas (region inside the box). Outside the tumour region, a low cutoff threshold for ΔR2* is used to maximise the contrast between striatum (ROI indicated by the horizontal arrow) and cortex (ROI indicated by the vertical arrow, Figure 4B). For clarity, these two ROIs are drawn only on the gradient-echo image.

Table 1 Mean and standard deviation of ΔR2 and ΔR2*
Figure 4
figure 4

Pixel-by-pixel ΔR2* map of murine brain with Mel57-VEGF-A165 metastases (A). Reference gradient-echo image post-USPIO is shown in (B). The ΔR2* map is displayed with a high cutoff threshold in the tumour areas (region inside the box) and a low cutoff threshold outside tumour regions, to better visualise the differences in regional blood volume between brain regions that do not include tumour. An example of two ROIs chosen for ΔR2* and ΔR2 quantitation (see Table 1) in healthy brain regions – in the striatum (indicated by the horizontal arrow) and in the cortex (indicated by the vertical arrow) – is shown in the reference gradient-echo image.

Discussion

The ability to noninvasively detect aberrant vasculature is especially crucial for detection and delineation of brain tumours. In this study, we demonstrate that MR-based imaging of blood volume has important added value, as tumour vessels may be dilated in the absence of notable hyperpermeability, and hence may be better visualised by blood volume imaging. Specifically, in addition to qualitative assessment of vascular volume, which can be done by visually evaluating the change in signal intensity following USPIO, a quantitative assessment of blood volume can be performed by calculating ΔR2*. This allows for an objective comparison of vascular volumes of different tumours and also allows performance of longitudinal studies to assess, for example, treatment efficacy. An important part in the MR assessment of brain tumours in the clinic is the venous application of Gd-DTPA to detect blood–brain barrier leakage due to hyperpermeable tumour vessels. This results in interstitial Gd-DTPA accumulation, which can be vizualised on T1-weighted images. However, as brain tumours often show infiltrative growth without this leakage, no Gd-DTPA enhancement on T1-weighted MRI is then observed. In these cases, it is possible to use hyperintense lesions seen on T2-weighted MRI without contrast agent to characterise the tumour extent, but as oedema is also hyperintense on these images, tumour spread may be overestimated, and also underestimation by T2-weighted MRI has been reported (Pirzkall et al, 2001; Stadlbauer et al, 2004). In a few studies, it has been shown that T2*-weighted MR imaging after USPIO administration can have added value in the characterisation of human Gd-enhancing tumours.

In all tumour models used in this study, little contrast between healthy tissue and tumours was present in both T2- and T1-weighted images, with the specific acquisition timing used to obtain these images. Gadolinium-DTPA and USPIO contrast-enhanced MRI allowed not only detection of the tumours but also a more detailed characterisation of their vasculature. Overall, Mel57-VEGF-A165 tumours were characterised by higher blood volume than the E34 and U87 glioma xenografts. U87 tumours displayed higher blood volumes in the tumour rim than in the core. Again, we were able to confirm the MRI results with immunohistochemical stainings.

As Gd-DTPA and USPIO imaging were performed on the same mice, we were able to spatially correlate enhancement patterns of both contrast agents in the respective tumour models. It is well established that vascular volume and vascular permeability are among the best markers for in vivo tumour detection by MRI (Dennie et al, 1998; Su et al, 1998; Le Duc et al, 1999; Tropres et al, 2001; Turetschek et al, 2001; Verhoye et al, 2002; Bremer et al, 2003; Pathak et al, 2003; Robinson et al, 2003; van Laarhoven et al, 2006). It is generally assumed that tumours trigger angiogenesis or recruit blood vessels from the local vasculature, and, as a consequence, have increased local blood volumes. However, tumour cells may infiltrate healthy tissue and co-opt the pre-existing vasculature, a situation of particular importance in brain tumours (Kusters et al, 2002; Leenders et al, 2003). When this phenomenon occurs in the absence of angiogenesis or vascular alterations, this will result in a local decrease of blood volume, relative to surrounding healthy tissue. We previously showed that, upon USPIO administration, this decrease in blood volume translates into hyperintense voxels as compared to the surrounding tissue (Leenders et al, 2003). Thus, whether angiogenic or infiltrative, tumours have blood volumes that are distinct from the blood volume in adjacent normal tissue. These differences can be detected using blood-pool contrast agents such as USPIOs. Also, in light of our previous studies that showed that anti-VEGF treatment of brain tumours resulted in undetectability using Gd-DTPA MR imaging (due to restoration of the blood–brain barrier (Leenders et al, 2004; Claes et al, 2008)), USPIO imaging may be an attractive avenue to delineate brain tumours and evaluate antiangiogenic therapy.

For blood volume assessment of the macrovasculature and microvasculature, T2*-weighted gradient-echo and T2-weighted spin-echo images, respectively, need to be acquired prior to and following administration of USPIO. As shown in this study, the vascular morphology of the tumour is best visualised on post-USPIO gradient-echo images. Due to its high transverse relaxivity (100 mM−1 s−1, at 7 T (Gambarota et al, 2006)), USPIO provides an extremely high sensitivity to alterations in local tissue blood volume; as a result, it generates a high signal contrast in T2*-weighted images between regions of different blood volume. With respect to ΔR2, for typical USPIO concentrations employed in in vivo studies, only minor signal dephasing (and thus small ΔR2) originates in spin-echo images following USPIO administration (Le Duc et al, 1999; Gambarota et al, 2006). On the other hand, ΔR2 changes are sensitive to the small vasculature network, and therefore ΔR2 could be exploited for characterisation of the tumour microvasculature (Kennan et al, 1994; Weisskoff et al, 1994; Dennie et al, 1998; Le Duc et al, 1999). However, to detect USPIO-induced signal dephasing in spin-echo acquisitions, long echo times (100 ms) need to be employed, at the expense of the image SNR.

In the current study, all tumour models displayed vessel leakage, albeit at different degrees. Leakage of Gd-DTPA from tumour vessels into the interstitium is however not restricted to the tumour interstitium but can extent into the surrounding normal tissue. This obviously precludes an accurate estimation of tumour edges. As tumour (and edge) detection rely on factors that include (i) the signal intensity contrast between the lesion and peritumoral, non-neoplastic tissue and (ii) the spatial resolution of the MR image, USPIO (R2 relaxivity 100 mM−1 s−1) has the advantage over Gd-DTPA (R1 relaxivity 5 mM−1 s−1) of potentially improving both (i) and (ii).

In conclusion, detailed characterisation of the tumour vasculature by imaging vascular leakage and vascular volume provides a better understanding of the complex mechanisms associated with tumour development. Gadolinium-DTPA and USPIO contrast-enhanced MRI allow not only the detection of tumours but also characterisation of their vasculature, which is essential for diagnostic purposes and to assess efficacy of, for example, antiangiogenic therapy. Tumours from the three tumour models displayed three distinctive vascular morphologies, which were best assessed on post-USPIO gradient-echo images. The results of this study indicate that USPIO-induced ΔR2* values are highly sensitive to small changes in regional blood volume. Thus USPIO imaging may be a very attractive alternative to Gd-DTPA imaging and will at least have added value, especially for detection and delineation of diffuse infiltrative brain tumours.