Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Large orbital masses due to longstanding hydrogel retinal explants

Abstract

Aim

To describe the features of orbital masses occurring as a late complication of hydrogel retinal explants.

Patients and methods

Retrospective review of patients presenting with orbital masses at decades after retinal surgery.

Results

Two patients with huge orbital masses are described, their presenting 25 and 28 years after retinal detachment repair with expansile hydrogel explants. In one case, the preoperative diagnosis was pleomorphic adenoma, and the other—with extreme distortion of the globe—was considered to be lymphoma or chronic inflammation arising around prior retinal explants. At orbitotomy, the masses were found to be grossly expanded hydrogel explants that were removed piecemeal from their fibrous capsules. Histopathology showed very mild inflammation with occasional multinucleate giant cells and patchy capsular calcification, and an eosinophilic amorphous material staining strongly with Alcian-blue. Surgery was uncomplicated and both orbits healed with marked functional improvement.

Conclusion

Expansile hydrogel retinal explants were largely used in the 1980s and can present, often decades after the retinal surgery, with impaired orbital functions due to large parabulbar masses. The hydrophilic material appears to expand very slowly over decades, leading to gross distortion of neighbouring structures and a tumour-like mass.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Imaging and histology for patients with hydrogel orbital masses.
Fig. 2: Surgical appearance for 2 patients during excision of hydrogel orbital masses.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ho PC, Chan IM, Refojo MF, Tolentino FI. The MAI hydrophilic implant for scleral buckling: a review. Ophthalmic Surg. 1984;15:511–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Crama N, Klevering BJ. The removal of hydrogel explants: an analysis of 467 consecutive cases. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:32–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tolentino FI, Roldan M, Nassif J, Refojo MF. Hydrogel implant for scleral buckling. Long-term observations. Retina. 1985;5:38–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thompson JT, Chambers WA. Good ideas gone bad: the MIRAgel saga. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:5–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roh M, Lee NG, Miller JB. Complications associated with MIRAgel for treatment of retinal detachment. Semin Ophthalmol. 2018;33:89–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shields CL, Demirci H, Marr BP, Mashayekhi A, Materin MA, Shields JA. Expanding MIRAgel scleral buckle simulating an orbital tumor in four cases. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;21:32–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chean CS, Lim CS, Mudhar HS, Lokovitis E, Sampath R. Chronic macular oedema as a late MIRAgel-related complication. Vision (Basel). 2021;5:55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tankyo Y, Harada Y, Hiyama T, Ohara H, Mizukami M, Okumichi H, et al. Irreversible intraocular pressure elevation as a complication of MIRAgel scleral buckling. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2022;27:101583.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rubinstein TJ, Choudhary MM, Modi YS, Ehlers JP, Perry JD. Globe loss from intraocular invasion of MIRAgel scleral buckle components. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;32:329–32.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Czyz CN, Petrie TP, Everman KR, Cahill KV, Foster JA. Hydrogel explant extrusion masquerading as a malignant eyelid lesion. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;29:e25–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Figuera EC, Francis IC, Wilcsek GA. Scleral MIRAgel causing bony orbital erosion. Orbit. 2007;26:65–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tong GY, Smith M, Gout T, Tumuluri K, Taylor S. Orbital and sinonasal complications of hydrogel scleral buckle: a case report. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;38:e162–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the photomicrography provided by Professor Philip Luthert from the Department of Histopathology, Institute of Ophthalmology, London.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GER initiated the work; all authors contributed to patient care, data acquisition and manuscript preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoffrey E. Rose.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mas-Castells, M., Verity, D.H. & Rose, G.E. Large orbital masses due to longstanding hydrogel retinal explants. Eye 38, 806–808 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02783-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02783-7

Search

Quick links