Abstract
Molecular recognition and self-assembly are often mediated by intermolecular forces involving aromatic π-systems. Despite the ubiquity of such interactions in biological systems and in the design of functional materials, the elusive nature of aromatic π interaction results in that they have been seldom used as a design element for promoting challenging chemical reactions. Described here is a well-engineered catalytic system into which non-covalent π interactions are directly incorporated. Enabled by a lone pair-π interaction and a π-π stacking interaction operating collectively, efficient chiral recognition is successfully achieved in the long-pursued dihydroxylation-based kinetic resolution. Density functional theory calculations shed light on the crucial role played by the lone pair-π interaction between the carbonyl oxygen of the cinchona alkaloid ligand and the electron-deficient phthalazine π moiety of the substrate in the stereoselectivity-determining transition states. This discovery serves as a proof-of-principle example showing how the weak non-covalent π interactions, if ingeniously designed, could be a powerful guide in attaining highly enantioselective catalysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Attractive non-covalent interactions (NCIs), such as hydrogen bond, ion pair, and van der Waals forces, have been integral to biocatalysis, and their application to chemical catalysis has been accelerated over the past two decades1,2,3,4,5,6. Prominent examples of the latter include thiourea-catalyzed asymmetric Strecker reaction7, chiral ion pair-catalyzed fluorination reaction8, and chiral phosphoric acid-catalyzed Ugi reaction9. Particularly, NCIs involving π systems have drawn increasing attention as they underpin many important structural phenomena in molecular biology and materials science10,11,12. These include π–π13,14,15, XH–π16,17, cation–π18,19,20,21, anion–π22,23 and lone-pair–π interactions24,25,26 (Fig. 1a). Recent advances in theoretical and computational chemistry have now reached the stage at which non-covalent π interactions can be modeled accurately, thus often attributed to when rationalizing the observed reactivity and selectivity in a variety of chemical transformations4,27,28,29 (Fig. 1b). Although in some early work the use of π-effects in chiral catalysts could be seen30,31, the direct incorporation of specific π interactions into the design of catalysts as a key stereocontrol element still remains a challenge32,33. This is ascribed to the potential competition and synergetic cooperation between the relatively weak and unpredictable π interactions and other types of intermolecular forces operating simultaneously, which makes the precise control of such interactions hardly possible and highly context-dependent. Moreover, the detailed understanding of the reactivity- and selectivity-determining transition states at the molecular level for individual catalytic process is still lacking. These obstacles, even though having been overcome gradually through the synergistic efforts from experimental, theoretical, and computational chemists, still hamper the exquisite design of catalytic systems with precise control of reactivity and selectivity.
We envisioned if the weak, yet important non-covalent interactions were purposely utilized in the design of catalysts, it might open up a new avenue in enabling challenging chemical transformations that were previously considered difficult or even hardly possible to occur. We initiated out studies aimed at identifying appropriate catalytic systems in which non-covalent π interactions are presumably essential for stereocontrol. The cinchona alkaloid and its derivatives, as privileged catalysts and ligands used in asymmetric catalysis34,35, contain versatile π-character groups with varying steric and electronic properties. In cinchona alkaloid-catalyzed asymmetric reactions, the corresponding stereochemical outcomes are mainly governed by the absolute configuration of C936,37. An effective bi-functional catalysis mode may operate through the interaction between the cinchona alkaloid and a combination of electrophiles and nucleophiles connected by its quinuclidine N–C9–π scaffold (Fig. 1c). Taking the enantioselective functionalizations of alkenes as an example, the quinuclidine nitrogen coordinates to the electrophile, which subsequently reacts with the double bond of the substrate. An efficient asymmetric induction requires a π acceptor component (in blue) at C9 stereocenter in the cinchona alkaloid14. This would engage in an effectively operating π–π interaction between the π acceptor and alkene’s double bond that was a prototype of electron-rich π systems (in red). Such a “sandwich-like” mode would significantly facilitate enantio-face control of the alkene double bond (Fig. 1c, left). In comparison, to achieve efficient chiral recognition of an alkene substrate bearing an existing stereocenter at the allylic position, a π donor moiety (in red) at C9 in the cinchona alkaloid and a π acceptor moiety (in blue) adjacent to the stereocenter in the alkene substrate are needed14. This would enable a desirable non-covalent π interaction that incorporates the substrate’s stereocenter into the corresponding catalyst–substrate interaction framework, thus rendering a kinetic resolution process with potentially superior stereoselectivity (Fig. 1c, right).
