Correction to: Communications Earth & Environment https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01334-6, published online 3 April 2024
The original version of this article contained an error in Fig. 2, in which the “high benefits” estimate was −0.033 and standard error 0.007; the actual estimate is −0.006 and standard error 0.007. This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Scott-Buechler, C., Cain, B., Osman, K. et al. Author Correction: Communities conditionally support deployment of direct air capture for carbon dioxide removal in the United States. Commun Earth Environ 5, 208 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01384-w
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01384-w
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
