Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Radioisotope chemistry

Doing away with radium’s proxies

Nature Chemistry volume 16, pages 147–148 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

Despite the growing clinical use of radium in cancer treatments, the fundamental chemistry of nature’s largest +2 cation remains largely unexplored. Now, structural analysis of a radium complex reveals that its behaviour cannot always be predicted from the chemistry of its closest nonradioactive congener, barium.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Surrogate elements cannot always adequately represent fast-decaying radioisotopes.

References

  1. Yamaguchi, A. et al. iScience 25, 104763 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bai, Z. et al. Inorg. Chem. 62, 8478–8481 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. White, F. D., Thiele, N. A., Simms, M. E. & Cary, S. K. Nat. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-023-01366-z (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Abou, D. S. et al. Chem. Sci. 12, 3733–3742 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Henriksen, G., Hoff, P. & Larsen, R. H. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 56, 667–671 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ivanov, A. S. et al. Chem. Comm. 58, 9938–9941 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown, P. L., Matyskin, A. V. & Ekberg, C. Radiochim. Acta 110, 505–513 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shannon, R. D. Acta Crystallogr. A 32, 751–767 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Twitter / X: @bioactinide

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Joshua J. Woods & Rebecca J. Abergel

  2. Departments of Nuclear Engineering and Chemistry, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Joshua J. Woods & Rebecca J. Abergel

Authors
  1. Joshua J. Woods
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rebecca J. Abergel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca J. Abergel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Woods, J.J., Abergel, R.J. Doing away with radium’s proxies. Nat. Chem. 16, 147–148 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-023-01426-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-023-01426-4

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing