Abstract
Phospholipids are key components of cellular membranes and are emerging as important functional regulators of different membrane proteins, including pentameric ligand-gated ion channels (pLGICs). Here, we take advantage of the prokaryote channel ELIC (Erwinia ligand-gated ion channel) as a model to understand the determinants of phospholipid interactions in this family of receptors. A high-resolution structure of ELIC in a lipid-bound state reveals a phospholipid site at the lower half of pore-forming transmembrane helices M1 and M4 and at a nearby site for neurosteroids, cholesterol or general anesthetics. This site is shaped by an M4-helix kink and a Trp–Arg–Pro triad that is highly conserved in eukaryote GABAA/C and glycine receptors. A combined approach reveals that M4 is intrinsically flexible and that M4 deletions or disruptions of the lipid-binding site accelerate desensitization in ELIC, suggesting that lipid interactions shape the agonist response. Our data offer a structural context for understanding lipid modulation in pLGICs.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary information files. Atomic coordinates and structure factors have been deposited with the Protein Data Bank under accession numbers 6HJX, 6HJY and 6HK0 for ELIC 7′C+Nb72, ELIC Δ8+Nb72 and ELIC F16′S, respectively.
Code availability
Any code or mathematical algorithm used in this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.
References
Norimatsu, Y., Hasegawa, K., Shimizu, N. & Toyoshima, C. Protein-phospholipid interplay revealed with crystals of a calcium pump. Nature 545, 193–198 (2017).
Dawaliby, R. et al. Allosteric regulation of G protein-coupled receptor activity by phospholipids. Nat. Chem. Biol. 12, 35–39 (2016).
Martens, C. et al. Lipids modulate the conformational dynamics of a secondary multidrug transporter. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 744–751 (2016).
She, J. et al. Structural insights into the voltage and phospholipid activation of the mammalian TPC1 channel. Nature 556, 130–134 (2018).
Laganowsky, A. et al. Membrane proteins bind lipids selectively to modulate their structure and function. Nature 510, 172–175 (2014).
Whorton, M. R. & Mackinnon, R. Crystal structure of the mammalian GIRK2 K+ channel and gating regulation by G proteins, PIP2, and sodium. Cell 147, 199–208 (2011).
Heidmann, T., Sobel, A., Popot, J. L. & Changeux, J. P. Reconstitution of a functional acetylcholine receptor. Conservation of the conformational and allosteric transitions and recovery of the permeability response; role of lipids. Eur. J. Biochem. 110, 35–55 (1980).
daCosta, C. J. B. et al. Anionic lipids allosterically modulate multiple nicotinic acetylcholine receptor conformational equilibria. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 33841–33849 (2009).
daCosta, C. J. B., Dey, L., Therien, J. P. D. & Baenziger, J. E. A distinct mechanism for activating uncoupled nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Nat. Chem. Biol. 9, 701–707 (2013).
Barrantes, F. J. Phylogenetic conservation of protein-lipid motifs in pentameric ligand-gated ion channels. Biochim Biophys. Acta 1848, 1796–1805 (2015).
Baenziger, J. E., Hénault, C. M., Therien, J. P. D. & Sun, J. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-lipid interactions: mechanistic insight and biological function. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1848, 1806–1817 (2015).
Cory-Wright, J. et al. Aromatic residues in the fourth transmembrane-spanning helix M4 are important for GABAρ receptor function. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 9, 284–290 (2018).
Haeger, S. et al. An intramembrane aromatic network determines pentameric assembly of Cys-loop receptors. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 90–98 (2010).
Hénault, C. M. et al. The role of the M4 lipid-sensor in the folding, trafficking, and allosteric modulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Neuropharmacology 96, 157–168 (2015).
Carswell, C. L. et al. Role of the fourth transmembrane α helix in the allosteric modulation of pentameric ligand-gated ion channels. Structure 23, 1655–1664 (2015).
Hénault, C. M., Juranka, P. F. & Baenziger, J. E. The M4 transmembrane α-helix contributes differently to both the maturation and function of two prokaryotic pentameric ligand-gated ion channels. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 25118–25128 (2015).
Mitra, A., Bailey, T. D. & Auerbach, A. L. Structural dynamics of the M4 transmembrane segment during acetylcholine receptor gating. Structure 12, 1909–1918 (2004).
Velisetty, P., Chalamalasetti, S. V. & Chakrapani, S. Structural basis for allosteric coupling at the membrane-protein interface in Gloeobacter violaceus ligand-gated ion channel (GLIC). J. Biol. Chem. 289, 3013–3025 (2014).
