Correction to: Nature Geoscience https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0109-5, published online 23 April 2018.

Here we report revised values for the carbon isotopic composition of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) (Table 1) and parameters calculated from revised values (Table 2). These values are updated to reflect new estimates of process blank carbon associated with the UV oxidation method of converting DOC to CO2 prior to graphitization and measurement at the National Ocean Sciences Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (NOSAMS) Facility. Revised blank mass and isotopic composition were determined by a retrospective investigation of secondary standards conducted by NOSAMS in 2018 (NOSAMS personal communication) after which corrected δ13C and Δ14C values were provided for previously measured samples with new facility accession numbers. Original and new accession numbers are provided in Table 1. Table 2 presents revised values for calculated parameters that were included in the manuscript. In both tables, revised values in bold are different from original values by more than the uncertainty reported in the original manuscript. Values in bold italics are values for which the difference between the original and revised values exceed the propagated uncertainty reported with revised data or calculations. In all cases, the revised data are similar enough to the original data that the interpretation of the DOC isotopic data does not change from the original manuscript.

Table 1 Updated carbon isotopic composition of DOC—measured values
Table 2 Updated carbon isotopic composition of DOC—calculated values

Table 1: For δ13C values, all samples except DOC from the deepest horizon at U1383C fall within the envelope of the originally reported uncertainty. Revised Δ14C values and radiocarbon ages fall outside the originally reported uncertainty, but the difference between the values is smaller than the revised uncertainty for all but bottom-water DOC. The average difference between original and reported radiocarbon values is 8‰ or 160 radiocarbon years (Table 1).

Calculated values were reported with propagated error and conservative assumptions in the original manuscript. Half of the revised estimates for age-corrected DOC Δ14C values were within the originally reported uncertainty. Of the three that were not, all fall within the uncertainty of revised values in Table 2. Estimates of the radiocarbon content of DOC removed in the crust changed modestly, well within the uncertainty that they were initially reported with.

Originally reported values can be directly compared with other published DOC Δ14C values measured at NOSAMS that were reported before the revised blank correction. Revised DOC Δ14C values can be compared with DOC Δ14C values measured at NOSAMS after 2019.

Original and revised carbon isotopic composition of DOC are available in BCO-DMO Data Repository for Project #650059: “Collaborative Research: A multidimensional approach to understanding microbial carbon cycling beneath the seafloor during cool hydrothermal circulation”, available at https://www.bco-dmo.org/project/650059.