Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42092-x, published online 28 November 2023

The original version of this article contained an error in the “Results” section. A sentence incorrectly read ‘At the group level, the mean regression coefficient (across subjects) was significantly different from 0 (two sample t test, t = 4.77, p < 0.001)’ instead of ‘At the group level, the mean regression coefficient (across subjects) was significantly different from 0 (one-sample t test, two tailed, t = 4.77, p < 0.001).’ The original article has been corrected.