Basak, S., Schmandt, N., Gicheru, Y. & Chakrapani, S. Crystal structure and dynamics of a lipid-induced potential desensitized-state of a pentameric ligand-gated channel. eLife 6, e23886 (2017).
Lasalde, J. A. et al. Tryptophan substitutions at the lipid-exposed transmembrane segment M4 of Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor govern channel gating. Biochemistry 35, 14139–14148 (1996).
Bouzat, C., Roccamo, A. M., Garbus, I. & Barrantes, F. J. Mutations at lipid-exposed residues of the acetylcholine receptor affect its gating kinetics. Mol. Pharm. 54, 146–153 (1998).
Domville, J. A. & Baenziger, J. E. An allosteric link connecting the lipid-protein interface to the gating of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Sci. Rep. 8, 3898 (2018).
Carswell, C. L., Sun, J. & Baenziger, J. E. Intramembrane aromatic interactions influence the lipid sensitivities of pentameric ligand-gated ion channels. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 2496–2507 (2015).
Labriola, J. M. et al. Structural sensitivity of a prokaryotic pentameric ligand-gated ion channel to its membrane environment. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 11294–11303 (2013).
Bocquet, N. et al. X-ray structure of a pentameric ligand-gated ion channel in an apparently open conformation. Nature 457, 111–114 (2009).
Nury, H. et al. X-ray structures of general anaesthetics bound to a pentameric ligand-gated ion channel. Nature 469, 428–431 (2011).
Laverty, D. et al. Crystal structures of a GABAA-receptor chimera reveal new endogenous neurosteroid-binding sites. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24, 977–985 (2017).
Chen, Q. et al. Structural basis of neurosteroid anesthetic action on GABAA receptors. Nat. Commun. 9, 3972 (2018).
Miller, P. S. et al. Structural basis for GABAA receptor potentiation by neurosteroids. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24, 986–992 (2017).
Zhu, S. et al. Structure of a human synaptic GABAA receptor. Nature 559, 67–72 (2018).
Laverty, D. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the human α1β3γ2 GABAA receptor in a lipid bilayer. Nature 565, 516–520 (2019).
Manglik, A., Kobilka, B. K. & Steyaert, J. Nanobodies to study G protein-coupled receptor structure and function. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 57, 19–37 (2017).
Hilf, R. J. C. & Dutzler, R. X-ray structure of a prokaryotic pentameric ligand-gated ion channel. Nature 452, 375–379 (2008).
Du, J., Lü, W., Wu, S., Cheng, Y. & Gouaux, E. Glycine receptor mechanism elucidated by electron cryo-microscopy. Nature 526, 224–229 (2015).
Huang, X. et al. Crystal structures of human glycine receptor α3 bound to a novel class of analgesic potentiators. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24, 108–113 (2017).
Miller, P. S. & Aricescu, A. R. Crystal structure of a human GABAA receptor. Nature 512, 270–275 (2014).
Phulera, S. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the benzodiazepine-sensitive α1β1γ2S tri-heteromeric GABAA receptor in complex with GABA. eLife 7, 531 (2018).
Masiulis, S. et al. GABAA receptor signalling mechanisms revealed by structural pharmacology. Nature 565, 454–459 (2019).
Hibbs, R. E. & Gouaux, E. Principles of activation and permeation in an anion-selective Cys-loop receptor. Nature 474, 54–60 (2011).
Althoff, T., Hibbs, R. E., Banerjee, S. & Gouaux, E. X-ray structures of GluCl in apo states reveal a gating mechanism of Cys-loop receptors. Nature 512, 333–337 (2014).
Morales-Perez, C. L., Noviello, C. M. & Hibbs, R. E. X-ray structure of the human α4β2 nicotinic receptor. Nature 538, 411–415 (2016).
Walsh, R. M. et al. Structural principles of distinct assemblies of the human α4β2 nicotinic receptor. Nature 557, 261–265 (2018).
Gielen, M. & Corringer, P.-J. The dual-gate model for pentameric ligand-gated ion channels activation and desensitization. J. Physiol. 596, 1873–1902 (2018).
Zimmermann, I. & Dutzler, R. Ligand activation of the prokaryotic pentameric ligand-gated ion channel ELIC. PLoS Biol. 9, e1001101 (2011).
Gonzalez-Gutierrez, G. et al. Mutations that stabilize the open state of the Erwinia chrisanthemi ligand-gated ion channel fail to change the conformation of the pore domain in crystals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 6331–6336 (2012).
Chatterjee, A., Guo, J., Lee, H. S. & Schultz, P. G. A genetically encoded fluorescent probe in mammalian cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 12540–12543 (2013).
Spurny, R. et al. Pentameric ligand-gated ion channel ELIC is activated by GABA and modulated by benzodiazepines. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E3028–E3034 (2012).
Nys, M. et al. Allosteric binding site in a Cys-loop receptor ligand-binding domain unveiled in the crystal structure of ELIC in complex with chlorpromazine. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E6696–E6703 (2016).
Pardon, E. et al. A general protocol for the generation of nanobodies for structural biology. Nat. Protoc. 9, 674–693 (2014).
Kabsch, W. XDS. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 125–132 (2010).
Winn, M. D. et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 235–242 (2011).
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010).
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 (2010).
Smart, O. S. et al. Exploiting structure similarity in refinement: automated NCS and target-structure restraints in BUSTER. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 68, 368–380 (2012).
Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 12–21 (2010).
Cuello, L. G., Cortes, D. M. & Perozo, E. The gating cycle of a K+ channel at atomic resolution. eLife 6, 213 (2017).
Jo, S., Kim, T., Iyer, V. G. & Im, W. CHARMM-GUI: a web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM. J. Comput. Chem. 29, 1859–1865 (2008).
Phillips, J. C. et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1781–1802 (2005).
Brooks, B. R. et al. CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J. Comput. Chem. 30, 1545–1614 (2009).
Klauda, J. B. et al. Update of the CHARMM all-atom additive force field for lipids: validation on six lipid types. J. Phys. Chem. B. 114, 7830–7843 (2010).
Acknowledgements
We thank INSTRUCT-ERIC, part of the European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures and the Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO) for funding nanobody discovery (J.S.). We thank N. Buys and K. Willibal for technical assistance during nanobody discovery. SBO/IWT-project 1200261 and FWO-project G.0762.13 were awarded to J.S. and C.U. Additional support was from KU Leuven OT/13/095, C32/16/035 and C14/17/093 to C.U. We thank beamline staff at the Swiss Light Source and ESRF. J.E.B. was supported by a grant (113312) from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. G.B. was supported by research grant NIH P01GM55876-14A1. L.G.C. was supported by research grant NIH 2R01GM097159. Computational resources were provided by the National Science Foundation XSEDE program through allocation NSF-MCB110149 as well as the Rutgers Discovery Informatics Institute (G.B.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.M.H. designed, performed and analyzed Xenopus electrophysiological recordings. C.G. performed structure building and refinement. R.S. designed and performed protein purification, crystallization, X-ray data collection and structure determination, building and refinement. M.B. designed and performed protein purification, crystallization, cysteine crosslinking, mutagenesis, RNA transcription and analyzed data. A.E.-M. designed, performed and analyzed VCF recordings. J.L. supervised voltage clamp recordings, data analysis and acquired funding. D.B. designed, performed and analyzed HiClamp recordings. E.P. designed, performed and analyzed all aspects of nanobody production. G.E. performed structure validation and data analysis. K.W. contributed to all aspects of MD simulations. B.W.E. contributed to lipid vesicle recordings. L.G.C. designed, performed and analyzed lipid vesicle recordings and contributed funding. G.B. designed, performed, analyzed MD simulations and acquired funding. H.N. performed X-ray structure building and refinement. J.S. contributed to all aspects of nanobody production and acquired funding. J.E.B. supervised the project, performed experimental design, data analysis and acquired funding. C.U. supervised the project, performed experimental design, contributed to all aspects of X-ray crystallography and acquired funding. J.E.B. and C.U. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information
Supplementary Tables 1–5 and Supplementary Figures 1–11.
Supplementary Video 1
The video is a morph illustrating the conformational change of M4 in ELIC (side view). The structure in red represents the alternate conformation of M4.
Supplementary Video 2
The video is a morph illustrating the conformational change of M4 in ELIC for the transmembrane domain only (side view, left; top view, right). The structure in red represents the alternate conformation of M4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hénault, C.M., Govaerts, C., Spurny, R. et al. A lipid site shapes the agonist response of a pentameric ligand-gated ion channel. Nat Chem Biol 15, 1156–1164 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-019-0369-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-019-0369-4
This article is cited by
-
Lipid nanodisc scaffold and size alter the structure of a pentameric ligand-gated ion channel
Nature Communications (2024)
-
State-dependent binding of cholesterol and an anionic lipid to the muscle-type Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptor
Communications Biology (2024)
-
Anionic lipids unlock the gates of select ion channels in the pacemaker family
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (2022)
-
Tracking Membrane Protein Dynamics in Real Time
The Journal of Membrane Biology (2021)
-
Thermophoretic analysis of ligand-specific conformational states of the inhibitory glycine receptor embedded in copolymer nanodiscs
Scientific Reports (2020)