Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the superiority of the American Spinal Injury Association motor level (ML) and upper extremity motor score (UEMS) to the neurological level (NL) in determining self care function in motor complete tetraplegia. Fifty subjects with traumatic motor complete tetraplegia, NL C4–C8, were evaluated at admission and 12 months post injury. At both time periods NL, ML, and UEMS were determined. At 12 months, reported ability to perform six feeding activities of the Quadriplegia Index of Function (QIF) were documented. Spearman correlations of the NL, BML, WML, UEMS, and feeding QIF scores were conducted, and results were compared with t tests for significant differences. Both the best and worst ML were more highly correlated to the UEMS than was the NL (0.96 and 0.96 vs 0.66, P < 0.001). The best and worst ML were more highly correlated to the QIF feeding score than was the NL (0.74 and 0.72 vs 0.56, P < 0.05). The UEMS had the highest correlation to the QIF feeding score, 0.78. These results suggest that the NL is an imprecise descriptor of the impairment in SCI, and is therefore a poor predictor of the resultant disability. The ML and the UEMS better reflect the severity of impairment and disability after motor complete tetraplegia.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Long C, Lawton E B . Functional significance of spinal cord lesion level. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1955; 46: 249–255.
Frankel H L et al. The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. Paraplegia 1969; 7: 179–192.
American Spinal Injury Association. Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. ASIA: Chicago, 1992, pp 1–26.
Ditunno J F . New spinal cord injury standards. Paraplegia 1992; 30: 90–91.
Michaelis L S . International inquiry on neurological terminology and prognosis in paraplegia and tetraplegia. Paraplegia 1969; 7: 1–5.
Stover S L, Fine P R (eds). Spinal Cord Injury: The Facts and Figures. The University of Alabama at Birmingham: Birmingham, Alabama.
Welch R D, Lobley S J, O'Sullivan S B, Freed M M . Functional independence in quadriplegia: critical levels. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67: 235–240.
Yarkony G M et al. Rehabilitation outcomes in complete C5 quadriplegia. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 1: 73–6.
Yarkony G M, Roth E J, Heinemann A W, Lovell L . Rehabilitation outcomes in C6 tetraplegia. Paraplegia 1988; 26: 177–185.
Woolsey R M . Rehabilitation outcome following spinal cord injury. Arch Neurol 1985; 42: 116–9.
Staas W E et al. Rehabilitation of the spinal cord injured patient. In: DeLisa JA (ed). Rehabilitation Medicine: Principles and Practice. JB Lippincott: Philadelphia, 1988, pp 635–659.
Donovan W H . Spinal Cord Injury. In: Stolov WC, Clowers MR (eds). Handbook of Severe Disability. United States Department of Education, Rehabilitation Services Administration: Washington, 1981.
Freed M M . Traumatic and congenital lesions of the spinal cord. In: Kottke FJ, Stillwell GJ, Lehmann JF, (eds). Krusen's Handbook of Physical Medicine. WB Saunders: Philadelphia, 1982, pp 643–673.
Ditunno J F, Graziani V . Motor recovery and functional prognosis in spinal cord injury. Rehabil Rep 1989; 5: 1–4.
Waters R L, Adkins R H, Yakura J S, Sie I . Motor and sensory recovery following complete tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 242–47.
Zafonte R D, Demangone D A, Herbison G J, Ditunno J F . Daily self-care in quadriplegic subjects. NeuroRehabil 1991; 1: 17–24.
Ota T et al. Disability in patients with spinal cord injury: measured by the Functional Independence Measure (abstract). Proceedings of the Seventh World Congress of the International Rehabilitation Medicine Association, Washington DC, April, 1994.
Gresham G E et al. The Quadriplegia Index of Function (QIF): sensitivity and reliability demonstrated in a study of thirty quadriplegic patients. Paraplegia 1986; 24: 38–44.
American Spinal Injury Association. Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Injury Patients. ASIA: Chicago, 1987.
Guilford J P, Fruchter B . Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1978, p 164.
Ditunno J F, Cohen M E, Formal C S, Whiteneck G G . Functional outcomes in spinal cord injury. In: Stover SL, DeLisa JA, Whiteneck GG (eds). Spinal Cord Injury: Clinical Outcomes from the Model Systems. Aspen Publishers: Gaithersburg, Maryland, 1995.
Maynard F, Karunas R, Tate D . Importance of neurologic impairment following spinal cord injury for rehabilitation program evaluation outcomes. In: ASIA Sixteenth Annual Scientific Meeting, Abstracts Digest, May, 1990.
Iizuka H, Kadoya S . MR images—Neurological correlations in traumatic central cord syndrome. J Neurotrauma 1993; 10 (Suppl 1): S219.
Ejeskar A, Dahllof A, vonHofsten M . The influence of tactile gnosis on functional result after reconstructive surgery in tetraplegic patients. Proceedings of the International Medical Society of Paraplegia Annual Meeting, May, 1993, Gent, Belgium p. 55.
Maissel G, Cohen M . Pin sensation is significant for self care function in quadriplegia. J Am Paraplegia Soc 1993; 16: 86.
Johnston M V, Keith R A, Hinderer S R . Measurement standards for interdisciplinary medical rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: S3–S23.
Eschbach K S, Herbison G J, Ditunno J F . Sensory root level recovery in Frankel A quadriplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 618–22.
Ditunno J F et al. Wrist extensor recovery in traumatic quadriplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987; 68: 287–90.
Stauffer E S . Neurologic recovery following injuries to cervical spinal cord and nerve roots. Spine 1984; 9: 532.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marino, R., Rider-Foster, D., Maissel, G. et al. Superiority of motor level over single neurological level in categorizing tetraplegia. Spinal Cord 33, 510–513 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1995.111
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1995.111