Abstract
Molecules that covalently engage target proteins are widely used as activity-based probes and covalent drugs. The performance of these covalent inhibitors is, however, often compromised by the paradox of efficacy and risk, which demands a balance between reactivity and selectivity. The challenge is more evident when targeting protein–protein interactions owing to their low ligandability and undefined reactivity. Here we report sulfur(VI) fluoride exchange (SuFEx) in vitro selection, a general platform for high-throughput discovery of covalent inhibitors from trillions of SuFEx-modified oligonucleotides. With SuFEx in vitro selection, we identified covalent inhibitors that cross-link distinct residues of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein at its protein–protein interaction interface with the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. A separate suite of covalent inhibitors was isolated for the human complement C5 protein. In both cases, we observed a clear disconnection between binding affinity and cross-linking reactivity, indicating that direct search for the aimed reactivity—as enabled by SuFEx in vitro selection—is vital for discovering covalent inhibitors of high selectivity and potency.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The authors declare that data supporting the findings of this study are available within this article and the Supplementary information. The NGS raw data (fastq) for SuFEx in vitro selection are available from figshare via https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.23259986.v1 (ref. 55). The protein sequences and structures are accessible from Protein Data Bank (PDB), with entries 7A92, 6ZGI, 6ZGG and 6RQJ for S1/RBD, S protein trimer (close), S protein trimer (open) and hC5, respectively. Source Data are provided with this paper.
References
Heal, W. P., Dang, T. H. T. & Tate, E. W. Activity-based probes: discovering new biology and new drug targets. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 246–257 (2011).
Wu, L. et al. An overview of activity-based probes for glycosidases. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 53, 25–36 (2019).
Singh, J., Petter, R. C., Baillie, T. A. & Whitty, A. The resurgence of covalent drugs. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 10, 307–317 (2011).
Abdeldayem, A., Raouf, Y. S., Constantinescu, S. N., Moriggl, R. & Gunning, P. T. Advances in covalent kinase inhibitors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 2617–2687 (2020).
Pettinger, J., Jones, K. & Cheeseman, M. D. Lysine-targeting covalent inhibitors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 15200–15209 (2017).
Maurais, A. J. & Weerapana, E. Reactive-cysteine profiling for drug discovery. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 50, 29–36 (2019).
Narayanan, A. & Jones, L. H. Sulfonyl fluorides as privileged warheads in chemical biology. Chem. Sci. 6, 2650–2659 (2015).
Lagoutte, R., Patouret, R. & Winssinger, N. Covalent inhibitors: an opportunity for rational target selectivity. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 39, 54–63 (2017).
Moore, A. R., Rosenberg, S. C., McCormick, F. & Malek, S. RAS-targeted therapies: Is the undruggable drugged? Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 19, 533–552 (2020).
Chen, S. et al. Identification of highly selective covalent inhibitors by phage display. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 490–498 (2021).
Tivon, Y., Falcone, G. & Deiters, A. Protein labeling and crosslinking by covalent aptamers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 15899–15904 (2021).
Sharpe, A. H. & Pauken, K. E. The diverse functions of the PD1 inhibitory pathway. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 18, 153–167 (2018).
Lan, J. et al. Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor. Nature 581, 215–220 (2020).
Ueda, T. et al. Enhanced suppression of a protein–protein interaction in cells using small-molecule covalent inhibitors based on an N-acyl-N-alkyl sulfonamide warhead. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 4766–4774 (2021).
Gambini, L. et al. Covalent inhibitors of protein–protein interactions targeting lysine, tyrosine, or histidine residues. J. Med. Chem. 62, 5616–5627 (2019).
Li, Q. K. et al. Developing covalent protein drugs via proximity-enabled reactive therapeutics. Cell 182, 85–97 (2020).
Han, Y. et al. Covalently engineered protein minibinders with enhanced neutralization efficacy against escaping SARS-CoV-2 variants. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 5702–5707 (2022).
Wang, N. & Wang, L. Genetically encoding latent bioreactive amino acids and the development of covalent protein drugs. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 66, 102106 (2022).
Tabuchi, Y., Yang, J. & Taki, M. Inhibition of thrombin activity by a covalent-binding aptamer and reversal by the complementary strand antidote. Chem. Commun. 57, 2483–2486 (2021).
Cohen, M. S., Zhang, C., Shokat, K. M. & Taunton, J. Structural bioinformatics-based design of selective, irreversible kinase inhibitors. Science 308, 1318–1321 (2005).
Bartel, D. P. & Szostak, J. W. Isolation of new ribozymes from a large pool of random sequences. Science 261, 1411–1418 (1993).
Chapman, K. B. & Szostak, J. W. In vitro selection of catalytic RNAs. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 4, 618–622 (1994).
Liu, M., Chang, D. R. & Li, Y. F. Discovery and biosensing applications of diverse RNA-cleaving DNAzymes. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 2273–2283 (2017).
McGhee, C. E., Loh, K. Y. & Lu, Y. DNAzyme sensors for detection of metal ions in the environment and imaging them in living cells. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 45, 191–201 (2017).
Silverman, S. K. Pursuing DNA catalysts for protein modification. Acc. Chem. Res. 48, 1369–1379 (2015).
Zhou, W. H., Saran, R. & Liu, J. W. Metal sensing by DNA. Chem. Rev. 117, 8272–8325 (2017).
Wang, Y. J., Nguyen, K., Spitale, R. C. & Chaput, J. C. A biologically stable DNAzyme that efficiently silences gene expression in cells. Nat. Chem. 13, 319–326 (2021).
Wang, Y. Y. et al. An RNA-cleaving threose nucleic acid enzyme capable of single point mutation discrimination. Nat. Chem. 14, 350–359 (2022).
Dunn, M. R., Jimenez, R. M. & Chaput, J. C. Analysis of aptamer discovery and technology. Nat. Rev. Chem. 1, 0076 (2017).
Zhou, J. H. & Rossi, J. Aptamers as targeted therapeutics: current potential and challenges. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 16, 181–202 (2017).
Brighty, G. J. et al. Using sulfuramidimidoyl fluorides that undergo sulfur(VI) fluoride exchange for inverse drug discovery. Nat. Chem. 12, 906–913 (2020).
He, Q., Johnston, J. & Zeitlinger, J. ChIP-nexus enables improved detection of in vivo transcription factor binding footprints. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 395–401 (2015).
Fidanza, J. A., Ozaki, H. & Mclaughlin, L. W. Site-specific labeling of DNA sequences containing phosphorothioate diesters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 5509–5517 (1992).
Xiao, L., Gu, C. & Xiang, Y. Orthogonal activation of RNA-cleaving DNAzymes in live cells by reactive oxygen species. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 14167–14172 (2019).
Gu, C. M. et al. Chemical synthesis of stimuli-responsive guide RNA for conditional control of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing. Chem. Sci. 12, 9934–9945 (2021).
Dong, J. J., Krasnova, L., Finn, M. G. & Sharpless, K. B. Sulfur(VI) fluoride exchange (SuFEx): another good reaction for click chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 9430–9448 (2014).
Zheng, Q. H. et al. SuFEx-enabled, agnostic discovery of covalent inhibitors of human neutrophil elastase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 18808–18814 (2019).
Morgan, B. P. & Harris, C. L. Complement, a target for therapy in inflammatory and degenerative diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 14, 857–877 (2015).
Hamady, M., Walker, J. J., Harris, J. K., Gold, N. J. & Knight, R. Error-correcting barcoded primers for pyrosequencing hundreds of samples in multiplex. Nat. Methods 5, 235–237 (2008).
Liu, X. et al. Neutralizing aptamers block S/RBD-ACE2 interactions and prevent host cell infection. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 10273–10278 (2021).
Peinetti, A. S. et al. Direct detection of human adenovirus or SARS-CoV-2 with ability to inform infectivity using DNA aptamer-nanopore sensors. Sci. Adv. 7, eabh2848 (2021).
Schmitz, A. et al. A SARS-CoV-2 spike binding DNA aptamer that inhibits pseudovirus infection by an RBD-independent mechanism. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 10279–10285 (2021).
Zhang, Z. et al. High-affinity dimeric aptamers enable the rapid electrochemical detection of wild-type and B.1.1.7 SARS-CoV-2 in unprocessed saliva. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 24266–24274 (2021).
Romaniuk, P. J. & Eckstein, F. A study of the mechanism of T4 DNA polymerase with diastereomeric phosphorothioate analogs of deoxyadenosine triphosphate. J. Biol. Chem. 257, 7684–7688 (1982).
Iwamoto, N. et al. Control of phosphorothioate stereochemistry substantially increases the efficacy of antisense oligonucleotides. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 845–851 (2017).
Watanabe, Y., Allen, J. D., Wrapp, D., McLellan, J. S. & Crispin, M. Site-specific glycan analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 spike. Science 369, 330–333 (2020).
Wrobel, A. G. et al. SARS-CoV-2 and bat RaTG13 spike glycoprotein structures inform on virus evolution and furin-cleavage effects. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 763–767 (2020).
Xiong, X. L. et al. A thermostable, closed SARS-CoV-2 spike protein trimer. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 934–941 (2020).
Cueno, M. E. & Imai, K. Structural comparison of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein relative to other human-infecting coronaviruses. Front. Med. 7, 594439 (2020).
Mukherjee, H. et al. A study of the reactivity of S(VI)-F containing warheads with nucleophilic amino-acid side chains under physiological conditions. Org. Biomol. Chem. 15, 9685–9695 (2017).
Nie, J. H. et al. Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody by a pseudotyped virus-based assay. Nat. Protoc. 15, 3699–3715 (2020).
Biesecker, G., Dihel, L., Enney, K. & Bendele, R. A. Derivation of RNA aptamer inhibitors of human complement C5. Immunopharmacology 42, 219–230 (1999).
Sefah, K. et al. In vitro selection with artificial expanded genetic information systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 1449–1454 (2014).
Shangguan, D. et al. Aptamers evolved from live cells as effective molecular probes for cancer study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103, 11838–11843 (2006).
Xiang, Y. NGS raw data of SuFEx in vitro selection. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.23259986.v1 (2023).
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant nos. 2021YFA1200900 to Y.X. and A.T., 2022YFE0102400 to Y.X., and 2018YFA0902601 to C.Z.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 22074076 to Y.X., 21621003 to Y.X., 51973112 to C.Z., and 52225302 to C.Z.) and Tsinghua University Dushi Program (grant no. 20221080024 to Y.X.). We are grateful for the instrument assistance from the Analysis Center of Tsinghua University. We thank the support of all staffs from the Wuhan National Biosafety Level 3 Laboratory of Wuhan Institute of Virology, CAS. The figures in this article were created using BioRender (https://www.biorender.com/) and are licensed for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Z.Q., K.Z., C.G., A.T. and Y.X. conceived and designed the SuFEx in vitro selection. Z.Q. and Y.X. performed S1 SuFEx in vitro selection. Z.Q. and K.Z. performed RBD and hC5 SuFEx in vitro selection. Z.Q. and K.Z. synthesized the SuFEx-modified oligonucleotides, performed the PAGE characterization and analysed the results. Y.Z. performed LC–MS/MS measurements and analysed the results for cross-linking site assignment. P.H. and H.W. designed and performed the SARS-CoV-2 neutralization assays, and analysed the results. Z.Q. and Y.X. designed and performed the pseudovirus neutralization assays, and analysed the results. X.Z., M.X., Y.F. and C.Z. designed and performed the hC5-induced haemolysis inhibition assays, and analysed the results. Z.Q., K.Z. and Y.X. wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the paper. Z.Q. and K.Z. contributed equally to this work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Chemistry thanks Jiajia Dong, Seiya Kitamura and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figs. 1–22 and Tables 1–3.
Supplementary Data 1
Oligonucleotide sequences used.
Supplementary Data 2
Raw data for plots in Supplementary Information.
Supplementary Data 3
NGS reads for all selections.
Source data
Source Data Fig. 2
Uncropped gels in Fig. 2c–e.
Source Data Fig. 4
Uncropped gels in Fig. 4b–f.
Source Data Fig. 5
Raw numerical/statistical data in Fig. 5b,d,e.
Source Data Fig. 5
The raw fluorescence and bright field images in Fig. 5c.
Source Data Fig. 6
Uncropped gels in Fig. 6c,d.
Source Data Fig. 6
Raw numerical/statistical data in Fig. 6e.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Qin, Z., Zhang, K., He, P. et al. Discovering covalent inhibitors of protein–protein interactions from trillions of sulfur(VI) fluoride exchange-modified oligonucleotides. Nat. Chem. 15, 1705–1714 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-023-01304-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-023-01304-z