We chose the Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation (SAD)-based kinetic resolution as a platform to investigate our proposed bi-functional catalysis strategy that utilizes non-covalent π interactions as key stereocontrol elements. The classic SAD reaction is widely applied to convert prochiral alkene substrates into chiral vicinal diols with excellent stereoselectivities. In stark contrast, the application of the powerful SAD reaction for the kinetic resolution of racemic olefin substrates such as allylic alcohol and its derivatives has been considered as an unsolved problem36. Despite of some sporadically reported cases38,39,40,41,42,43,44, SAD-based kinetic resolution has been proven to be generally ineffective. The reasons for such orthogonal stereochemical scenarios had not yet been well understood36. Thus, further investigation into such a catalytic system would not only help shed light on the intricate origin of enantioselectivity in this important catalytic reaction, but also stimulate understanding on the underlying principles of π interactions as well as developing catalysts with assembling properties based on these non-covalent forces. To the best of our knowledge, very few examples exist that use such weak yet essential non-covalent π interactions as the control elements in asymmetric catalytic reactions45,46.
In this work, we report the use of well-orchestrated non-covalent π interactions as crucial design elements in asymmetric catalysis. Relying on the favorable interaction between the lone-pair electrons on the C9 carbonyl of the cinchona alkaloid and the electron-deficient phthalazine π-system in the substrate, a highly efficient SAD-based kinetic resolution of racemic allylic substrates is realized (Fig. 1d). Density functional theory calculations indicate that the favored transition state is stabilized by this lone-pair–π interaction, which is absent in the disfavored transition state.
Results and discussions
Experimental studies on the development of effective non-covalent π interactions
Guided by the above analysis, our investigations started to focus on cinchona alkaloid ligands with a large, delocalized π-system, such as piperonylate in ligand A, to test the validity of our hypothesis (Fig. 2a). As the aromatic ring in piperonylate is flanked with both electron-donating and withdrawing substituents, its π-electron distributions are considerably polarizable thus conducive for potential π–π interactions13,14,47,48. Considering the potential undesired π–π interaction between the piperonylate moiety and the alkene’s double bond that would preclude the stereocenter outside of the catalyst–substrate interaction (Fig. 2b, left), an appropriate electron-poor π-character group that could compete in the π–π interaction with the piperonylate should be introduced in the racemic substrate (Fig. 2b, right). Thus under the catalysis of K2OsO2(OH)4 and cinchona alkaloid A, AD-based kinetic resolutions of racemic alkene substrates with a variety of electron-poor π systems were conducted (Fig. 2c). Racemic 1 bearing electron-deficient pyridine as the π acceptor was recovered in 33% ee at 56% conversion, and the corresponding selectivity factor was only obtained as 2. Then substrates including more electron-deficient aryl rings, such as pyrimidine and pyridazine, were explored. However, racemic 2 and 3 were only kinetically resolved with selectivity factors of 2 and 3, respectively. Subsequently, racemic 4 with larger aromatic π-system (i.e., 4-chorophthalazine) was examined, and its selectivity factor was slightly improved. Replacing the chloride with a methoxy group in the substrate 5 resulted in a less effective kinetic resolution. Considering that the extended arenes could probably engage in better π–π interactions1,49, we attached the phthalazine ring with a phenyl group. To our delight, the selectivity factor was increased to 5, presenting a promising prospect for further optimization. Para-substituted fluoride and methoxy group in the phenyl ring enable slightly more efficient kinetic resolution of racemic 7 and 8, respectively. Gratifyingly, increasing the number of the methoxy groups in the phenyl ring led to a dramatic increase in the efficiencies for the kinetic resolution. With 3,4,5-tri-methoxyl-substitution in the extended phenyl ring, racemic 10 underwent catalytic kinetic resolution with a selectivity factor of 32, yielding the recovered (R)-10 in 92% ee at 53% conversion. Finally, retaining the 3,4,5-tri-methoxyl-substituted phenyl ring in the conjugated π-system while changing the phthalazine to a pyridazine ring in racemic 11 resulted in a drastically decreased selectivity factor of 2, indicating the importance of the phthalazine in the non-covalent π interaction with the piperonylate of the catalyst.
We further investigated the nature of the non-covalent π interaction through varying the π-components at C9 of the cinchona alkaloids (Fig. 3). In addition to ligand A, it was found that benzoate moieties at C9 of B, C, and D (Fig. 3a) all lead to successful kinetic resolutions (s > 10). However, the benzoate moiety with extended conjugation in E, fails to lead to an efficient kinetic resolution (Fig. 3a). Unexpectedly, replacing the benzoate moiety with sole aryl rings, such as phenyl, naphthyl, benzyl or electron-deficient phthalazine groups, all leads to dramatic decreases in selectivity factors (ligands F, G, H, I and (DHQ)2PHAL, Fig. 3b), hinting on the critical role played by the carbonyl group in stereocontrol. Then we used aliphatic esters in the absence of aromatic rings, and high selectivity factors were surprisingly obtained (Fig. 3c). For instances, with simple ester groups, such as acetate in J and cyclopropanecarboxylate in K, (R)-10 was kinetically resolved in 86% and 94% ee’s at around 50% conversions, respectively. These unexpected results imply that a lone-pair–π interaction between the carbonyl oxygen of the ligand and the π-auxiliary of the substrate50,51 might be involved in the stereoselectivity-determining transition state, which has not yet been reported as a controlling factor in asymmetric catalysis. Then increasing the steric hindrance of the ester group, for instances, using the adamantyl substituent in L, still results in a successful kinetic resolution. In contrast, when the trifloroacetate M was examined, the corresponding selectivity factor drastically decreased to 2. This remarkable electronic effect supports the lone-pair–π interaction as a key element in the AD-based kinetic resolution, since the electron-deficient trifloromethyl group might withdraw the lone-pair electrons of the carbonyl thus disrupt its interaction with π system in the ligand. A further evidence of the central role played by the lone-pair–π interaction was appreciable from the result obtained with ligand N, where the more electron-rich Weinreb amide moiety allows racemic 10 to be resolved with the selectivity factor of 34.
Investigation on the origins of stereoselectivity
To understand the origins of chiral recognition for this kinetic resolution, we chose to use both the structurally simplest substrate (racemic 12) and ligand (J) to perform the AD-based kinetic resolution (Fig. 4a). At 59% conversion, the recovered 12 was obtained in 90% ee with a selectivity factor of 13. The diol product 12a was obtained with a diastereomeric ratio of 7:1 and the enantio-purity of the major diastereomer was found to be only modest (67% ee), as expected based on the proposed bi-functional catalysis modes in Fig. 1c. The absolute stereochemistry of the major enantiomer of the recovered 12 was confirmed to have (R)-configuration at its allylic carbon (for details, please see the Supplementary Information), indicating that the more reactive enantiomer of 12 has the (S)-configuration. The corresponding stereoselectivity-determining transition states (TSs) for this reaction were explored using density functional theory (DFT) calculations (See Supplementary Information for more details about computational methods, and supplementary data 1 for XYZ coordinates). Owing to the flexibility of the substrate and the ligand, thorough conformational searches for the TSs were performed (for details, please see Supplementary Information). The corresponding lowest energy TSs for the (S)- and (R)-substrates are shown in Fig. 4b. TS-(S) is lower in energy than TS-(R) (ΔΔG = − 1.6 kcal/mol, ΔΔE = − 3.1 kcal/mol), which supports the experimental result that (R)-12 was kinetically resolved with good selectivity. In the [3 + 2] cycloaddition TSs, two C-O bonds are being formed in a concerted fashion52. There are no obvious steric clashes in the TSs. Distal to the forming bonds, two important sets of non-covalent interactions were identified. In both TSs, parallel displaced π–π interactions between the quinoline moiety of the ligand and the tri-methoxyphenyl group of the substrate are present (3.4 Å and 3.3 Å, respectively). In the favored transition state TS-(S), a lone-pair π interaction between the carbonyl group of the ligand and the phthalazine moiety of the substrate is evidenced clearly by the short distances of the carbonyl oxygen to the centroid of and to the plane of the diazine ring (2.94 Å and 2.87 Å, respectively)25,53. However, this type of interaction is absent in the disfavored transition state TS-(R), which may contribute to the difference in energy of these two TSs. Further calculations using truncated model show that the lone-pair π interaction is −3.1 kcal/mol, which is the main contributor to the stereoselectivity (Fig. 4c). The π–π interaction is relatively strong in its magnitude (−8.1 kcal/mol), which may contribute to the binding of substrate with the catalyst but plays a much smaller role in controlling the stereoselectivity, as both TSs have such an interaction in a similar magnitude. To unravel the nature of the lone-pair–π interactions, we performed energy decomposition analysis (EDA) (Fig. 4c, center box) to separate ΔEint (−3.1 kcal/mol) into chemically meaningful energy terms, including Pauli repulsions (ΔEpauli = 3.6 kcal/mol), electrostatic interactions (ΔEeletat = −2.8 kcal/mol), orbital interactions (ΔEorb = −1.4 kcal/mol) and London dispersion forces (ΔEdisp = −2.5 kcal/mol)54. These results indicate that electrostatic interactions and London dispersion forces are the two largest components, contributing 42% and 37% to the total stabilizing interactions, respectively.
Reaction scope
Having identified the crucial role of the lone-pair–π interaction between the cinchona alkaloid ligand and the alkene substrate in stereocontrol, we finally demonstrated the generality of the reaction scope (Fig. 5). A number of alkene substitution patterns in the racemic allylic ethers were found to be well accommodated, including 1-substituted, 1,1-disubstituted and (E)-1,2-disubstituted alkenes, and their corresponding diol products were also obtained. For mono-substituted alkenes, R1 group varying among methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, decyl, benzyl, 3-pentyl, cyclobutyl, cyclopentyl and cyclohexyl substituents were all compatible with this strategy. The resolved chiral allylic eithers were obtained with 84% to 97% ee’s at practical conversions (Fig. 5a). It is worth mentioning that these simple allylic ethers or their corresponding alcohols have been hardly accessed with high ee’s either by direct asymmetric reduction of prochiral ketones or by asymmetric 1,2 addition to aldehydes. Racemic allylic ethers bearing 1,1-disubstituted alkenes (Fig. 5b) and (E)-1,2-disubstituted alkenes (Fig. 5c) were also successfully resolved under identical conditions. The moderate stereoselectivities of the corresponding diols are not unexpected: the π-partner in the cinchona alkaloid ligand can only have this non-covalent π interaction with the introduced 3,4,5-tri-methoxyl-substituted phthalazine moiety instead of alkene’s double bond in the substrate, so that the “sandwich-like” mode that facilitates enantio-face control of the alkenes could not be formed (Fig. 1c, left). Unsuccessful substrates include (Z)-disubstituted alkenes and trisubstituted alkenes (Fig. 5d). Allylic ether 29 gave no conversion even with increased reaction time or catalyst loading, as cis-double bonds are challenging substrates in OsO4-catalyzed dihydroxylations55. Tri-substituted alkene 30 provided practical conversion but with low ee. As shown in Fig. 6, we are pleased to find that the π-moiety in (R)-16 can be easily removed to reveal its alcohol version (R)-31, which can be further converted to chiral allylic amine (S)-32 via Mitsunobu reaction without loss of the stereochemical fidelity.
In conclusion, we have developed a highly efficient catalytic system based on modified cinchona alkaloids. A bi-functional catalysis strategy was proposed and subsequently tested in the Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation-based kinetic resolution of racemic olefins. Rationally designed and well-engineered non-covalent π interactions are incorporated as key elements for stereocontrol to tackle this persistent challenge in asymmetric catalysis. A relatively weak lone-pair–π interaction between the ligand and the substrate was discovered to play a crucial role in differentiating the enantiomeric substrates bearing 1-substituted, 1,1-substituted and (E)-alkenes during chiral recognition. Fully integrated experimental and computational studies provide strong support of such non-covalent π interactions in the stereodetermining transition states. The search of a rigid system bearing a π-auxiliary to facilitate AD-based kinetic resolution of the less reactive Z-alkenes is underway. Further investigations and applications exploiting the lone-pair–π interaction that was originally discovered in biological systems are expected to reveal whether nature also utilizes this type of non-covalent force in the biosynthesis of natural products and guide the development of new chiral catalysts in the laboratory. We anticipate that this discovery will stimulate wider utilization and manipulation of non-covalent π interactions at the outset of rational catalyst design to solve other challenging problems in asymmetric catalysis.
Methods
Representative procedure for Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation-based kinetic resolution of racemic allylic ether 13
To a 20 mL glass tube containing a magnetic stir bar was charged with K3Fe(CN)6 (98.7 mg, 3.0 equiv.), K2CO3 (41.2 mg, 3.0 equiv.) and racemic allylic ether 13 (0.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv.). To a 50 mL round bottom flask, stock solution of K2OsO2(OH)4 (2.9 mg) and ligand K (7.9 mg) was prepared with 20 mL of tBuOH-H2O (v/v = 1:1). 1.0 mL of the above stock solution was also added to the glass tube. Then the reaction mixture was cooled to 0 °C and stirred at this temperature for 13 h, which was quenched with saturated aqueous Na2S2O3 (2.0 mL) at room temperature and extracted with ethyl acetate (2.0 mL × 3). The combined organic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The selectivity factor (s) was calculated through the equation: s = In[(1 − c)(1 − ee)]/In[(1 − c)(1+ee)]. The conversion (c) of the reaction (c = 59%) and diastereomeric ratio (dr = 7:1) of the diol product 13a were determined by 1H NMR analysis. Enantiomeric excesses (ees) of both (R)-13 (98% ee) and 13a (79% ee) were determined by chiral high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. The residue was purified by column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 3:1 to 1:2) on silica gel to give the allylic ether (R)-13 (15.2 mg, 40% yield) and diol product 13a (23.6 mg, 57% yield).
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information files. Raw data are available from the corresponding author on request. Materials and methods, experimental procedures, characterization data, 1H, 13C, NMR spectra and mass spectrometry data are available in the Supplementary Materials.
References
Knowles, R. R. & Jacobsen, E. N. Attractive noncovalent interactions in asymmetric catalysis: links between enzymes and small molecule catalysts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 20678–20658 (2010).
Metrano, A. J. et al. Asymmetric catalysis mediated by synthetic peptides, version 2.0: expansion of scope and mechanism. Chem. Rev. 120, 11479–11615 (2020).
Phipps, R. J., Hamilton, G. L. & Toste, F. D. The progression of chiral anions from concepts to applications in asymmetric catalysis. Nat. Chem. 4, 603–614 (2012).
Wheeler, S. E., Seguin, T. J., Guan, Y. & Doney, A. C. Noncovalent interactions in organocatalysis and the prospect of computational catalyst design. Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 1061–1069 (2016).
Fanourakis, A., Docherty, P. J., Chuentragool, P. & Phipps, R. J. Recent developments in enantioselective transition metal catalysis featuring attractive noncovalent interactions between ligand and substrate. ACS Catal. 10, 10672–10714 (2020).
Loh, C. C. J. Exploiting non-covalent interactions in selective carbohydrate synthesis. Nat. Rev. Chem. 5, 792–815 (2021).
Zuend, S. J., Coughlin, M. P., Lalonde, M. P. & Jacobsen, E. N. Scaleable catalytic asymmetric Strecker syntheses of unnatural alpha-amino acids. Nature 461, 968–970 (2009).
Rauniyar, V., Lackner, A. D., Hamilton, G. L. & Toste, G. L. Asymmetric electrophilic fluorination using an anionic chiral phase-trasnfer catalyst. Science 334, 1681–1684 (2011).
Zhang, J. et al. Asymmetric phosphoric acid-catalyzed four-component Ugi reaction. Science 361, eaas8707 (2018).
Cockroft, S. L. & Hunter, C. A. Chemical double-mutant cycles: dissecting non-covalent interactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 36, 172–188 (2007).
Schneider, H.-J. Binding mechanisms in supramolecular complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 3924–3977 (2009).
Salonen, L. M., Ellermann, M. & Diederich, F. Aromatic rings in chemical and biological recognition: energetics and structures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 4808–4842 (2011).
Hunter, C. A. & Sanders, J. K. M. The nature of π-π interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112, 5525–5534 (1990).
Martinez, C. R. & Iverson, B. L. Rethinking the term “pi-stacking”. Chem. Sci. 3, 2191–2201 (2012).
Wheeler, D. E., McNeil, A. J., Müller, P., Swager, T. M. & Houk, K. N. Probing substituent effects in aryl-aryl interactions using stereoselective Diels-Alder cycloadditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 3304–3311 (2010).
Nishio, M., Umezawa, Y., Fantini, J., Weiss, M. S. & Chakrabati, P. CH-π hydrogen bonds in biological macromolecules. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 12648–12683 (2014).
Bloom, J. W. G., Raju, R. K. & Wheeler, S. E. Physical nature of substituent effects in XH/π interactions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 3167–3174 (2012).
Mecozzi, S., West, A. P. & Dougherty, D. A. Jr. Cation-π interactions in simple aromatics: electrostatics provide a predictive tool. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 2307–2308 (1996).
Dougherty, D. A. The cation-π interaction. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 885–893 (2013).
Kennedy, C. R., Lin, S. & Jacobsen, E. N. The cation-π interaction in small-molecule catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 12596–12624 (2016).
Yamada, S. Cation-π interactions in organic synthesis. Chem. Rev. 118, 11353–11432 (2018).
Frontera, A., Gamez, P., Mascal, M., Mooibroek, T. J. & Reedijk, J. Putting anion-π interactions into perspective. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 9564–9583 (2011).
Molina, P., Zapata, F. & Caballero, A. Anion recognition strategies based on combined noncovalent interactions. Chem. Rev. 117, 9907–9972 (2017).
Egli, M. & Gessner, R. V. Stereoelectronic effects of deoxyribose O4’ on DNA conformation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 180–184 (1995).
Egli, M. & Sarkhel, S. Lone pair-aromatic interactions: to stabilize or not to stabilize. Acc. Chem. Res. 40, 197–205 (2007).
Mooibroek, T. J., Gamez, P. & Reedijk, J. Lone pair–π interactions: a new supramolecular bond? CrystEngComm 10, 1501–1515 (2008).
Krenske, E. H. & Houk, K. N. Aromatic interactions as control elements in stereoselective organic reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 979–989 (2013).
Yamakawa, M., Yamada, I. & Noyori, R. CH/π attraction: the origin of enantioselectivity in transfer hydrogenation of aromatic carbonyl compounds catalyzed by chiral η6-arene-ruthenium(II) complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 40, 2818–2821 (2001).
Li, X., Liu, P., Houk, K. N. & Birman, V. B. Origin of enantioselectivity in CF3–PIP-catalyzed kinetic resolution of secondary benzylic alcohols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 13836–13837 (2008).
Kawabata, T., Nagato, M., Takasu, K. & Fuji, K. Nonenzymatic kinetic resolution of racemic alcohols through an “induced fit” process. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 3169–3170 (1997).
Miller, S. J., Copeland, G. T., Papaioannou, N., Horstmann, T. E. & Ruel, E. M. Kinetic resolution of alcohols catalyzed by tripeptides containing the N-alkylimidazole substructure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 1629–1630 (1998).
Neel, A. J., Hilton, M. J., Sigman, M. S. & Toste, F. D. Exploring non-covalent π interactions for catalyst design. Nature 543, 637–646 (2017).
Raynal, M., Ballester, P., Vidal-Ferran, A. & van Leeuwen, P. W. N. M. Supramolecular catalysis. Part 1: non-covalent interactions as a tool for building and modifying homogenous catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 1660–1733 (2014).
Tian, S.-K. et al. Asymmetric organic catalysis with modified cinchona alkaloids. Acc. Chem. Res. 37, 621–631 (2004).
Tanriver, G., Dedeoglu, B., Catak, S. & Aviyente, V. Computational studies on cinchona alkaloid-catalyzed asymmetric organic reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 1250–1262 (2016).
Kolb, H. C., VanNieuwenhze, M. S. & Sharpless, K. B. Catalytic asymmetric dihydroxylation. Chem. Rev. 94, 2483–2547 (1994).
Li, H., Wang, Y., Tang, L. & Deng, L. Highly enantioselective conjugate addition of malonate and β-ketoester to nitroalkenes: asymmetric C–C bond formation with new bifunctioanl organic catalysts based on cinchona alkaloids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 9906–9907 (2004).
Corey, E. J., Noe, M. C. & Guzman-Perez, A. Kinetic resolution by enantioselective dihydroxylation of secondary allylic 4-methoxybenzoate esters using a mechanistically designed cinchona alkaloid catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 10817–10824 (1995).
Gardiner, J. M., Nørret, M. & Sadler, I. H. Diastereospecific dihydroxylation and highly efficient asymmetric dihydroxylation kinetic resolution of cis/trans-2,6-dimethyl-benzylidenecyclohexane. Chem. Commun. 1996, 2709–2710 (1996).
Yokomatsu, T., Yamagishi, T., Sada, T., Suemune, K. & Shibuya, S. Asymmetric dihydroxylation of 1-acyloxy-2(E)-alkenylphosphonates with AD-mix reagents. Effects of 1-acyloxy functional groups on the asymmetric dihydroxylation. Tetrahedron 54, 781–790 (1998).
Christie, H. S., Hamon, D. P. G. & Tuck, K. L. Concerning kinetic resolution by the Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation reaction. Chem. Commun. 1999, 1989–1990 (1999).
Rios, R., Jimeno, C., Carroll, P. J. & Walsh, P. J. Kinetic resolution of atropisomeric amides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 10272–10273 (2002).
Agustí, B., Rosol, M., García, J. & Moyano, A. Asymmetric dihydroxylation of 2-substituted 1-vinylferrocenes: the first non-enzymatic kinetic resolution of planar-chiral ferrocenes. Adv. Synth. Catal. 348, 2590–2596 (2006).
Xing, X., Zhao, Y., Xu, C., Zhao, X. & Wang, D. Z. Electronic helix theory-guided rational design of kinetic resolutions by means of the Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation reactions. Tetrahedron 68, 7288–7294 (2012).
Neel, A. J., Milo, A., Sigman, M. S. & Toste, F. D. Enantiodivergent fluorination of allylic alcohols: data set design reveals structural interplay between achiral directing group and chiral anion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 3863–3875 (2016).
Dub, P. A. et al. Enantioselectivity in the Noyori-Ikariya asymmetric transfer hydrogenation of ketones. Organometallics 40, 1402–1410 (2021).
Fujisawa, K. et al. Ion Pair-π interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 11047–11056 (2015).
Sinnokrot, M. O. & Sherrill, C. D. Substituent effects in π-π interactions: sandwich and T-shaped configurations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 7690–7697 (2004).
Vijay, D. & Sastry, G. N. Exploring the size dependence of cyclic and acyclic π-systems on cataion–π binding. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, 582–590 (2008).
Jain, A., Purohit, C. S., Verma, S. & Sankararamakrishnan, R. Close contacts between carbonyl oxygen atoms and aromatic centers in protein structures: π…π or lone pair…π interactions? J. Phys. Chem. B. 111, 8680–8683 (2007).
Li, P. et al. Electrostatically driven CO–π aromatic interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 12513–12517 (2019).
DelMonte, A. J. et al. A. Experimental and theoretical kinetic isotope effects for asymmetric dihydroxylation. Evidence supporting a rate-limiting “(3+2)” cycloaddition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 9907–9908 (1997).
Hao, H., Qi, X., Tang, W. & Liu, P. Energy decomposition analysis reveals the nature of lone pair-π interactions with cationic π systems in catalytic acyl transfer reactions. Org. Lett. 23, 4411–4414 (2021).
Morokuma, K. Molecular Orbital studies of hydrogen bonds. III. C=O…H-O hydrogen bond in H2CO…H2O and H2CO…2H2O. J. Chem. Phys. 55, 1236 (1971).
Wang, L. & Sharpless, K. B. Catalytic asymmetric dihydroxylation of cis-disubstituted olefins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 7570–7571 (1992).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for financial support from the Shenzhen Nobel Prize Scientists Laboratory Project (C17783101 to C.X.), Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Catalysis (2020B121201002 to C.X.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (K21211026 to C.X.), Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (KQTD20180411143514543 and K20215006 to C.X.) and Shenzhen YOUWEI Tech Group. Computational work was supported by Center for Computational Science and Engineering at Southern University of Science and Technology, and the CHEM high-performance supercomputer cluster (CHEMHPC) located at the Department of Chemistry, Southern University of Science and Technology. Prof. Bin Tan is acknowledged for helpful discussions and valuable suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.Y.J., Q.Z., and G.T. developed and conducted the reactions. D.X. and P.Y. conducted the computational studies. X.X., P.Y., and C.X. designed and directed the investigation and prepared the manuscript. All correspondence should be sent to C.X. (xuc@susteche.edu.cn) and P.Y. (yupy@sustech.edu.cn).
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Valentin Hornillos, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Jin, M.Y., Zhen, Q., Xiao, D. et al. Engineered non-covalent π interactions as key elements for chiral recognition. Nat Commun 13, 3276 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31026-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31026-8
This article is cited by
-
Flexible and sewable electrode based on Ni-Co@PANI-salphen composite-coated on textiles for wearable supercapacitor
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Ligand-induced activation and G protein coupling of prostaglandin F2α receptor
Nature Communications (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.