Clinical Study

British Journal of Cancer (2005) 93, 1098–1105. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602836 www.bjcancer.com
Published online 18 October 2005

A new simplified comorbidity score as a prognostic factor in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: description and comparison with the Charlson's index

B Colinet1,3, W Jacot1, D Bertrand1, S Lacombe2, M-C Bozonnat2, J-P Daurès2 and J-L Pujol1,2 for the oncoLR health network

  1. 1Thoracic Oncology Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
  2. 2Department of Statistics and Epidemiology, University Institute for Clinical Research, Hôpital Universitaire Arnaud de Villeneuve, France

Correspondence: J-L Pujol, E-mail: jl-pujol@chu-montpellier.fr

3Current address: Respiratory Diseases Unit, Hôpital Saint Joseph, 6, rue de la Duchère, B-6060, Gilly, Belgium

Received 21 June 2005; Revised 15 September 2005; Accepted 16 September 2005; Published online 18 October 2005.

Top

Abstract

Treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) might take into account comorbidities as an important variable. The aim of this study was to generate a new simplified comorbidity score (SCS) and to determine whether or not it improves the possibility of predicting prognosis of NSCLC patients. A two-step methodology was used. Step 1: An SCS was developed and its prognostic value was compared with classical prognostic determinants in the outcome of 735 previously untreated NSCLC patients. Step 2: the SCS reliability as a prognostic determinant was tested in a different population of 136 prospectively accrued NSCLC patients with a formal comparison between SCS and the classical Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Prognosis was analysed using both univariate and multivariate (Cox model) statistics. The SCS summarised the following variables: tobacco consumption, diabetes mellitus and renal insufficiency (respective weightings 7, 5 and 4), respiratory, neoplastic and cardiovascular comorbidities and alcoholism (weighting=1 for each item). In step 1, aside from classical variables such as age, stage of the disease and performance status, SCS was a statistically significant prognostic variable in univariate analyses. In the Cox model weight loss, stage grouping, performance status and SCS were independent determinants of a poor outcome. There was a trend towards statistical significance for age (P=0.08) and leucocytes count (P=0.06). In Step 2, both SCS and well-known prognostic variables were found as significant determinants in univariate analyses. There was a trend towards a negative prognostic effect for CCI. In multivariate analysis, stage grouping, performance status, histology, leucocytes, lymphocytes, lactate dehydrogenase, CYFRA 21-1 and SCS were independent determinants of a poor prognosis. CCI was removed from the Cox model. In conclusion, the SCS, constructed as an independent prognostic factor in a large NSCLC patient population, is validated in another prospective population and appears more informative than the CCI in predicting NSCLC patient outcome.

Keywords:

non-small-cell lung cancer, comorbidities, prognosis

Top

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated