Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research Briefing
  • Published:

Could a shift in society’s conception of ‘honesty’ explain the spread of misinformation in the USA?

We identified two components of honesty — ‘belief speaking’ and ‘fact speaking’ — in public-facing communication by US politicians. For Republicans, belief speaking is strongly associated with the sharing of untrustworthy information. Fact speaking is associated with the sharing of more reliable information, irrespective of party affiliation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Development of belief speaking and fact speaking.

References

  1. Hahl, O., Kim, M. & Zuckerman Sivan, E. W. The authentic appeal of the lying demagogue: proclaiming the deeper truth about political illegitimacy. Am. Sociol. Rev. 83, 1–33 (2018). This paper introduces the idea that a ‘lying demagogue’ can be appealing to a constituency of voters.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lasser, J. et al. Social media sharing of low quality news sources by political elites. PNAS Nexus 1, pgac186 (2022). The article shows that the quality of information shared by Republican members of the US Congress has considerably deteriorated over the past decade.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper B., Cohen, T. R., Huppert, E. L., Levine, E. E. & Fleeson, W. Honest behavior: truth-seeking, belief-speaking and fostering understanding of truth in others. Acad. Manag. Ann. 17, https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2021.0209 (2023). This article introduces different components of honesty in the context of an organization.

  4. Lewandowsky, S. in Deliberate Ignorance: Choosing Not to Know (eds Hertwig, R. & Engel, C.) Ch. 7 (MIT Press, 2021). This article introduces two distinct ontologies of truth that map onto the two different conceptualizations of honesty that we investigate.

Download references

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This is a summary of: Lasser, J. et al. From alternative conceptions of honesty to alternative facts in communications by US politicians. Nat. Hum. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01691-w (2023).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Could a shift in society’s conception of ‘honesty’ explain the spread of misinformation in the USA?. Nat Hum Behav 7, 2062–2063 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01692-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01692-9

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing